Sumaya Kazi

SUMAYA KAZI Freelance Content Writer | Editor | English Language Specialist 📍 Remote/ India About Me: I am a Master’s graduate in Psychology with professional experience in customer-facing and content-related roles. I worked with Axis Bank Ltd. (India) from June 2025 to September 2025 in a sales and client coordination role, where I handled customer communication, documentation, and follow-ups. I have also completed an internship at Dr. Samir Gupte Nursing Home, Sangli (Nov 2023 - Feb 2024), where I worked on report documentation, communication with patients, and data handling. Currently, I am transitioning into remote freelance work focused on content review, research assistance, writing support, and data annotation. I have completed multiple online assessments related to writing quality, reasoning, and language proficiency, and I am comfortable working with detailed guidelines and structured tasks. I am seeking short- or long-term remote projects where accuracy, communication, and consistency are valued. CORE SKILLS Content Writing (Articles, Blogs, Educational Content) Editing & Proofreading Grammar, Syntax & Style Accuracy Research & Fact-Based Writing Academic & Informational Writing Content Review & Quality Evaluation SEO Basics (Readability, Structure, Keywords) AI Content Review & Humanization Written Communication (Advanced English) Attention to Detail & Consistency ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY C1 Level - Advanced Proficiency Strong command of grammar, vocabulary, tone, and coherence Experienced in evaluating and improving written English for clarity and accuracy Comfortable with academic, professional, and conversational writing styles RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Content Reviewer / Evaluator (Training & Practice) Remote Experience gained through platform-based assessments and simulated evaluation tasks following standardized rubrics. Reviewed and evaluated written responses for structure, coherence, grammar, and relevance Applied standardized rubrics to assess academic and opinion-based writing Identified language errors, logical gaps, and clarity issues Ensured consistency and fairness in content evaluation Worked with tight deadlines while maintaining quality standards Independent Writing & Editing (Training & Sample-Based Work) Remote | Independent Created clear, structured written content across multiple topics Edited and proofread content for grammar, tone, flow, and readability Conducted background research to ensure accuracy and depth Adapted writing style based on audience and platform requirements Delivered polished content aligned with client briefs and timelines EDUCATION Master of Arts (M.A.) Psychology (Shivaji University) Secured 4th Rank at the university level Strong foundation in research, analysis, and structured writing Master of Arts (M.A.) English (Pursuing) ACADEMIC & EXTRACURRICULAR ACHIEVEMENTS NCC Senior Under Officer (SUO) Awarded Best Cadet Scholarship Represented Kolhapur Group at multiple NCC camps Developed leadership, discipline, communication, and reporting skills WORK STYLE Remote-ready and self-managed Deadline-driven and detail-focused Comfortable with feedback and revisions Ethical, confidential, and quality-conscious Writing & Content Review Sample Topic: Evaluating the Quality and Accuracy of Informational Content In content review and data annotation work, clarity, accuracy, and understanding the context are essential. A strong response should answer the question correctly while avoiding unsupported or misleading details. This sample reflects how I review content with a focus on factual accuracy, relevance, and clear structure. When evaluating informational responses, I first check whether the main question has been addressed directly. Staying aligned with the prompt helps ensure the content remains useful and easy to understand. Adding unnecessary or speculative information, even when it sounds informative, can reduce the overall reliability of the response. Next, I focus on factual accuracy by identifying unsupported claims, exaggerations, or assumptions presented as facts. Content should be based on widely accepted information or clearly stated as opinion when certainty is not possible. This step is especially important in educational and AI-training contexts, where incorrect information can affect future outputs. Finally, I review the organization and readability of the content. Clear structure, logical flow, and a straightforward tone make information easier to process. Writing that balances conciseness with enough explanation tends to be the most effective. Using this approach, I aim to ensure that reviewed or annotated content is accurate, readable, and well-aligned with its intended purpose, whether for AI training, educational use, or general information.