Project
Synopsis and
Comprehensive
Analysis:
Windpark
Prignitz-Heide
(150 MW)
Project Synopsis and Comprehensive Analysis:
Windpark Prignitz-Heide (150 MW)
1
Executive Summary
The "Windpark Prignitz-Heide" is a proposed 150 MW onshore
wind energy project located in the Prignitz district of
Brandenburg, Germany. Developed as a joint venture between
the established renewable energy firm EnergieWende AG and
the newly formed citizen cooperative Bürgerenergie Prignitz eG,
the project aims to set a new benchmark for Germany's energy
transition (Energiewende). By integrating advanced turbine
technology—specifically 25 Vestas V162-6.0 MW turbines—with
a robust framework for community co-ownership and stringent
environmental mitigation, the project seeks to achieve a
harmonious balance between economic viability, ecological
responsibility, and social acceptance.
Upon completion, the wind park is projected to generate
approximately 493 GWh of clean electricity annually, enough to
power over 150,000 German households and displace nearly
350,000 tonnes of CO₂ per year. The project's hybrid revenue
model, combining a fixed tariff from Germany's EEG auction with
future opportunities in the merchant power market, is designed
for long-term financial resilience. Facing key challenges,
including navigating an accelerated yet complex permitting
process and mitigating potential impacts on protected species
like the Red Kite, the project's strategy is rooted in proactive
stakeholder engagement and data-driven environmental
solutions. "Windpark Prignitz-Heide" is positioned not merely as
an energy generation asset but as a comprehensive model for
sustainable regional development, demonstrating how large2
scale renewable infrastructure can deliver shared value to
investors, local communities, and the national grid.
3
Part I: Project Synopsis – Windpark Prignitz-Heide (150
MW)
Project Vision
This document provides a synopsis and comprehensive analysis of the
proposed Windpark Prignitz-Heide, a large-scale, 150-megawatt (MW)
onshore wind energy project located in the Prignitz district of
Brandenburg, Germany. The project is conceived as a benchmark for the
next phase of Germany's energy transition, the Energiewende. Its core
vision is to demonstrate that ambitious renewable energy expansion can
be achieved in a manner that is not only economically viable and
technologically advanced but also deeply integrated with local
communities and committed to the highest standards of environmental
stewardship.
Windpark Prignitz-Heide is designed to be a direct and substantial
contribution to both federal and state-level climate and energy targets.1
It aims to navigate the complex contemporary landscape of German
renewables—a landscape characterized by accelerated deployment
targets, significant supply chain pressures, and an evolving regulatory
framework. The project's structure, technology selection, and
engagement strategy have been meticulously crafted to address these
challenges, creating a model for future developments that seek to
balance national imperatives with local realities. By successfully
integrating cutting-edge technology with a genuine community
4
partnership model, Prignitz-Heide aspires to set a new standard for
social license to operate, ensuring long-term value creation for all
stakeholders.
Project Entity: Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH
The project will be developed, constructed, and operated by
Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH, a special purpose vehicle (SPV)
established specifically for this undertaking. The SPV is structured as a
joint venture (JV) to combine professional expertise with local investment
and acceptance, a model proven to be effective in the German context.3
The partnership comprises two key entities:
1.
2.
A Majority Partner (75% Equity): A highly experienced, fictitious
German renewable energy developer, "Energie-Entwicklung Nord
(EEN) AG," modeled on successful national players like ENERTRAG or
UKA. EEN brings a proven track record in large-scale project
management, navigating complex permitting processes, securing
financing, and managing construction and long-term operations. This
ensures the project benefits from professional execution, economies
of scale, and established relationships with suppliers and grid
operators.
A Minority Partner (25% Equity): A newly formed local citizen
energy cooperative, "Bürgerwind Prignitz eG." This cooperative
(Bürgerenergiegenossenschaft) will be open to all residents of the
Prignitz district, local municipalities, and regional businesses. Its
purpose is to channel local investment into the project, ensure a
direct financial return to the community, and provide a formal
structure for local participation and oversight. This structure is a
modern adaptation of Germany's traditional Bürgerwindpark model,
5
designed to overcome the financial and technical hurdles that
standalone cooperatives now face in the competitive auction-based
market.4
This hybrid JV structure is a strategic response to the current market
environment. It secures the professional execution necessary for a
project of this scale while embedding the principles of community
ownership and benefit-sharing that are critical for long-term social
acceptance and success.3
Site Selection and Resource Assessment
The project site is strategically located in the Prignitz district of
Brandenburg. This selection is underpinned by a multi-factor analysis
that balances wind resource quality with land use compatibility and
regulatory alignment.
●
●
Location Rationale: Brandenburg is a key state for Germany's
onshore wind expansion. It has some of the highest onshore wind
power densities in the country and has demonstrated a proactive
approach to fulfilling its land allocation targets under the federal
Wind-an-Land-Gesetz (Wind on Land Act).7 The state's political and
administrative framework is comparatively favorable for wind energy
development, with permitting times that are among the fastest in
Germany.10 The Prignitz district, in particular, offers large tracts of
suitable land with relatively low population density, reducing potential
conflicts with residential areas.11
Site Characteristics: The chosen site spans approximately 1,500
hectares of predominantly low-grade agricultural land and areas of
managed pine monoculture forest. This specific land use profile was
deliberately chosen to minimize ecological and agricultural impact.
6
●
The use of "economically managed forests" with low biodiversity
value is a key part of the strategy to avoid conflicts with ecologically
sensitive, old-growth, or mixed forests, a primary concern for
environmental stakeholders like the Nature and Biodiversity
Conservation Union (NABU).2
Wind Resource Assessment: A thorough wind resource assessment,
based on data from the Global Wind Atlas and supplemented by onsite LiDAR measurements, confirms the site's viability.13 The analysis
indicates a mean annual wind speed of approximately
7.0 to 7.5 meters per second (m/s) at the proposed hub height of
166 meters. This places the site in the low-to-medium wind speed
category, making it an ideal match for the latest generation of largerotor wind turbines specifically designed for such conditions.15 The
wind regime is consistent, with expected peaks during the winter
months, complementing the national solar generation profile.17
Technical Specifications and Technology Choice
The project's technical design emphasizes efficiency, reliability, and the
mitigation of environmental impacts through the selection of advanced,
proven technology.
●
Turbine Model: The project will deploy 25 Vestas V162-6.0 MW
EnVentus wind turbines, resulting in a total installed capacity of 150
MW. This turbine is part of Vestas's well-established EnVentus
platform, which has surpassed 19 GW in firm order intake globally.18
The V162-6.0 MW model is specifically engineered for low-to-medium
wind conditions, featuring a large 162-meter rotor diameter to
maximize energy capture.19 While newer, more powerful models like
the 7.2 MW variant exist, the 6.0 MW turbine was selected as a
7
●
●
deliberate risk-mitigation strategy, offering a more extensive
operational track record and a more robust supply chain, which is
critical in the current market.17
Tower and Dimensions: The turbines will be installed on 166-meter
hub heights using High Tubular Steel Towers (HTST). This significant
height is crucial for accessing the more powerful and less turbulent
wind streams present at higher altitudes, a key strategy for enhancing
energy yield and economic viability in inland locations like
Brandenburg.8 The resulting total tip height of the turbines will be
247 meters, a critical parameter that informs the scope of aviation
safety assessments and species protection studies.
Grid Integration and Ancillary Systems: The wind farm will be
equipped with advanced control systems to ensure full compliance
with Germany's stringent grid codes (VDE-AR-N 4120). This includes
capabilities for dynamic voltage support and frequency regulation. To
mitigate local impacts, the project will incorporate the Vestas Shadow
Flicker Control System and a state-of-the-art, AI-driven Anti-Collision
System (ACS) for avian protection.22
Windpark
Metrics
Prignitz-Heide:
Key
Project Name
Windpark Prignitz-Heide
Location
Prignitz
Germany
Developer (SPV)
Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH
Community Partner
Bürgerwind Prignitz eG
Total Capacity
150 MW
Turbine Model
Vestas V162-6.0 MW EnVentus
Number of Turbines
25
8
District,
Brandenburg,
Hub Height
166 m
Rotor Diameter
162 m
Projected Annual Energy Production
(AEP)
~490 GWh
Projected Capacity Factor
~37%
Estimated Total CAPEX
€195 Million
Target Levelized Cost of Electricity
(LCOE)
€0.055 – €0.065 per kWh
Development Timeline and Key Milestones
The project is planned over a total duration of five years, from initial site
identification to the commencement of commercial operations. This
timeline is considered ambitious but achievable, reflecting the
accelerated procedures introduced by recent German legislation while
accounting for practical realities.10
●
●
Year 1: Feasibility and Early Engagement
○ Q1-Q2: Site screening, preliminary wind resource analysis, and
securing of land lease options.
○ Q3-Q4: Initiation of preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) studies and commencement of early, informal stakeholder
consultations with local municipalities, landowners, and
environmental groups like NABU.
Year 2: Permitting Application
○ Q1-Q2: Completion of detailed EIA, noise, and shadow flicker
studies. Finalization of the comprehensive permit application
9
●
●
●
package.
○ Q3: Submission of the formal permit application to the competent
authority under the Federal Immission Control Act (BundesImmissionsschutzgesetz, BImSchG).
○ Q4: Scoping conference with authorities to define the formal
review process.
Year 3: Approval and Auction
○ Q1-Q3: Formal BImSchG procedure, including public display of
documents and public hearing. The goal is to receive the permit by
the end of Q3, leveraging Brandenburg's faster-than-average
processing times.
○ Q4: Participation in the federal onshore wind auction conducted
by the Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur) to secure a
20-year revenue support mechanism.
Year 4: Financing and Pre-Construction
○ Q1: Final Investment Decision (FID) following a successful auction
award.
○ Q2: Financial close, securing debt financing based on the auction
result and equity commitments from the JV partners.
○ Q3-Q4: Finalization of turbine supply and service agreements with
Vestas. Procurement of balance-of-plant contractors. Detailed
engineering and site preparation.
Year 5: Construction and Commissioning
○ Q1-Q3: Civil works (foundations, access roads), electrical works
(cabling, substation), and turbine erection.
○ Q4: Grid connection and commissioning of the wind farm.
Commencement of commercial operation.
Projected Impact and Outcomes
10
Upon completion, Windpark Prignitz-Heide is projected to deliver
significant environmental, economic, and social benefits, aligning directly
with the goals of the Energiewende.
●
●
●
●
Clean Energy Generation: With a projected Annual Energy
Production (AEP) of approximately 490 Gigawatt-hours (GWh), the
wind farm will provide sufficient clean electricity to power over
150,000 average German households.17 This is based on a
projected
net
capacity
factor
of
approximately
37%, a figure significantly higher than the German national average
for onshore wind, reflecting the superior performance of the chosen
high-hub, large-rotor technology.26
Climate Change Mitigation: The project will make a substantial
contribution to Germany's decarbonization efforts. By displacing
electricity generated from the current German grid mix, the wind farm
is estimated to abate over 220,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2)
emissions annually.20
Economic and Community Benefits: The project represents a total
investment of approximately €195 million. It will create local jobs
during the construction phase and long-term positions in operations
and maintenance. Through the Bürgerwind Prignitz eG, a significant
portion of the project's profits will be distributed directly to local
citizen-investors. Furthermore, the project will generate substantial
local tax revenues (Gewerbesteuer) for the host municipalities,
providing a new and stable income stream for public services.3
Advancing the Energy Transition: By successfully implementing a
large-scale project in a complex market, Windpark Prignitz-Heide will
serve as a powerful case study. It will demonstrate the viability of the
hybrid developer-community partnership model, showcase best
practices in environmental mitigation, and provide a tangible example
of how Germany can achieve its ambitious 2030 and 2035 wind
energy targets.17
11
12
Part II: Comprehensive Project Analysis and Evaluation
Section 1: Strategic Context and Market Positioning
The viability and strategic relevance of the Windpark Prignitz-Heide
project can only be understood within the dynamic and demanding
context of Germany's current energy policy and market environment. The
project is not being developed in a vacuum; it is a direct product of, and a
response to, a series of powerful legislative and economic forces shaping
the Energiewende.
1.1 Alignment with National and State Policy
The Prignitz-Heide project is fundamentally aligned with the strategic
direction of German energy policy at both the federal and state levels.
The German government has established some of the most ambitious
renewable energy targets in the world, creating a powerful top-down
driver for projects of this scale. The Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG
2023) and the government's overarching climate strategy mandate a
dramatic acceleration in wind power deployment. The national targets
call for an increase in onshore wind capacity to 115 GW by 2030 and 160
GW by 2035, up from a base of around 63 GW in 2024.17 A 150 MW
project like Prignitz-Heide represents a tangible and necessary step
13
towards meeting these goals, which require an average annual expansion
of nearly 13 GW—a rate more than four times that achieved in 2024.17
This federal ambition is translated into concrete obligations for the states
through the Wind-an-Land-Gesetz (WindBG). This landmark legislation
legally requires Germany's federal states to collectively designate 2% of
their land area for wind energy development by 2032, with an interim
target of 1.4% by 2027.9 The project's location in Brandenburg is
strategically astute, as the state is not only endowed with favorable wind
conditions but is also one of the more proactive states in identifying and
designating these areas to meet its 2.2% target.7 By siting the project in a
supportive state, the developer mitigates significant political and
planning risks.
Furthermore, the entire legal framework has been buttressed by the
principle of "overriding public interest" for renewable energy, a concept
enshrined in both German law and the EU's Renewable Energy Directive
(RED III).1 This legal status is designed to give renewable energy projects
greater weight in planning decisions and to streamline legal challenges,
providing a crucial tailwind for the project's permitting process.
1.2 Competitive Landscape and Market Dynamics
While policy provides a strong tailwind, the project must navigate a
turbulent market. The German onshore wind sector has rebounded
impressively from a severe slump between 2019 and 2021, which was
caused by a difficult transition to an auction-based system and
permitting bottlenecks.17 In 2024, a record 14 GW of new capacity was
licensed, signaling a resurgence in developer confidence and a robust
project pipeline.17 Prignitz-Heide enters a market with strong momentum.
14
However, this momentum is coupled with significant headwinds. The
global energy crisis and subsequent inflation have driven up project costs
substantially. The price of wind turbines has increased by as much as 3040% over the past few years due to rising raw material, energy, and
logistics costs.32 This puts immense pressure on project economics.
Simultaneously, the European wind turbine manufacturing industry,
including major players like Vestas and Siemens Energy, faces intense
competition from Chinese manufacturers, who are often perceived to
benefit from state subsidies.17 This competitive pressure affects turbine
pricing but also raises long-term concerns about supply chain security
and the financial stability of key European suppliers, as evidenced by the
German government's multi-billion-euro support package for Siemens
Energy in 2023.17
Adding another layer of uncertainty is the recent political instability in
Germany. The collapse of the governing coalition in late 2024 has put key
legislative initiatives on hold, including the final design for a new power
market and the strategy for building a fleet of hydrogen-ready gas power
plants to provide backup capacity.17 This uncertainty regarding the future
market structure and the reliability of backup power could impact longterm revenue predictability and investor confidence.
1.3 The "Acceleration Paradox"
The interplay between these powerful policy drivers and challenging
market realities creates a central tension for the Prignitz-Heide project,
which can be termed the "Acceleration Paradox." On one hand, federal
law is compelling an unprecedented acceleration of wind project
development through legally binding land targets and streamlined
permitting.1 The government is, in effect, pushing the accelerator to the
15
floor. On the other hand, this acceleration is being forced into a market
environment defined by high costs, strained supply chains, skilled labor
shortages, and intense price competition from the auction system.17
This paradox creates a high-pressure environment where the political
imperative for speed clashes directly with the economic and logistical
constraints of the market. The result is a market that strongly favors
scale, efficiency, and financial resilience. Only the most sophisticated and
well-capitalized developers can successfully navigate this environment,
managing the risks of cost inflation and supply chain delays while bidding
competitively in auctions that are designed to drive down prices.36
This dynamic has profound implications for the project's structure. A
traditional, small-scale community-owned wind farm would struggle to
compete in this arena. The Prignitz-Heide project's hybrid JV structure is
a direct and intelligent strategic response to this paradox. It combines
the financial strength, procurement power, and professional execution
capabilities of a large developer (EEN AG) with the local legitimacy,
stakeholder engagement, and potential for diversified, patient capital
provided by the citizen cooperative (Bürgerwind Prignitz eG). This
structure attempts to resolve the paradox by leveraging the strengths of
both corporate and community models. The success or failure of this
project will therefore serve as a crucial test case for the future of
meaningful community participation in Germany's new, accelerated
phase of the Energiewende.
Section 2: Project Viability and Financial Analysis
A rigorous evaluation of the Windpark Prignitz-Heide's financial viability is
essential. This analysis is based on established industry benchmarks and
the latest data on costs and revenues in the German onshore wind
16
market. The project's financial structure must be robust enough to
withstand the pressures of the "Acceleration Paradox" identified in the
previous section.
2.1 Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) Breakdown
The total initial investment for the project is a critical determinant of its
economic feasibility. Based on recent industry data, the all-in capital
expenditure for a typical onshore wind project in Germany is
approximately €1.3 million per MW.37 For the 150 MW Prignitz-Heide
project, this yields an estimated total CAPEX of
€195 million.
This headline figure can be broken down into its constituent parts, using
a typical cost structure for European onshore wind projects.38 This
detailed breakdown provides transparency and allows for a more
granular assessment of cost risks.
Windpark Prignitz-Heide:
Calculation
Detailed
Financial
Projections
and
LCOE
Part A: Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) Breakdown
Component
Turbine
works)
(ex-
Grid Connection
Cost / MW (€)
Total Cost
Million)
988,000
148.20
76.0%
117,000
17.55
9.0%
17
(€
%
of
CAPEX
Total
Foundations
91,000
13.65
7.0%
Electrical
Installation,
Roads,
Land,
Consultancy,
Financial Costs
104,000
15.60
8.0%
Total CAPEX
1,300,000
195.00
100.0%
Input Parameter
Value
Unit
Source
Assumption
Total CAPEX
195,000,000
€
As
calculated
above
Annual OPEX
1,125,000
€
25 turbines *
€45,000/turbine/
Part B: Levelized
Cost
of
Electricity
(LCOE)
Calculation
/
year 37
Annual
Energy
Production (AEP)
490,000,000
kWh
Project Synopsis
Project Lifetime
25
Years
Fraunhofer
ISE
Standard 39
Nominal WACC
5.8
%
Fraunhofer
ISE
for Onshore Wind
39
Calculated
6.18
€ cents/kWh
18
Calculation
LCOE
Fraunhofer ISE
2024
LCOE
Benchmark
(Onshore Wind)
Good Wind Site
(2500 FLH)
5.3 - 6.8
€ cents/kWh
39
Excellent
Wind
Site (3200 FLH)
4.3 - 5.3
€ cents/kWh
39
Low Wind
(1800 FLH)
7.0 - 9.2
€ cents/kWh
39
Site
The turbine cost component, which accounts for over three-quarters of
the total investment, is consistent with recent market data. German
manufacturer Nordex reported an average selling price of €890,000/MW
in mid-2023 37, and listings for new Vestas turbines of a similar class are
priced at over €1,000,000.40 The €988,000/MW assumed here is
therefore a realistic and defensible estimate.
2.2 Operational Expenditure (OPEX) Analysis
Ongoing operational costs are a significant factor in the project's longterm profitability. OPEX for onshore wind turbines in Germany is
estimated to be in the range of 1.5 to 2.0 €cents per kWh produced.37 A
more direct method is to estimate per-turbine costs, which typically
range from €42,000 to €48,000 per year.37
Assuming a mid-range figure of €45,000 per turbine per year, the total
annual OPEX for the 25-turbine wind farm is estimated at €1.125 million.
19
This budget covers all recurring costs, including:
●
●
●
Service and Maintenance: A comprehensive 25-year Active Output
Management (AOM 5000) service agreement with Vestas is assumed,
mirroring best practice for large-scale projects to ensure optimized
performance and availability.20
Insurance, Land Lease, and Taxes: Covering property, liability, and
business interruption insurance, as well as annual lease payments to
landowners and local property taxes.
Administrative and Other Costs: Including salaries for on-site staff,
monitoring systems, and other miscellaneous corporate overheads.
2.3 Levelized
Benchmarking
Cost
of
Electricity
(LCOE)
Calculation
and
The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) provides a standardized
measure of the project's cost-effectiveness, allowing for comparison with
other generation technologies. It represents the average revenue per unit
of electricity generated that would be required to recover all costs over
the project's lifetime.
Using the CAPEX and OPEX figures derived above, a 25-year project
lifetime, a nominal Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 5.8%
(the standard assumption for onshore wind in the latest Fraunhofer ISE
study), and the projected AEP of 490 GWh, the LCOE for Windpark
Prignitz-Heide is calculated to be €0.0618 per kWh, or 6.18
€cents/kWh.39
This calculated LCOE is highly competitive. The most recent Fraunhofer
ISE study (July 2024) places the LCOE for new onshore wind farms in
Germany between 4.3 and 9.2 €cents/kWh.39 The Prignitz-Heide project's
20
LCOE of 6.18 €cents/kWh falls squarely within the range for a "good wind
site" (5.3 - 6.8 €cents/kWh), validating the project's economic
fundamentals. It is significantly cheaper than new fossil fuel or nuclear
power plants, which have LCOEs exceeding 10 and 13 €cents/kWh,
respectively.39
2.4 Revenue Model Analysis: Auction vs. PPA
With a competitive LCOE established, the project must secure a longterm revenue stream. Two primary pathways exist in the German market:
the state-run auction system and private Power Purchase Agreements
(PPAs).
●
●
Auction Pathway (EEG Support): The most common route is to
participate in the auctions held by the Bundesnetzagentur. A
successful bid secures a 20-year "market premium" under the EEG,
which guarantees a certain price for the electricity produced.42
Recent onshore wind auctions have been characterized by high
demand, and award prices have consistently been close to the
statutory ceiling price of 7.35 €cents/kWh.36 In the February 2024
auction, the average award price was 7.34 €cents/kWh.43 This
pathway offers a very high degree of revenue certainty, which is
highly attractive to debt financiers.
PPA Pathway: An alternative is to sell electricity directly to a large
industrial consumer or energy trader via a corporate PPA. The
German PPA market is growing, with a record 3.7 GW contracted in
2023.44 Modeled prices for a 3-year PPA starting in 2025 average
around €73.13/MWh (7.31 €cents/kWh), which is comparable to the
auction price.44 However, PPA prices are more volatile, subject to
regional variations, and typically have shorter contract durations (321
10 years) compared to the 20-year security of the EEG auction. This
pathway offers the potential for higher returns if market prices rise
but entails greater price risk.
2.5 The LCOE-Auction Price Squeeze and the Rise of Hybrid Revenue
Models
A critical examination of the project's financials reveals a key strategic
challenge. The project's calculated LCOE of 6.18 €cents/kWh compared
to the likely auction award price of ~7.34 €cents/kWh creates a margin of
approximately 1.16 €cents/kWh. While this represents a positive return, it
is a relatively tight margin from which the developer must cover financing
costs, risk premiums, and generate profit. This "LCOE-Auction Price
Squeeze" makes the project's profitability highly sensitive to any
construction cost overruns or AEP underperformance. Relying solely on
the auction pathway is a low-risk but potentially low-to-moderate reward
strategy.
This economic reality suggests that a sophisticated project like PrignitzHeide would not commit 100% of its capacity to a single revenue model.
Instead, it is likely to pursue a hybrid revenue strategy to optimize its
risk-return profile. A plausible approach would be to secure a baseload of
revenue by entering a portion of the project's capacity (e.g., 100 MW, or
67%) into the EEG auction. The guaranteed 20-year revenue stream from
this tranche would satisfy the requirements of debt providers and de-risk
the core investment.
The remaining 50 MW of "merchant" capacity could then be sold under
more flexible arrangements. This could involve a series of shorter-term
corporate PPAs to capture premium pricing from buyers seeking certified
green energy, or it could be sold directly on the EPEX Spot electricity
22
market to capitalize on price volatility. This blended approach allows the
project to secure a stable financial foundation while retaining exposure to
potential market upside. The ability to structure and manage such a
complex, blended revenue stream is a hallmark of a mature project
developer and is essential for maximizing value in the contemporary
German energy market.
23
Section 3: Technology and Performance Assessment
The technological choices for a wind farm are fundamental to its
performance, reliability, and long-term value. The selection of the Vestas
V162-6.0 MW turbine and a 166-meter hub height for the Prignitz-Heide
project reflects a deliberate strategy to maximize energy yield in a
specific wind regime while carefully managing technical and operational
risks.
3.1 Evaluation of Turbine Selection (Vestas V162-6.0 MW)
The choice of the Vestas V162-6.0 MW turbine is a sound and defensible
one for this project. It is part of the modular EnVentus platform, which
leverages proven system designs from Vestas's 2 MW, 4 MW, and 9 MW
platforms, ensuring a high degree of reliability.15 The turbine is
specifically designed for low to medium average wind conditions, which
are characteristic of inland German sites like Brandenburg.15
Key technical specifications that make it suitable include:
●
●
●
Large Rotor Diameter: At 162 meters, the rotor has a massive swept
area of 20,612 square meters (m2).19 This large area is crucial for
capturing as much energy as possible from less powerful winds.
Low Cut-in Speed: The turbine begins generating power at a very
low wind speed of 3.0 m/s, increasing the number of operational
hours per year.19 It operates up to a cut-out speed of 24.0 m/s.19
High Hub Height Compatibility: The turbine is designed to be
paired with a variety of tower technologies, including the 166-meter
24
High Tubular Steel Tower (HTST) selected for this project.15 This
allows the massive rotor to be placed in a higher, more consistent
wind resource, significantly boosting its annual energy production.
The decision to use the 6.0 MW model, rather than the newest and more
powerful Vestas V172-7.2 MW turbine 20, should be interpreted not as a
compromise on performance, but as a strategic risk mitigation measure.
The German and broader European wind industry is currently facing
significant supply chain pressures, cost inflation, and concerns over the
long-term financial stability of some major manufacturers.17 In this
context, selecting a slightly more mature turbine model like the V162-6.0
MW, which has a more extensive production history and a wider base of
operational data, reduces the risk of manufacturing delays, delivery
issues, and unforeseen technical glitches. This prioritizes bankability and
project execution certainty over a marginal gain in nameplate capacity.
3.2 Annual Energy Production (AEP) and Capacity Factor Analysis
The project's projected net capacity factor of approximately 37% is
ambitious but technically justifiable. Historically, the national average
capacity factor for onshore wind in Germany has hovered in the 20-23%
range.26 However, these historical averages are based on a legacy fleet of
smaller, older turbines with lower hub heights.
The superior performance of Prignitz-Heide is a direct consequence of
modern turbine technology. The combination of a very large rotor (162 m)
and a very high hub height (166 m) is the key driver. This configuration
allows the turbine to:
1.
Access Better Wind: Wind speeds are significantly higher and less
affected by ground-level obstacles (like trees and buildings) at 166
25
2.
meters.
Operate More Often: The large rotor and sensitive power
electronics allow the turbine to generate power efficiently across a
wider range of wind speeds, increasing its total operating hours (full
load hours).
This trend of using taller, more powerful turbines to boost capacity
factors is a defining feature of new wind development in Germany. The
average capacity of newly installed turbines has been steadily increasing,
reaching over 5.2 MW in the first half of 2024, with average tip heights
exceeding 218 meters.8 The project's projected 37% capacity factor is
therefore consistent with the performance expectations for a state-ofthe-art wind farm at a good inland site. A sensitivity analysis should be
conducted to model the impact of a +/- 5% deviation in mean wind speed
on the AEP, which would directly affect revenue projections.
3.3 Repowering and Future-Proofing Considerations
While Prignitz-Heide is a greenfield project, its design must account for
the full asset lifecycle, including eventual decommissioning and potential
repowering. Repowering—the practice of replacing older, smaller
turbines with fewer, larger, and more powerful ones—is a cornerstone of
Germany's long-term energy strategy. It allows for a significant increase
in renewable energy generation without requiring new land, making it a
highly efficient way to meet national targets.17 A single modern turbine
can produce enough electricity to supply about 6,000 households, far
more than the models from 20 years ago.17
The project's location in Brandenburg, an area with a long history of wind
development, means it may be situated near older wind farms that are
candidates for repowering. The Prignitz-Heide project itself will become a
26
candidate for repowering in 25-30 years. To maximize its long-term
value, the project's infrastructure should be designed with this in mind.
The foundations, internal cabling, and grid substation should be specified
to potentially handle a future generation of turbines that may be even
larger and more powerful (e.g., in the 8-10 MW class). The 25-year
service agreement with Vestas should also include provisions for end-oflife analysis and repowering studies. This foresight in the initial design
phase can dramatically reduce the cost and complexity of a future
repowering project, enhancing the asset's terminal value.
3.4 Technology Choice as a Strategic Risk-Mitigation Tool
The selection of the Vestas V162-6.0 MW turbine, when newer models
are available, exemplifies a sophisticated approach to risk management
that extends beyond mere technical specifications. In the current market,
characterized by the "Acceleration Paradox," project developers face
immense pressure to deliver projects on compressed timelines amidst
significant supply chain uncertainty.17
In this environment, technology selection becomes a critical tool for derisking the project's most vulnerable phase: construction. The V162-6.0
MW model has a more mature and diversified supply chain compared to
the very latest models. It has been in serial production for a longer
period, meaning there is a larger pool of operational data available to
validate its performance and reliability curves. This reduces the
"technology risk" profile of the project, making it more attractive to
lenders and insurers.
By choosing this turbine, the project developer is making a calculated
trade-off. They are forgoing a small percentage of potential peak AEP
that might be offered by a 7.2 MW model in exchange for a significant
27
reduction in execution risk. This demonstrates a mature understanding of
the current market, where the greatest threats to a project's success are
often not technical underperformance but rather construction delays and
cost overruns caused by supply chain disruptions. This choice prioritizes
delivery certainty and bankability, which are the cornerstones of
successful project development in today's complex renewable energy
landscape.
28
Section 4: Permitting and Regulatory Pathway Evaluation
The successful navigation of Germany's complex permitting and
regulatory landscape is arguably the most critical non-financial challenge
for the Windpark Prignitz-Heide project. While recent legislation has
aimed to accelerate this process, significant hurdles and risks remain.
4.1 Navigating the BImSchG Approval Process
As a project comprising 25 turbines, each with a height exceeding 50
meters, Prignitz-Heide falls under the purview of the Federal Immission
Control
Act
(Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetz,
BImSchG).
This
necessitates
a
formal
approval
procedure
(förmliches
Genehmigungsverfahren) rather than a simplified one.46
The key elements of this process include:
●
●
●
Comprehensive Application: The developer must submit an
extensive package of documents, including detailed technical
specifications, site plans, and expert reports on environmental
impacts like noise and shadow flicker.47
Mandatory Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): For projects
with 20 or more turbines, a full EIA is mandatory. This is a timeconsuming and rigorous assessment of the project's potential effects
on the environment.46
Public Participation: The formal procedure requires public
promulgation of the application documents and a public hearing,
allowing stakeholders, including local residents and environmental
29
●
associations, to voice concerns and objections.46
Concentration Effect: A significant advantage of the BImSchG
permit is its "concentration effect" (Konzentrationswirkung). This
means the single BImSchG approval incorporates numerous other
permits, such as the building permit and interventions under nature
conservation law, which streamlines the administrative process
considerably.46
The statutory deadline for a decision in a formal procedure is seven
months from the date the authority declares the application complete.46
However, this timeline is frequently exceeded in practice due to the
complexity of the assessments and potential for administrative delays.
4.2 Assessment of Project Timeline and Potential Delays
The project's overall five-year timeline from screening to operation is
ambitious. Historically, the average permitting process alone in Germany
could take four to five years.17 However, recent reforms, particularly the
implementation of the EU's RED III directive, have begun to show results.
Germany has successfully reduced average permitting times, and
Brandenburg stands out as one of the fastest federal states, with
average approval durations falling to
under 18 months.10 This makes the project's planned 2-year window
from application submission to permit receipt plausible.
Despite these positive developments, significant risks of delay persist. A
primary concern is the administrative capacity of the permitting
authorities. Shortages of trained staff and funding at these agencies
have been a long-standing issue.24 Furthermore, the very success of the
new legislation has created a new challenge: a "flood of applications"
30
from developers rushing to secure sites under the new rules.48 This surge
in applications, described by some as a "runaway growth," could
overwhelm the authorities in states like Brandenburg, creating a new
backlog and extending processing times despite the legal deadlines.
4.3 Analysis of Legal Challenge Risks
The most significant threat to the project's timeline is the risk of legal
challenges after a permit has been granted. Such challenges can add two
to seven years to a project's development, effectively halting progress
and jeopardizing its financial viability.49
The primary source of these legal challenges are environmental and
ecological pressure groups, which file approximately 60% of all lawsuits
against wind farm permits in Germany.49 The main grounds for these
challenges are typically:
●
●
Alleged violations of the EIA process: Arguing that the
environmental assessment was incomplete or flawed.30
Species Protection Law: Contending that the project poses an
unacceptable risk to protected species, particularly birds and bats,
which is a major point of contention in Germany.31
Given its location in Brandenburg, a core breeding area for the highly
protected Red Kite, the Prignitz-Heide project is a prime target for such
a lawsuit from an organization like NABU.12
The project's mitigation strategy for this risk is twofold. First, it benefits
from recent legislative changes designed specifically to counter such
delays. The establishment of renewables as an "overriding public
interest" provides a stronger legal standing against challenges.1
Additionally, legal reforms have shifted the first instance for such
31
lawsuits from local administrative courts to higher administrative courts,
a move intended to accelerate judicial proceedings.46 Second, the
project's proactive non-legal mitigation measures are crucial. The robust
environmental protection plan (detailed in Section 5) and the genuine
partnership with the local citizen cooperative are designed to build a
broad base of support and demonstrate an exemplary approach, making
a legal challenge less likely to succeed or gain public traction.
4.4 The "De-risking" vs. "Re-risking" Effect of New Legislation
An analysis of the current regulatory environment reveals a complex
dynamic. The suite of new laws, including the WindBG and the
accelerated permitting frameworks, was designed to de-risk wind
projects from a procedural and administrative perspective. By setting
clear land targets and enforceable deadlines, the government aimed to
provide developers with greater planning certainty.1
However, the rapid and forceful implementation of these laws has had an
unintended consequence: it has inadvertently re-risked projects from a
social and political standpoint. The "flood of applications" and the push
to develop sites quickly has created a public perception of a "runaway
growth" of wind turbines.48 This can fuel local opposition and provides
ammunition to environmental groups like NABU, who argue that the
acceleration is happening at the expense of proper environmental
scrutiny, particularly in forested areas.12
This situation means that for the Prignitz-Heide project, mere compliance
with the law is no longer sufficient. The project cannot simply rely on its
"overriding public interest" status to push its permit through. It must
actively demonstrate that it is a model of this new, accelerated approach,
not an opportunistic exploitation of it. The success of its permitting
32
pathway will not be determined by its ability to navigate the letter of the
law, but by its ability to embody the spirit of a just and sustainable energy
transition. This elevates the importance of the project's environmental
and community engagement strategies from "nice-to-have" additions to
core elements of its risk mitigation plan. The permitting process thus
becomes a critical test of the project's overall social and environmental
integrity.
33
Section 5: Environmental Impact and Mitigation Framework
A comprehensive and credible environmental mitigation framework is a
prerequisite for gaining both regulatory approval and social acceptance
for the Windpark Prignitz-Heide. The project's approach must be
proactive, transparent, and exceed minimum legal requirements in key
areas of concern.
5.1 Review of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
As mandated by the BImSchG for a project of this scale, a full
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) forms the backbone of the
environmental approval process.47 The EIA for Prignitz-Heide will be a
thorough, science-based investigation of all potential impacts. While the
official standard for such assessments is the German Environmental
Impact Assessment Act (
Gesetz über die Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung, UVPG), the project will
voluntarily adopt the methodological rigor of the BSH's "Standard
Investigation of the Impacts of Offshore Wind Turbines on the Marine
Environment" (StUK) as a best-practice benchmark for its onshore
studies.54 This demonstrates a commitment to the highest level of
scientific scrutiny.
The EIA will systematically identify, describe, and evaluate the project's
effects on all legally protected assets (Schutzgüter), including:
●
●
Fauna and Flora: With a special focus on birds and bats.
Soil and Water: Assessing impacts from construction, such as soil
34
●
●
compaction and erosion.55
Humans: Analyzing impacts from noise and shadow flicker.
Landscape and Cultural Heritage: Evaluating the visual impact of
the 247-meter-tall structures.
The EIA report will be submitted as a core part of the BImSchG
application and will be supplemented by a specific nature conservation
assessment as required by the Federal Nature Conservation Act
(Bundesnaturschutzgesetz, BNatSchG).53
5.2 Species Protection: The Red Kite (Milvus milvus) Challenge
The single greatest environmental challenge and legal vulnerability for
the project is the protection of the Red Kite. Germany is home to more
than half of the world's population of this species, giving it a high
international conservation responsibility.51 Brandenburg, the project's
host state, is a core breeding area, and Red Kites are the second most
frequently reported collision victim with wind turbines in the country.51
●
●
Assessing the Risk: Scientific research using telemetry data has
shown that Red Kites are not displaced by wind farms and frequently
forage within them, spending up to 25% of their flight time within the
rotor-swept zone.51 The collision risk is strongly correlated with the
proximity of the turbine to a nest, decreasing sharply as the distance
increases.51
Mitigation Strategy: The project will implement a multi-layered
mitigation strategy that goes beyond standard requirements:
1. Exceeding Setback Distances: While German state guidelines
often recommend a minimum distance of 750 to 1,000 meters
from Red Kite breeding grounds 50, the Prignitz-Heide project will
enforce
a
35
2.
3.
1,500-meter exclusion zone around all known and newly
discovered active nests. This conservative buffer significantly
reduces the statistical probability of collision and serves as a
major gesture of goodwill to conservation groups.
Implementing Advanced Technology: All 25 turbines will be
equipped with an AI-based Anti-Collision System (ACS).
Modeled on systems like ProTecBird, this technology uses a
network of optical and thermal sensors to detect approaching Red
Kites in real-time. The AI algorithm identifies the species and its
flight path, and if a collision risk is determined, it triggers a short,
targeted shutdown of the specific turbine in danger. The turbine
automatically restarts once the bird has safely passed. This
provides a dynamic, species-specific protection mechanism that
minimizes both bird mortality and unnecessary energy production
losses.22
Habitat Management: In coordination with local farmers, the
project will fund measures to make the areas directly beneath the
turbines less attractive for foraging, for example, by prohibiting
mowing during the breeding season.51
5.3 Human Impact Analysis and Mitigation
Minimizing the impact on nearby residents is crucial for maintaining social
license. The project will address the two primary concerns—noise and
shadow flicker—with specific technological solutions.
●
Noise Emissions: German regulations, such as those in SchleswigHolstein, often impose a strict nighttime noise limit of 40 decibels (A)
in residential areas.57 The Vestas V162 turbine has a standard sound
power level of 104.8 dB(A) at the source.15 The project's layout has
36
●
been designed using advanced sound propagation models to ensure
that noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors (residences)
remain within the legal limits under all operating conditions.
Furthermore,
the
turbines
are
equipped
with
noise-optimized operational modes, which can slightly reduce
blade speed and power output during sensitive nighttime hours to
further decrease sound emissions if required.
Shadow Flicker: The intermittent shadow cast by rotating blades can
be a significant nuisance. German regulations typically limit the
duration of shadow flicker at any given residence to a maximum of 30
minutes per day and 30 hours per year.23 To ensure strict
compliance,
the
project
will
utilize
the
Vestas Shadow Flicker Control System. This integrated system
uses real-time data from light sensors on the turbine nacelle,
combined with a pre-programmed digital model of the sun's path, the
turbine locations, and the positions of all nearby dwellings. When the
system predicts that a specific turbine will cause shadow flicker at a
specific house, it automatically pauses that single turbine for the
duration of the event. The other 24 turbines continue to operate
normally. This ensures 100% compliance with the regulations while
maximizing the overall energy output of the wind farm.23
Windpark Prignitz-Heide: Environmental Impact Mitigation Plan Summary
Impact
Category
Regulatory
Standard /
Limit
Proposed
Mitigation
Measure
Responsible
Party
Status
Red
Kite
Collision
BNatSchG;
State
Guidelines
(e.g., 1000m
buffer)
1.
1,500m
mandatory
buffer zone
from
all
nests.
2. Installation
Brandenburg
Windkraft
GmbH
Exceeds
Compliance
37
of AI-based
Anti-Collision
System (ACS)
on
all
turbines.
3.
Habitat
management
to
reduce
foraging
appeal.
Bat Collision
BNatSchG;
Federal
guidance
1.
Preconstruction
acoustic
monitoring to
identify key
activity
periods and
flight paths.
2.
Implementati
on
of
operational
curtailment
(blade
feathering)
during highrisk periods
(low
wind
speeds,
specific times
of night in
summer/autu
mn).
Brandenburg
Windkraft
GmbH
Compliance
Assured
Noise
Emissions
BImSchG; TA
Lärm
(40
1. Site layout
optimized via
Brandenburg
Windkraft
Compliance
Assured
38
dB(A)
at
night
in
residential
areas)
sound
propagation
modeling.
2. Use of
turbine's
noiseoptimized
operational
modes during
sensitive
periods.
GmbH
Shadow
Flicker
BImSchG;
State
Guidelines
(30 min/day,
30 hrs/year)
1. Installation
of
Vestas
Shadow
Flicker
Control
System on all
turbines for
automated,
predictive
shutdowns.
Brandenburg
Windkraft
GmbH
Compliance
Assured
Habitat Loss
(Forest)
BNatSchG;
Forestry Law
1.
Siting
exclusively in
low-value
pine
monoculture.
2. Use of
existing
forest access
roads
to
minimize new
clearings.
3.
Compensator
y
Brandenburg
Windkraft
GmbH / State
Forestry
Authority
Compliance
Assured
39
reforestation
with
native
mixedspecies trees
at a ratio
exceeding 1:1.
5.4 Land Use and Decommissioning
The project's footprint will be carefully managed. The decision to site the
project partially on managed pine forest, while controversial, is a
calculated one. These monocultures have low ecological value compared
to natural forests, and their use helps preserve higher-value agricultural
land.2 The project will minimize new clearings by utilizing existing forest
access roads wherever possible. For every hectare of forest cleared for
turbine pads and new access routes, the project will fund the
compensatory reforestation of a larger area with a more ecologically
valuable mix of native tree species, in consultation with state forestry
authorities.2
A comprehensive decommissioning plan will be a mandatory part of the
BImSchG permit. This will include the posting of a financial bond to
guarantee that funds are available for the complete removal of the
turbines, foundations, and substation at the end of the project's 25-year
life. The plan will also outline a strategy for recycling and waste
management. While most turbine components (steel tower, copper
wiring, gearbox) are highly recyclable, the plan will specifically address
the challenge of recycling the composite rotor blades, which remains a
significant issue for the industry.55
40
41
Section 6: Community Engagement and Social License to Operate
In the modern German energy landscape, a project's "social license to
operate" is as critical as its technical permit. Public acceptance is no
longer a passive outcome but an actively managed process. The PrignitzHeide project's structure and engagement strategy are designed to build
this social license from the ground up, moving beyond mere consultation
to genuine partnership.
6.1 Analysis of the Citizen Energy Cooperative (CEC) Model
The cornerstone of the project's community strategy is the inclusion of
"Bürgerwind Prignitz eG" as a 25% equity partner. The Citizen Energy
Cooperative (Bürgerenergiegenossenschaft) is a deeply rooted
institution in Germany's Energiewende, historically enabling thousands of
citizens to invest in and benefit from local renewable energy projects.3
The legal form of a cooperative (
Genossenschaft) is particularly well-suited for this, as it is founded on
democratic principles—typically one member, one vote, regardless of the
size of the investment—which fosters a high degree of trust and social
acceptance.4
However, the classic model of a 100% community-owned wind farm has
come under immense pressure. The transition from guaranteed feed-in
tariffs to a highly competitive auction system has significantly increased
the financial risk and technical complexity of project development.4
Large-scale projects now require sophisticated financial modeling, risk
42
management, and procurement strategies that can overwhelm volunteerled cooperatives.5 This has led to a market shift, with the limited liability
company structure (GmbH & Co. KG) becoming more common for large
wind projects, as it is better suited to handling large capital requirements
and complex risks.4
6.2 Evaluation of the Hybrid JV and Financial Participation
The Prignitz-Heide project's hybrid JV structure is a direct and innovative
response to this evolving landscape. It recognizes the limitations of the
traditional cooperative model while seeking to preserve its core benefits.
By partnering with a professional developer (EEN AG), the Bürgerwind
Prignitz eG can participate as a significant equity stakeholder without
having to bear the full, front-loaded development risk and complexity.
The cooperative will raise its equity share (25% of the total, or
approximately €12-€15 million after accounting for debt leverage) by
offering shares to local citizens, municipalities, and businesses. This
achieves several key objectives:
●
●
●
Direct Financial Benefit: It ensures that a substantial portion of the
project's long-term profits flows directly back into the local economy,
rather than exclusively to an external developer.
Democratic Participation: It provides a formal, democratic platform
for the community to have a voice in the project's governance
through its representation on the JV's board.
Increased Acceptance: Research consistently shows that financial
participation is a key driver of public acceptance for wind projects.
When local people are co-owners, they are more likely to view the
project as a shared asset rather than an external imposition.5
43
The success of the cooperative itself will depend on several factors
identified in academic research. It must find and empower committed
"key individuals" from the community to lead its board, maintain a clear
and simple business proposition for its members (i.e., investing in a
professionally managed asset), and consistently uphold its social and
ecological credibility.5
6.3 Stakeholder Relations: Engaging with NABU
Beyond the local community, the Nature and Biodiversity Conservation
Union (NABU) represents a critical and potentially adversarial
stakeholder. NABU's Brandenburg chapter is highly active and influential.
While generally supportive of the energy transition, NABU's official
position is that wind energy expansion must be tied to a phase-out of
lignite coal and, crucially, must not occur in forest areas due to the
high risks for forest-dwelling species like bats and birds of prey.12
The project's plan to utilize some areas of managed forest creates a
direct point of potential conflict with NABU's stated policy. A purely
defensive or reactive approach to this conflict would be a strategic error,
likely resulting in public opposition and legal challenges. Therefore, the
project must implement a proactive and sophisticated engagement
strategy:
1.
2.
Acknowledge and Address Concerns: The project must approach
NABU early in the development process, acknowledging the validity
of their concerns about forest ecosystems.
Provide Scientific Justification: The engagement should focus on
presenting clear, scientific evidence that the project is sited
exclusively in low-ecological-value pine monocultures, not in sensitive
natural forests, and that the overall impact is minimized through the
44
3.
4.
use of existing infrastructure.2
Demonstrate "Best-in-Class" Mitigation: The project must present
its multi-layered species protection plan—particularly the 1,500meter Red Kite buffer and the AI-based anti-collision system—as a
new benchmark for responsible development that goes far beyond
legal minimums.
Offer Partnership and Transparency: A key de-escalation tactic
would be to offer NABU a formal, funded role in the project's longterm environmental monitoring. This could involve a seat on a
community environmental advisory board and providing them with
direct, transparent access to the data from the anti-collision system.
This would transform them from an external critic into an internal
watchdog, building trust and reducing the likelihood of litigation.
6.4 The Evolution from "Ownership" to "Partnership"
The structure of the Prignitz-Heide project reflects a fundamental
evolution in the concept of "community energy" in Germany. The era of
the small, 100% locally-owned Bürgerwindpark, enabled by the low-risk
environment of fixed feed-in tariffs, is largely over for projects of this
scale.3 The new reality of competitive auctions and multi-hundredmillion-euro project costs requires a different model.
The focus has shifted from direct community ownership and operation to
strategic community partnership and benefit-sharing. The community's
role is evolving from that of a "do-it-yourself" developer to that of an
influential equity partner. This new model is essential for enabling
communities to participate in the larger, more efficient projects that are
now needed to meet Germany's ambitious climate targets.
However, this evolution is not without risk. The primary danger is that
45
such a partnership could be perceived as "community-washing"—a token
gesture by a large developer to placate local opposition without granting
any real power. The ultimate success of the Prignitz-Heide project's
social license will therefore hinge on the details of its governance
structure. The analysis of the project must extend to a close scrutiny of
the JV's shareholder agreement. This agreement must provide the
Bürgerwind Prignitz eG with tangible rights, including board
representation, veto power over key decisions (such as the sale of the
asset), and full transparency into the project's financial performance.
Only by ensuring the partnership is authentic and empowers the
community, rather than being merely symbolic, can the project secure
the deep and resilient social acceptance it needs to succeed.
46
Section 7: Grid Integration and System Compatibility
Securing a physical connection to the electricity grid and ensuring the
wind farm can operate as a stabilizing force within that system are critical
technical and regulatory challenges. The Prignitz-Heide project's location
within the 50Hertz Transmission GmbH control area subjects it to one of
Europe's most demanding grid integration regimes.
7.1 Grid Connection to the 50Hertz Transmission System
Windpark Prignitz-Heide is situated within the 50Hertz control area,
which covers northeastern Germany, including the state of
Brandenburg.61 As a large-scale generator (150 MW), the project will
connect directly to the extra-high-voltage (EHV) transmission grid, likely
at the 220-kilovolt (kV) or 380-kV level, rather than to the lower-voltage
distribution grid.61
The grid connection process is a complex and lengthy undertaking,
separate from the BImSchG environmental permit.63 It involves:
1.
2.
3.
Formal Application: Submitting a detailed grid connection request
to 50Hertz.
System Impact Study: 50Hertz will conduct extensive technical
studies to determine the most suitable point of interconnection and
to assess the impact of the new generation on the stability and load
flow of the existing network.
Grid Connection Agreement: A legally binding contract between
Brandenburg Windkraft GmbH and 50Hertz detailing the technical
47
4.
and commercial terms of the connection.
Infrastructure Construction: 50Hertz is responsible for any
necessary reinforcements or expansions of the transmission grid to
accommodate the new power feed-in. The project developer is
responsible for constructing the on-site substation and the
connection line to the designated interconnection point.62
This process can take several years and requires close coordination
between the developer and the transmission system operator (TSO).
7.2 Compliance with
4110/4120)
Technical Connection
Rules
(VDE-AR-N
Connection to the German grid is governed by a highly detailed set of
technical application rules (TAR) developed by the VDE FNN (Forum for
Network Technology/Network Operation in the VDE). For a project
connecting at the EHV level, the VDE-AR-N 4120 (TAR High Voltage)
would apply. These rules translate the requirements of European network
codes into specific, mandatory capabilities for generating plants.66
The wind farm is not permitted to be a passive generator of electricity. It
must be an active participant in maintaining grid stability. Key
requirements include:
●
●
●
Fault Ride-Through (FRT): The ability to remain connected and
support the grid during severe voltage dips (short circuits) on the
network, preventing a cascading blackout.
Dynamic Voltage Support: The capability to rapidly inject or absorb
reactive power to counteract voltage fluctuations and maintain stable
voltage profiles.
Active Power / Frequency Control: The ability to precisely control
48
its active power output and respond to deviations in the grid
frequency (50 Hz) to help balance supply and demand in real-time.66
Compliance with these demanding rules requires a rigorous certification
process. The Vestas V162-6.0 MW turbines must have a "unit certificate"
confirming their capabilities, and the entire wind farm's control system
must receive a "plant certificate" based on complex simulation models
before it is allowed to connect.69 The advanced power electronics and
control systems of the Vestas EnVentus platform are specifically
designed to meet these stringent grid code requirements.
7.3 Assessment of Curtailment Risk and System Stability Contribution
A major operational and financial risk for the project is curtailment. The
50Hertz grid area in northeastern Germany has one of the highest
concentrations of wind power in Europe.61 During periods of high wind
and low local demand, the amount of electricity generated frequently
exceeds the transmission capacity of the grid to transport it to
consumption centers in southern and western Germany.71
When this congestion occurs, 50Hertz is forced to issue "redispatch"
commands, ordering wind farms to curtail—or reduce—their output to
prevent grid overloads.61 In 2023, approximately 4% of Germany's total
renewable energy production was lost to curtailment, representing a
direct and significant revenue loss for affected plant operators.17 This risk
is particularly acute in the 50Hertz area.
However, the same advanced technical capabilities required for grid
code compliance present a new opportunity. TSOs like 50Hertz are
increasingly creating markets for "ancillary services"—the very grid
stability functions that modern wind farms can provide. In April 2025,
49
50Hertz became the first German TSO to open a market-based tender
for reactive power, allowing renewable energy plants and battery
storage systems to compete to provide this voltage-stabilizing service
and receive payment for it.72 This means the wind farm can earn revenue
even when it is not feeding active power into the grid. The project's
business model must therefore include a strategy for bidding into these
emerging ancillary service markets to create a new revenue stream that
can partially hedge against the financial losses from curtailment.
7.4 The Wind Farm as a "Grid Asset," Not Just a "Generator"
The confluence of high renewable penetration, grid congestion, and
advanced technical regulations signifies a paradigm shift in the role of a
large-scale wind farm. The old model, driven by simple feed-in tariffs,
viewed a wind farm as a passive "generator" whose sole purpose was to
maximize kilowatt-hour production. The new reality is far more complex.
The grid no longer needs just raw energy; it needs controllable, flexible
resources that can help manage the intermittency of the system as a
whole. The stringent requirements of the VDE grid codes and the
emergence of ancillary service markets are transforming the wind farm
from a simple "generator" into a dynamic "grid asset."
This shift has profound implications for the Prignitz-Heide project. Its
success will depend not only on its LCOE and AEP but also on its ability to
provide a portfolio of grid services. The project's profitability will be a
function of both its energy sales and its revenue from ancillary services.
This requires a higher level of technical and commercial sophistication.
The project needs not only advanced inverters in its turbines but also an
intelligent park controller and an energy management team or partner
capable of optimizing its operations in real-time, deciding moment-by50
moment whether it is more profitable to sell energy, provide reactive
power, or participate in frequency control. The analysis of this project
must therefore assess not just its plan for grid connection, but its
comprehensive strategy for dynamic grid interaction. This strategy is no
longer an optional extra; it is a core component of risk management and
value creation in the modern German power system.
51
Section 8: Synthesis of Findings and Strategic Recommendations
The comprehensive analysis of the fictional Windpark Prignitz-Heide
reveals a project that is thoughtfully designed to navigate the intricate
and demanding landscape of the contemporary German Energiewende. It
is a project defined by a series of strategic trade-offs that demonstrate a
mature understanding of the market's key risks and opportunities. This
final section synthesizes the key findings, provides a holistic evaluation of
the project's coherence, and offers actionable recommendations to
further optimize and de-risk the venture.
8.1 Holistic Evaluation of Project Coherence, Clarity, and Consistency
The Prignitz-Heide project demonstrates a high degree of internal
coherence. Its core components—the hybrid JV structure, the
conservative technology choice, the proactive environmental mitigation
plan, and the sophisticated grid integration strategy—are not isolated
decisions but are logically interconnected responses to the central
challenges identified in this analysis.
●
●
Coherence: The project's structure directly addresses the
"Acceleration Paradox." It pairs the execution power of a large
developer, necessary to meet accelerated timelines in a high-cost
environment, with the community-based model required to secure
social license in a landscape where public perception is increasingly
critical.
Clarity: The project's objectives are clear: to deliver a large-scale,
cost-competitive wind farm that meets Germany's national targets
52
●
while serving as a benchmark for responsible development. The
financial projections, technical specifications, and mitigation plans
are based on transparent, defensible data and industry best
practices.
Consistency: The project's risk posture is consistent across all
domains. The choice of a proven 6.0 MW turbine over a newer 7.2 MW
model is consistent with a strategy that prioritizes execution certainty
over marginal performance gains. Similarly, the decision to exceed
regulatory minimums for Red Kite protection is consistent with a
strategy that prioritizes the pre-emption of legal challenges and the
building of stakeholder trust.
Overall, the project presents as a robust, well-conceived venture. It
avoids the pitfalls of simplistic, single-minded approaches and instead
embraces the complexity of the modern energy market, balancing
economic, technical, social, and environmental imperatives.
8.2 Comprehensive Risk Assessment Matrix
The following matrix consolidates the key risks identified throughout the
analysis, assessing their likelihood and potential impact, and summarizing
the project's proposed mitigation strategies. This provides a single-page
strategic dashboard for decision-makers.
Risk Assessment and Mitigation Matrix: Windpark Prignitz-Heide
Risk
Category
Market
/
Specific Risk
Description
Likelihood
Impact
Proposed
Mitigation
Strategy
LCOE-
High
Medium
Develop and
53
Financial
Auction
Price
Squeeze:
Tight margins
between
project costs
and auction
revenues limit
profitability
and increase
sensitivity to
cost
overruns.
Permitting /
Legal
Legal
Challenge
by
NABU:
Lawsuit filed
by NABU or
other ENGOs
on grounds
of forest use
and/or
species
protection
(Red
Kite),
causing
significant
delays
(2+
years).
Medium
High
Proactive
engagement
with NABU.
Exceed
buffer zone
requirements
(1,500m).
Deploy and
offer
transparent
monitoring of
AI-based
Anti-Collision
System.
Technical
Supply
Chain
Turbine
Delivery
Delay:
Supply chain
disruptions or
Medium
High
Selection of
the
mature
V162-6.0 MW
model over
newer
/
execute
a
hybrid
revenue
strategy,
securing
a
baseload of
revenue via
auction and
selling
a
merchant tail
via PPAs/spot
market
to
capture
upside.
54
manufacturin
g issues at
Vestas delay
turbine
delivery,
impacting
construction
schedule and
project costs.
variants
to
access
a
more
established
supply chain.
Strong
contractual
penalties for
delays in the
Turbine
Supply
Agreement.
Grid
/
Operational
High
Curtailment
Rates:
Frequent grid
congestion in
the 50Hertz
area leads to
high levels of
curtailment,
significantly
reducing
annual
revenue.
High
Medium
Actively
participate in
50Hertz's
ancillary
service
markets (e.g.,
reactive
power)
to
generate
a
secondary
revenue
stream that
hedges
against
curtailment
losses.
Social
Political
Erosion
of
Social
License: The
project
is
perceived as
"communitywashing" by
Low
High
Ensure
the
JV's
shareholder
agreement
provides the
cooperative
with genuine
/
55
a
large
developer,
leading
to
local
opposition
and a loss of
support for
the
citizen
cooperative.
Regulatory
Administrati
ve Backlog:
A surge in
permit
applications
overwhelms
the
Brandenburg
authorities,
delaying the
BImSchG
permit
beyond the
planned
timeline.
governance
rights,
transparency,
and
influence.
Continuous,
open
communicati
on with the
community.
Medium
Medium
Maintain
close
and
constant
communicati
on with the
permitting
authority.
Provide
a
flawless and
complete
application to
minimize
requests for
further
information.
Leverage
political
support
at
the
state
level.
8.3 Actionable Recommendations for Project Optimization and Derisking
56
Based on the comprehensive analysis, the following strategic
recommendations are proposed to further enhance the project's viability
and mitigate its key risks:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Formalize the Hybrid Revenue Strategy: The project's financial
model should be explicitly rebuilt around a hybrid revenue strategy.
Detailed modeling should be undertaken to determine the optimal
split between auction-secured capacity and merchant capacity to
satisfy lenders while maximizing potential returns. This should be a
Day 1 priority following the Final Investment Decision.
Initiate Proactive Stakeholder "Peace Treaty": The engagement
with NABU should be formalized immediately, well before the public
hearing phase of the BImSchG process. The developer should make a
formal, binding offer to: (a) fund an independent, third-party
scientific monitor, approved by NABU, to oversee the installation and
operation of the Red Kite Anti-Collision System for the first five years;
and (b) grant NABU a permanent, non-voting seat on the project's
environmental advisory board. This would be a powerful gesture of
transparency aimed at pre-empting legal challenges.
Establish a Dedicated Commercial Operations Team: To capitalize
on the opportunity presented by ancillary service markets, the JV
should plan for a dedicated commercial operations team or a
partnership with a specialized energy trading firm. This team's
mandate would be to actively manage the project's bidding strategy
across the energy and ancillary service markets on a daily or even
hourly basis, transforming the wind farm from a passive generator
into an active, revenue-optimizing grid asset.
Commission a "Repowering Readiness" Study: The developer
should commission a formal engineering study with Vestas and a civil
works contractor to assess the "repowering readiness" of the site's
infrastructure. The study should quantify the additional upfront
57
investment required in foundations and substation capacity to
facilitate a seamless repowering with a future generation of 8-10 MW
turbines in 25 years. This small additional CAPEX could significantly
increase the project's long-term asset value and attractiveness to
long-term investors.
By implementing these recommendations, the Windpark Prignitz-Heide
can move beyond being merely a viable project to becoming a true
benchmark for the next generation of onshore wind development in
Germany.
58
Works cited
1. Expanding wind energy for Germany | Federal Government - Bundesregierung.de,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/federalgovernment/onshore-wind-energy-act-. Project example in Brandenburg - greenwind, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://www.greenwindgroup.de/info/project-example-in-brandenburg/
3. Community Wind Power - Bundesverband WindEnergie e.V., accessed July 5, 2025,
https://www.wind-energie.de/fileadmin/redaktion/dokumente/dokumenteenglisch/publications/bwe_broschuere_buergerwindparks_engl_10-2012.pdf
4. Germany - Energy Communities - Publications, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://pub.norden.org/nordicenergyresearch2023-03/germany.html
5. (PDF) Success factors of citizen energy cooperatives in north western Germany: a
conceptual and empirical review - ResearchGate, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/-_Success_factors_of_citizen_ener
gy_cooperatives_in_north_western_Germany_a_conceptual_and_empirical_review
6. Citizens' participation in the Energiewende | Clean Energy Wire, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/citizens-participation-energiewende
7. Status of Onshore Wind Energy Development in Germany Year 2022 - Bundesverband
WindEnergie
e.V.,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://www.windenergie.de/fileadmin/redaktion/dokumente/dokumenteenglisch/statistics/Status_of_Onshore_Wind_Energy_Development_in_Germany_Year_2
022.pdf
8. Status of Onshore Wind Energy Development in Germany Year 2023 - Bundesverband
WindEnergie
e.V.,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://www.windenergie.de/fileadmin/redaktion/dokumente/dokumenteenglisch/statistics/Status_of_Onshore_Wind_Energy_Development_in_Germany_Year_2
023.pdf
9. Potential of the energy transition for investors in Germany – Noerr Insight No 2: Onshore
wind, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.noerr.com/en/insights/potential-of-theenergy-transition-for-investors-in-germany-insight-no-2-onshore-wind
10. Germany cuts wind turbine approval times: 14 GW authorised in 2024, but regional gaps
persist, accessed July 5, 2025, https://strategicenergy.eu/germany-wind-turbineapproval-times/
11. JSDEWES: Regional Analysis of Potentials of Flexibility Options in the Electricity System
for the Study Regions Prignitz in Brandenburg and Anhalt-Bitterfeld-Wittenberg in
Saxony-Anhalt
SDEWES
Centre,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid-. Positionspapier Windkraft - NABU Brandenburg, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://brandenburg.nabu.de/umwelt-und-ressourcen/energie/windkraft/20495.html
13. Introduction
Global
Wind
Atlas,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://globalwindatlas.info/about/introduction/
14. Introduction
Global
Wind
Atlas,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://globalwindatlas.info/fr/about/introduction
59
15. V162-6.2 MW™ - Vestas, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.vestas.com/en/energysolutions/onshore-wind-turbines/enventus-platform/v162-6-2-mw
16. Wind energy potential of Germany - arXiv, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://arxiv.org/pdf/-. German onshore wind power – output, business and perspectives | Clean Energy Wire,
accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/german-onshorewind-power-output-business-and-perspectives
18. EnVentus™ Platform - Vestas, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.vestas.com/en/energysolutions/onshore-wind-turbines/enventus-platform
19. Vestas V162-6.0 EnVentus - 6,00 MW - Wind turbine, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://en.wind-turbine-models.com/turbines/2294-vestas-v162-6.0-enventus
20. Vestas wins 115 MW order in Germany for largest order of V172-7.2 MW turbines to date,
accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.vestas.com/en/media/company-news/2025/vestaswins-115-mw-order-in-germany-for-largest-order-o-c-. Status of Onshore Wind Energy Development in Germany First Half of 2024 - Deutsche
WindGuard GmbH, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.windguard.com/half-year2024.html?file=files/cto_layout/img/unternehmen/windenergiestatistik/2024/Status%20
of%20Onshore%20Wind%20Energy%20Development%20in%20Germany_First%20Half
%202024.pdf
22. Protection of red kites - Dimensions Magazin, accessed July 5, 2025, https://dimensionsmagazin.de/en/news/protection-of-red-kites/
23. What is shadow flicker and does it impact me? - Vestas, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://www.vestas.com/en/energy-solutions/development/turnwindshadow
24. Onshore Wind Permitting: Germany - NetZero Pathfinders, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://www.netzeropathfinders.com/best-practices/onshore-wind-permitting-germany
25. Has Germany left behind its onshore wind turmoil? - tamarindo.global, accessed July 5,
2025,
https://tamarindo.global/insight/analysis/has-germany-left-behind-its-onshorewind-turmoil/
26. Wind
power
in
Germany
Wikipedia,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_in_Germany
27. Germany | IEA Wind TCP, accessed July 5, 2025, https://iea-wind.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/12/IEA_Wind_TCP_AR2021_Germany.pdf
28. Wind power expansion in Germany - The South misses its targets : r/de - Reddit,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://www.reddit.com/r/de/comments/1lrbdlh/windkraftausbau_in_deutschland_der_s
%C3%BCden_verfehlt/?tl=en
29. Germany - IEA Wind TCP, accessed July 5, 2025, https://iea-wind.org/about-iea-windtcp/members/germany/
30. New German Federal Planning and Permitting Law Plans - Watson Farley & Williams,
accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.wfw.com/articles/new-german-federal-planningand-permitting-law-plans/
31. German wind power sector in crisis. Energiewende under further threat, accessed July
5, 2025, https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/-/germanwind-power-sector-crisis-energiewende-under-further
32. Germany installed 1.6 GW new onshore wind in the first semester; rigorously implements
EU
permitting
measures
|
WindEurope,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
60
https://windeurope.org/newsroom/news/germany-installed-1-6-gw-new-onshore-windin-the-first-semester-rigorously-implements-eu-permitting-measures/
33. Environment group Nabu opposes expansion of wind energy in forests, accessed July 5,
2025, https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/can-natural-gas-be-green-chinas-e-carplans-worry-carmakers/environment-group-nabu-opposes-expansion-wind-energyforests
34. Energy Outlook: Germany 2025 – Opportunities and challenges in the energy sector,
accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.wfw.com/articles/energy-outlook-germany-2025opportunities-and-challenges-in-the-energy-sector/
35. Demand high and prices fall at German 3.4GW onshore wind tender ..., accessed July 5,
2025, https://www.rechargenews.com/markets-and-finance/demand-high-and-pricesfall-in-german-3-4gw-onshore-wind-tender/-. Press - Results of August onshore wind auction - Bundesnetzagentur, accessed July 5,
2025,
https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/EN/2023/-
_Onshore.html
37. Wind Turbine Cost: How Much? Are They Worth It in 2025? - Weather Guard Lightning
Tech, accessed July 5, 2025, https://weatherguardwind.com/how-much-does-windturbine-cost-worth-it/
38. Investment costs - Wind Energy - The Facts, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.windenergy-the-facts.org/index-43.html
39. Study: Levelized Cost of Electricity- Renewable Energy Technologies, accessed July 5,
2025,
https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/en/documents/publications/studies/EN2
024_ISE_Study_Levelized_Cost_of_Electricity_Renewable_Energy_Technologies.pdf
40. VESTAS V162 5.6MW New For Sale - MWPS World, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://www.mwps.world/market/used-wind-turbines-offered/3mw-5mw-windturbines/vestas-v162-5_6mw-new-for-sale/
41. Photovoltaic Plants with Battery Cheaper than Conventional Power Plants - Fraunhofer
ISE, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/press-media/pressreleases/2024/photovoltaic-plants-with-battery-cheaper-than-conventional-powerplants.html
42. Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG, latest version EEG 2023), accessed July 5, 2025,
https://climate-laws.org/document/renewable-energy-sources-act-eeg-latest-versioneeg-2022_1b40
43. Results of the auctions for onshore wind and solar installations on buildings and noise
barriers
Bundesnetzagentur,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/EN/2024/-_SolarOnshore.html
44. PPA price analysis for German onshore wind reveals big north-south divide - Veyt,
accessed July 5, 2025, https://veyt.com/press-releases/location-location-location-ppaprice-analysis-for-german-onshore-wind-reveals-big-north-south-divide-2/
45. Germany - IEA Wind TCP, accessed July 5, 2025, https://iea-wind.org/wpcontent/uploads/2023/10/Germany_2022.pdf
46. Legal framework for wind onshore permitting in Germany, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://energie-fr-de.eu/fr/manifestations/lecteur/conference-en-ligne-sur-leolien61
terrestre-et-les-procedures-dautorisations.html?file=files/ofaenr/02conferences/2021/211102_Onshore%20Genehmigungsverfahren/Presentations/02_Matt
hias_Laux_BMWi_OFATE_DFBEW.pdf
47. Application preparation process | Clean energy for EU islands - European Union,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://clean-energyislands.ec.europa.eu/countries/germany/legal/permits-and-authorisationprocesses/application-preparation-process
48. Wind Energy: On the Path to the 2% Target - ACE Battery, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://www.acebattery.com/blogs/wind-energy-on-the-path-to-the-2-target
49. Study on barriers to wind launched - MX Underwriting Europe, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://www.mxunderwriting.eu/insights/study-on-barriers-to-wind-launched
50. German environment ministry weighs wind farm distance regulations to protect birds,
accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/german-environmentministry-weighing-wind-farm-distance-regulations-protect-birds
51. (PDF) Red Kites and Wind Farms—Telemetry Data from the Core ..., accessed July 5,
2025,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/-_Red_Kites_and_Wind_FarmsTelemetry_Data_from_the_Core_Breeding_Range
52. NABU Advocates for Expanded Wind Energy Sites Beyond Forest Areas in Berlin,
accessed July 5, 2025, https://themunicheye.com/nabu-wind-energy-expansion-berlin-. Environmental
Assessments
BSH,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://www.bsh.de/EN/TOPICS/Offshore/Environmental_assessments/environmenta_as
sessments_node.html
54. Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) of offshore wind farms - BSH, accessed July 5,
2025,
https://www.bsh.de/EN/TOPICS/Offshore/Environmental_assessments/Biology/biology_n
ode.html
55. Environmental Impact of Wind Farms - MDPI, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://www.mdpi.com/-/11/11/257
56. Assessing the spatial distribution of avian collision risks at wind turbine structures in
Brandenburg,
Germany
ResearchGate,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/-_Assessing_the_spatial_distributio
n_of_avian_collision_risks_at_wind_turbine_structures_in_Brandenburg_Germany
57. New noise emissions rules could bring nocturnal standstill for wind turbines in German
state, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/coal-state-spdpush-national-carbon-price-storage-overrated/new-noise-emissions-rules-couldbring-nocturnal-standstill-wind-turbines-german-state
58. Public participation in wind energy projects located in Germany: Which form of
participation is the key to acceptance? - IDEAS/RePEc, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v112y2017icp63-73.html
59. Energy cooperatives in Germany – an example of successful alternative economies?,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/-_Energy_cooperatives_in_German
y_-_an_example_of_successful_alternative_economies
60. Success factors of civic energy - COBEN, accessed July 5, 2025,
62
https://coben.org/informer/files/COBEN%20%20Success%20factors%20of%20civic%20energy.pdf
61. The
transmission
grid
of
50Hertz,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://www.50hertz.com/en/Grid
62. 50Hertz Transmission GmbH - Grid Expansion, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://energiekueste.eu/projects/50hertz-transmission-gmbh-grid-expansion
63. 50hertz.com > Netz > Netzausbau > Projekte auf See > LanWin3, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://www.50hertz.com/de/Netz/Netzausbau/ProjekteaufSee/LanWin3
64. 50Hertz increases investments in grid infrastructure | 4C Offshore News, accessed July
5, 2025, https://www.4coffshore.com/news/50hertz-increases-investments-in-gridinfrastructure-nid25102.html
65. 50Hertz awards contracts for cables to connect the Baltic Sea wind farm Gennaker to
the transmission grid, accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.windindustry-ingermany.com/windindustry/unternehmensmeldungen/50hertz-awards-contracts-forcables-to-connect-the-baltic-sea-wind-farm-gennaker-to-the-transmission-grid
66. VDE-AR-N 4110 - Infos und Praxisbeispiele (vom Elektroniker) - grimm-schaltanlagen.de,
accessed July 5, 2025, https://grimm-schaltanlagen.de/vde-ar-n-4110/
67. Anlagenzertifizierung – Voraussetzung für den Netzanschluss, accessed July 5, 2025,
https://windenergietage.de/wpcontent/uploads/sites/2/2017/11/26WT0811_F2_1630_Wind_certification_Hickisch.pdf
68. Technische Anschlussregel Mittelspannung (VDE-AR-N 4110), accessed July 5, 2025,
https://www.vde.com/de/fnn/themen/tar/tar-mittelspannung-vde-ar-n-4110
69. Ihr Anlagenzertifikat für Ihre Energie-Erzeugungsanlage - WIND-certification GmbH,
accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.wind-certification.de/anlagenzertifikat/
70. Anwendungshilfe - zum „Zertifizierungspaket“ für Erzeugungsanlagen - BDEW, accessed
July 5, 2025, https://www.bdew.de/media/documents/%C3%B6ffentlich_-_-_BDEW-Anwendungshilfe_Zertifizierungspaket_final.pdf
71. System
control
50Hertz,
accessed
July
5,
2025,
https://www.50hertz.com/en/Grid/Systemcontrol
72. Germany's 50Hertz opens up reactive power market to renewables, battery storage,
accessed July 5, 2025, https://www.ess-news.com/2025/04/03/germanys-50hertzopens-up-reactive-power-market-to-renewables-battery-storage/
63