microorganisms
Article
Fervidobacterium pennivorans subsp. keratinolyticus subsp.
nov., a Novel Feather-Degrading Anaerobic Thermophile
Rubén Javier-Lopez 1 , Edoardo Mandolini 1,† , Munavvara Dzhuraeva 1,2 , Khursheda Bobodzhanova 2
and Nils-Kåre Birkeland 1, *
1
2
*
†
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
The Biotechnology Center, Tajik National University, Dushanbe 734025, Tajikistan
Correspondence:- Tel.: -
Current address: Department of Microbiology, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Abstract: Fervidobacterium pennivorans subsp. keratinolyticus subsp. nov. strain T was isolated from a
terrestrial, high-altitude hot spring in Tajikistan. This strain is an obligate anaerobic rod and their
cells occur singly, in pairs, or as short chains under the optimal growth conditions of a temperature
of 65 ◦ C and pH 6.5, with peptone, glucose, and galactose as the preferred substrates. The minimum
generation time of this strain is 150 min. Strain T can efficiently degrade feather keratin at 65–75 ◦ C;
this unusual feature is also exhibited by a few other members of the Fervidobacterium genus. The
total genome size of this bacterial strain is 2,002,515 base pairs, with a C + G content of 39.0%. The
maximum digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) value of 76.9% was observed on comparing
the genome of this strain with that of Fervidobacterium pennivorans type strain DSM9078. This study
describes the physiological and genomic properties of strain T, with an emphasis on its keratinolytic
power and differences from other members of the genus Fervidobacterium.
Keywords: thermophile; keratin degrading; anaerobe; feather degrading
Citation: Javier-Lopez, R.; Mandolini,
E.; Dzhuraeva, M.; Bobodzhanova,
K.; Birkeland, N.-K. Fervidobacterium
pennivorans subsp. keratinolyticus
subsp. nov., a Novel
Feather-Degrading Anaerobic
Thermophile. Microorganisms 2023,
11, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/
microorganisms-
Academic Editor: Juan M. Gonzalez
Received: 25 November 2022
Revised: 9 December 2022
Accepted: 15 December 2022
Published: 21 December 2022
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1. Introduction
The phylum Thermotogae includes extremely thermophilic anaerobic bacteria, with
optimum growth temperatures up to 80 ◦ C [1]. They represent one of the deepest bacterial
phylogenetic branches based on a 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. The physiological
characteristics of the members of this phylum are similar to those of the early microbes,
who were subjected to extreme environmental conditions during the early stages of life on
Earth [2]. All members of Thermotogae are Gram-negative rod-shaped cells surrounded
by a characteristic sheath-like envelope or “toga” [3,4]. These bacteria have a fermentative
metabolism and have been found in a variety of geothermal environments such as oil
reservoirs, hydrothermal vents, and terrestrial hot springs [5]. Since the discovery of
the first species in the genus, Fervidobacterium [6], six more species of this genus have
been isolated from terrestrial hot springs worldwide [7–12]. Representatives of the genus
Fervidobacterium can grow on a range of complex substrates such as cellulose, starch,
or proteinaceous compounds; however, only a few members have been described as
being capable of breaking down keratin, including Fervidobacterium islandicum strain AW1, Fervidobacterium thailandense, and Fervidobacterium pennivorans [9–11]. A total of 287
Thermotogae genome sequences, including metagenome assemblies, are currently publicly
available in the GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/data-hub/taxonomy/
200918/; accessed on 2 August 2022), thereby representing a huge resource of hyper-stable
enzymes with potential biotechnological applications.
Keratin is a structural protein present in feathers, hair, skin, wool, horns, etc. and is
one of the most abundant polymers on Earth after cellulose and chitin [13]. The presence of
a large number of intramolecular cysteine disulfide bonds and inter- and intra-molecular
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms-
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/microorganisms
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22
2 of 13
polar (i.e., hydrogen and ionic bonds) and nonpolar bonds (i.e., hydrophobic interactions)
makes keratin an extremely recalcitrant protein [14,15]. Keratin is insoluble in water and
resistant to weakly acidic or alkaline conditions. It is also resistant to common proteolytic
enzymes such as pepsin and trypsin [16]. Different types of keratins exist in nature, and
they are characterized by their secondary structure and sulfur content [15,17]. According
to their secondary structure, keratins are categorized into alpha and beta keratins. While
alpha keratins are present in the mammalian epidermis (e.g., hair, wool, bristles, etc.), beta
keratins are found in reptile scales and feathers [18,19]. The most abundant amino acids in
feather keratin are serine, cysteine, glutamine, and proline [20]. The high cysteine content
in feather keratin contributes to the abundance of disulfide bonds, which stabilize the main
structure of the feather and impart robustness and resistance to proteolysis and chemical
destruction [19,21]. The main sources of keratin waste are feathers produced during poultry
farming and wool production. It has been estimated that more than 2 million tons of wool
and 20,000 tons of feathers are produced annually worldwide, which raises environmental
concerns [9]. Keratin-laden tissues represent a major challenge in the animal rendering
industry. Two-thirds of animal products are discarded because of undigested keratincontaining compounds. Keratin-laden biowaste is generally hydrolyzed by mechanical or
chemical treatments to obtain feedstock, fertilizers, glues, or foils [9,16]; however, keratin
is only partially degraded by these processes, which are inefficient and expensive. Furthermore, most of the essential amino acids that could be recovered (e.g., serine, cysteine,
and proline) are lost and wasted [22]. The current solution to process the huge amount of
keratin-based biowaste is to bury it in landfills or incinerate it. In this context, the metabolic
versatility of the Fervidobacterium group, their thermophilic features, and the increasing
availability of thermostable proteases for the degradation of proteinaceous biowaste from
agriculture and fisheries have immense potential for biotechnological applications [23,24].
In this study, we describe a new Fervidobacterium pennivorans subspecies recovered from
a hot spring in Tajikistan, which effectively breaks down native chicken feathers under
anaerobic conditions at temperatures up to 75 ◦ C.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sampling and Cultivation
The sample was collected from the Khodja-Obi-Garm geothermal field, located on
the Bank of the Varzob River, 50 km North of Dushanbe, Tajikistan, at 38◦- N,
68◦- E, at an altitude of 1800 m. The temperature and pH of the spring water were
93 ◦ C and 8.5, respectively, with a conductivity of 4378.3 µS/cm [25]. Water samples were
placed in 50 mL tightly sealed anaerobic serum flasks and transported to the laboratory at
ambient temperature.
Anaerobic enrichment cultures were prepared according to a modified Hungate technique [26]. The mineral medium (MMF) used for the enrichment and cultivation was
composed of the following ingredients (per liter): NaCl, 1 g; MgSO4 ·7H2 O, 0.3 g; KCl,
0.3 g; NH4 Cl, 0.5 g; CaCl2 ·2H2 O, 0.1 g; and KH2 PO4 , 0.3 g. A trace element solution (1 mL)
was also added, containing (per liter): HCl (25%), 10 mL; FeCl2 ·4H2 O, 1.5 g; CoCl2 ·6H2 O,
190 mg; MnCl2 ·H2 O, 100 mg; ZnCl2 , 70 mg; Na2 MoO4 ·2H2 O, 36 mg; NiCl2 ·6H2 O, 24 mg;
H3 BO3 , 6 mg; and CuCl2 ·H2 O, 2 mg. Finally, 0.5 mL of resazurin (0.2%) was added to
the medium as a redox indicator. After sterilization at 121 ◦ C for 20 min and cooling to
approximately 60 ◦ C under continuous flushing with nitrogen gas, 10 mL of the vitamin
solution was added, which contained the following ingredients: 4-aminobenzoic acid,
8 mg/L; D(+) biotin, 2 mg/L; nicotinic acid, 20 mg/L; Ca-D(+) pantothenic acid, 10 mg/L;
pyridoxamine·2HCl, 30 mg/L; thiamine dichloride, 20 mg/L; and vitamin B12, 10 mg/L.
Finally, 25% HCl-cysteine (2 mL) was added, and the pH was adjusted to 7.0 with 1 M HCl.
The medium was transferred to 50 or 100 mL serum flasks using the Hungate technique,
closed with butyl rubber stoppers, crimped with metal seals [26], and subsequently supplemented with 0.5% peptone and 0.05% yeast extract. The headspace contained nitrogen gas.
Following inoculation, the cultures were incubated at 65 ◦ C.
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22
3 of 13
To obtain pure cultures, ten-fold serial dilutions for extinction experiments were
carried out, yielding a bacterial isolate termed strain T. A battery of eight flasks filled with
9 mL of MMF medium supplemented with 0.5% peptone and 0.05% yeast extract was
prepared. One mL of the original culture was transferred to one of these new flasks to make
a 10−1 dilution; from this one, a ten-fold dilution series up to 10−9 was prepared. All the
flasks were incubated at 65 ◦ C for 48 h and the process was repeated using inoculum from
the highest dilution that yielded growth. The most diluted growth-yielding culture was
examined by phase contrast microscopy and appeared to be pure, and this was used as a
stock culture for all the following experiments. The strain was stored at 4 ◦ C, and fresh
cultures were prepared by inoculating 1 mL of inoculum from the stock culture into 30 mL
of an anoxic MMF-based medium as described above. The standard incubation temperature
was 65 ◦ C. Additional yeast extract (0.1%) was used for determining the temperature and
pH-dependency and when denser cultures were needed.
2.2. Microscopy
A phase-contrast microscope (Nikon Eclipse E400, Guangzhou, China) equipped with
an oil immersion lens (100×) and a Nikon DS-Fi3 camera was used to observe the bacterial
cells and obtain photomicrographs. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed
at the Molecular Imaging Center (MIC) (https://www.uib.no/ en/rg/mic) (accessed on
11 October 2022) and the Electron Microscopy Laboratory (ELMILab) of the University of
Bergen (https://www.uib.no/en/geo/111662/scanning-electron-microscope) (accessed
on 11 October 2022) using a JEOL JSM-7400F (Tokyo, Japan) and Zeiss Supra 55VP scanning
electron microscope (Oberkochen, Germany), respectively. The samples were fixed in 2.5%
glutaraldehyde (diluted in the culture media) and stored at 4 ◦ C for 24 h until further
processed, as described previously [27].
2.3. Physiological Characterization
The strain was tested for growth under strict anoxic conditions on the following
substrates: sucrose, lactose, arabinose, galactose, mannose, sorbitol, mannitol, starch, CMcellulose, glucose, and peptone using an MMF medium supplemented with 0.05% yeast
extract. After 24 and 48 h of incubation at 65 ◦ C, the growth was determined using phasecontrast microscopy. Doubling of the cell density after 24 or 48 h was scored as positive or
slow growth, respectively. To determine the temperature range and optimal temperature
for growth, the bacterial strain was subjected to 38, 55, 65, 70, 75 and 80 ◦ C and tested in
duplicates using the MMF medium supplemented with peptone (0.5%) and yeast extract
(0.1%). A growth curve was prepared by measuring the optical density of the strain at
600 nm using a UV MIN 1240 Shimadzu spectrophotometer. The cells were grown in batch
cultures in 50 or 100 mL serum flasks containing 30 mL of MMF supplemented with 0.5%
peptone and 0.05% yeast extract. One milliliter aliquots from a freshly inoculated culture
incubated at 65 ◦ C were taken every two hours and centrifuged at 12,000× g for 7 min to get
rid of the resazurin. The supernatant was discarded, and the cell pellet was resuspended
in 1 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing (per liter) Na2 HPO4 (2.5 g), NaCl
(8 g), KCl (0.2 g), and KH2 PO4 (0.2 g) prior to an OD measurement. PBS was used as the
blank. All the measurements were performed in triplicates. The generation time (g) was
calculated from the exponential part of the growth curve using the equation:
g=
ln2
r
where r is the growth rate of the organism, calculated using the equation:
r=
ln(OD2 /OD1 )
t2 − t1
where OD2 and OD1 are the optical densities measured at times t2 and t1 , respectively.
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22
4 of 13
2.4. 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted and purified from cell pellets using the GenEluteTM
Bacterial Genomic DNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primers 27F (50 GAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG) and 1525R (50 -GAAAGGAGGTGATCCAGCC) [28]. The
PCR program recommended for Taq DNA Polymerase (BioLabs, Durham, NC, USA) was
used, and the PCR products were sequenced using Sanger sequencing [29]. The 16S rRNA
gene sequence of strain T was aligned to the 16S rRNA gene sequences of eight members of
the genus Fervidobacterium including the type strains of the six described species using the
ClustalW tool [30]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining [31]
algorithm of the Mega11 software suite [32,33]. The nucleotide sequence distance was
measured using the maximum composite likelihood method [34]. The tree was tested by
bootstrapping using 1000 replicates [35]. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of Thermosipho
africanus was used as the outgroup.
2.5. Genome Sequencing and Phylogenomics
Genomic DNA from strain T was extracted using the GenEluteTM Bacterial Genomic
DNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. The genomic DNA was
sequenced using PacBio technology at Eurofins Genomics, Constance, Baden, Germany
(https://eurofinsgenomics.eu/) (accessed on 11 October 2022). Processing of the reads and
de novo assembly were performed using CLC Genomic Workbench version 21 (QIAGEN
Bioinformatics, Redwood City, CA, USA), which yielded a complete genome sequence of
2,002,515 bases with a coverage of 254×. The genome sequence was submitted to the NCBI
database (accession No. CP050868) and annotated using an automatic NCBI annotation
pipeline. A genome-based phylogenetic analysis was conducted using the Type (Strain)
Genome Server (TYGS) available at the DSMZ website (https://tygs.dsmz.de) (accessed
on 11 October 2022) [36] and the Ortho Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) algorithm [37].
2.6. Keratinase Activity Test
The keratinolytic activity was assessed using native chicken breast feathers as the
keratin-based substrates. The feathers were washed in a methanol: ethanol solution (1:1)
before autoclaving (121 ◦ C, 20 min). Then, 15 ± 5 mg of the feathers was added to 30 mL of
MMF medium supplemented with yeast extract (0.05%), to which a 1 mL inoculum of the
bacterium was added. An uninoculated flask containing only medium with feather was
used as the negative control. The cultures were incubated anaerobically at 70 ◦ C. Every
24 h, the flasks were visually inspected to check for changes in the feather integrity.
3. Results
3.1. Microscopy and Morphology
Following two dilution-to-extinction series in the MMF medium supplemented with
peptone, an apparently pure culture was obtained, and termed strain T, with a cellular
morphology like other members of the Thermotogales: straight to slightly curved cells
(around 1.5 µm × 5 µm) with a membranous sheath-like toga. A spheroid extension of
the toga was observed at the end of the cells and was visible under a phase-contrast and
scanning electron microscope (Figure 1). Strain T-cells occurred mainly as single entities,
although couples or short chains were also common. In addition, some cell aggregates
were observed. Spores were not observed. After reaching a stationary phase, many round
or irregular translucent cells were observed, indicating cell lysis.
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22
5 of 13
Figure 1. Photomicrographs of strain T cells taken by a phase-contrast microscope (left) and a
scanning electron microscope (right). The arrow points to the globular structure of the toga at the
termini of the cells. The bars indicate the size in µm.
3.2. Phylogenetic Identification
A Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain
T showed that it belongs to the genus Fervidobacterium, with a 98.88% sequence identity
to the 16S rRNA gene sequence of Fervidobacterium pennivorans DSM 9078T (CP-).
A phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence was constructed for strain T
and other members of the genus Fervidobacterium (Figure 2). According to the branching
order, F. pennivorans strain T was placed between F. pennivorans type strain (DSM 9078) and
F. pennivorans strain DYC. A maximum-likelihood [38,39] tree confirmed this branching
order (Figure S1).
Figure 2. Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences of members of the genus
Fervidobacterium showing the relationship between strain T (in bold) and other representative strains in
this genus. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of Thermosipho africanus was used as an outgroup. Bootstrap
values as a percentage of 1000 replications are presented at nodes. Bar: 0.01 changes per nucleotide
position. Accession numbers: F. pennivorans T (ON652409), Fervidobacterium pennivorans DSM 9078
(HE-), Fervidobacterium pennivorans DYC (NZ_CP-), Fervidobacterium islandicum H21 (M59176.2), Fervidobacterium islandicum AW-1 (AF-), Fervidobacterium changbaicum CBS-1
(AY-), Fervidobacterium nodosum Rt17-B1 (M59177.1), Fervidobacterium gondwanense DSM 13020
(Z49117.1), Fervidobacterium thailandense FC2004 (JF-), and Thermosipho africanus DSM 24758
(DQ-). All ambiguous positions were removed. There were a total of 1285 positions in the
final dataset.
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22
6 of 13
3.3. Physiology
A low concentration of yeast extract (0.05%) was essential for the growth of strain T.
The strain clearly possessed a heterotrophic metabolism with a preference for carbohydrates
such as lactose, galactose, glucose, and sorbitol, as well as protein-derived substrates such
as peptone (Table 1). It also grew well on CM-cellulose, but slowly on sucrose, mannose, or
starch. No growth was observed when arabinose or mannitol was used as the substrate.
Table 1 shows a physiological comparison of all the described members of the genus
Fervidobacterium. F. pennivorans strain T can degrade native chicken feathers at temperatures
up to 70 ◦ C, a characteristic that is also exhibited by other fervidobacteria, except F. nodosum
and F. gondwanense.
Table 1. Characteristics of strain T and all described Fervidobacterium type strains.
Characteristic
F. pennivorans
subsp.
keratinolyticus
T
F.
pennivorans
DSM9078
F. thailandense
FC2004
F. nodosum
Rt17-B1
F.
islandicum
H21
F.
gondwanense
AB39
F.
changbaicum
CBS-1
Isolation
Source
Tajikistan
Azores
Islands,
Portugal
Thailand
New Zealand
Iceland
Geothermal
artesian basin,
Australia
China
Cell Size
(µm)
0.5 × 2–20
0.5 × 2–20
0.5–0.6 × 1.1–30
0.5–0.55 × 1–2.5
0.6 × 1–4
0.5–0.6 × 4–40
0.5–0.6 × 1–8
Temperature
Range (◦ C)
Optimum
55–75
50–80
60–88
47–80
50–80
>45 to <80
55–90
65
70
78–80
70
65
65–68
75–80
pH Range
Optimum
6.5–7.5
5.5–8.0
6.0–8.5
6.0–8.0
6.0–8.0
6.0–8.0
6.3–8.5
6.5
6.5
7.5–8
7
7.2
7
7.5
NaCl Range
(g/L)
Optimum
0–30
0–40
0–5
<10
<10
0–6
0–10
3
4
0–1.0
≤1 (NR)
2
1
0
150
126
85
105
150
79
99
Generation
Time (min)
Utilization of
Glucose
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Sucrose
slow
+
+
+
+
slow
+
Lactose
+
−
−
+
−
+
+
Arabinose
−
−
−
slow
+
−
−
Galactose
+
+
−
+
+
slow
+
Mannose
slow
+
−
+
+
+
−
Sorbitol
+
slow
−
+
+
−
+
Mannitol
−
slow
−
slow
−
slow
−
Starch
slow
+
+
+
+
+
+
Cellulose
+
−
−
−
+
−
−
Peptone
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Feather
Hydrolysis
+
+
+
−
−
−
−
DNA G + C
Content
(mol%)
39
38.9
45.8
33.7
41
35
31.9
Data from [9]; +: growth after 24 h incubation; −: no growth after 24 h incubation; Slow: growth after 48 h
incubation. Greyed in bold: characteristics determined in this work.
All the tested strain T cultures were capable of growing on peptone and glucose. Strain
T grew within a narrow pH range (6.0 to 7.5 when tested in 0.5 pH increments from pH 5
to 8, with an optimum pH of 6.5). Growth was not observed at NaCl concentrations higher
than 3%, with an optimal salt concentration of 1%. Strain T grew within a temperature
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22
7 of 13
range of 55 to 75 ◦ C, with an optimal temperature of 65 ◦ C. Growth was not observed at
50 or 80 ◦ C.
The growth curve of F. pennivorans strain T was measured under conditions of 65 ◦ C
in MMF supplemented with 0.5% peptone and 0.1% yeast extract (Figure S2). With a fresh
inoculum of cells, the lag phase lasted approximately 2 h. The logarithmic phase spanned
11 h, with an estimated minimal generation time of 150 min. After 13 h, the cultures entered
a long-lasting stationary phase, never exceeding an OD of 0.2. After 24 h of incubation,
the culture flasks did not lose turbidity, and no death phase was observed after a week
of incubation.
3.4. Feather Degradation
Strain T degraded native chicken feathers in the MMF medium supplemented with
0.05% yeast extract. The degradation of the breast feathers was almost complete after
48 h of incubation (Figure 3). For wing feathers, which were more robust, degradation
started after 7 days of incubation under the same conditions, with a complete degradation
within 10 days. Trace amounts of yeast extract were essential for the feather degradation,
indicating that feathers cannot serve as the sole carbon and energy source or that yeast
extract triggers the keratinolytic activity of the strain.
Figure 3. Degradation of native chicken breast feathers by F. pennivorans subsp. keratinolyticus strain
T after 2 days incubation at 70 ◦ C. (A–C) show cultures at times 0, 24, and 48 h, respectively. The left
flask in each panel corresponds to the negative control, containing only mineral medium with feather
but without inoculation. Both flasks were held at the same temperature for the same inoculation time.
An active feather-degrading culture was examined using scanning electron microscopy.
Bacterial cells were found to attach to the keratin fibers (Figure 4), indicating the involvement of cell-bound factors in keratin degradation.
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscope images of strain T grown in the presence of chicken feather.
Images were taken after 36 (left) and 48 h (right) of incubation at 70 ◦ C. Bar = 2 µm.
3.5. Genome Characteristics and Phylogenomics
The genome of F. pennivorans strain T was sequenced using PacBio technology. The
complete genome consists of a 2,002,515 bp chromosome, with an average GC-content of
39.0%. By annotation with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP),
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22
8 of 13
1875 protein-coding sequences were found, 194 of which were assigned to a subsystem
according to the annotation conducted by the RAST server. Additionally, 57 RNA genes
were identified (Table 2).
Table 2. General characteristics of the members of the Fervidobacterium genus *.
Country of
Origin
Year of
Isolation
Genome Size
(bps)
N◦ CDS with
Protein
N◦
F.
pennivorans
T
F.
pennivorans
DSM9078
F.
pennivorans
DYC
F.
islandicum
AW-1
F. thailandense
FC2004
F. nodosum
Rt17-B1
F.
changbaicum
CBS-1
F. gondwanense
13020
Tajikistan
Portugal
(Azores)
New
Zealand
Indonesia
Thailand
New Zealand
China
Australia
2021
1999
2016
2004
2016
1985
2007
1996
2,002,515
2,166,381
2,061,852
2,237,377
2,040,210
1,948,941
2,266,449
2,145,239
1875
1973
1893
2055
1870
1796
2038
1975
RNAs
N◦ rRNAs
(23S-16S-5S)
57
2 Feburary
2002
57
58
56
54
58
57
54
3, 1, 2
2, 2, 2
2, 2, 2
1, 3, 1
2, 2, 2
2, 2, 2
1, 3, 1
% GC
39
38.9
38.9
40.7
45.8
3
40.7
39.7
CRISPR
Clusters
3
4
3
2
8
2
2
1
NCBI
Accession
Number
CP050868
CP-
CP-
CP-
CP-
NZ_CP-
NZ_FRDJ-
NZ_LWAF-
* The data were retrieved from Genbank [9].
Most annotated genes were involved in metabolic functions, such as protein metabolism,
carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid anabolism, and the biosynthesis of cofactors or other
secondary metabolites. Twenty-one genes encoding putative protein-degrading enzymes
belonging to different families of serine (e.g., fervidolysin) and metallopeptidases were
annotated. Enzymes involved in the reduction of disulfide bonds were also identified;
thus, strain T possesses an arsenal of keratin-degrading enzymes. Moreover, this approach
resulted in the identification of known genes predicted to play a role in the resistance to
environmental stresses, such as oxidative stress, cold shock (the CSP family), heat shock,
and detoxification. In this regard, the organism seemed to possess many defense mechanisms against heavy metals (i.e., copper, cobalt, zinc, and cadmium) and general drugs
via a multidrug resistance efflux pump. Two complete 16S rRNA operons were identified
and aligned, showing a 100% sequence identity. Three CRISPR arrays, including 19 genes
encoding CRISPR-associated proteins, were identified. Although motility has not been
reported in fervidobacteria, 56 genes involved in chemotaxis and flagellar motility were
identified. The organism did not contain plasmids.
A pairwise phylogenomic comparison of F. pennivorans strain T against the complete
genomes of the members of the genus Fervidobacterium was performed using in silico DNA–
DNA hybridization (dDDH) analysis using the TYGS server, average nucleotide identity
(ANI) calculation, and phylogenomic tree reconstructions. Based on the TYGS analysis,
strain T was most closely affiliated with F. pennivorans type strain DSM9078, sharing a
dDDH identity value of 76.9% (Figure S3), which was consistent with the results of the 16S
rRNA-based phylogenetic tree (Figure 2). F. pennivorans strain DYC also clustered with
strains T and DSM9078, but with dDDH values < 47%, which is significantly below the
recommended species threshold value of 70%. This indicates that strain T belongs to the
same genome species as that of F. pennivorans DSM9078, whereas strain DYC constitutes
a separate Fervidobacterium species; however, the TYGS analysis indicates that strain T is
sufficiently different from DSM9078 to be placed in a separate subspecies cluster, which is
also supported by certain metabolic differences, for example, the utilization of cellulose
and lactose for growth (Table 2). The other Fervidobacterium members formed distinct and
separate species clusters, with dDDH values less than 21% compared with strain T and
separated by high pseudo-bootstrap values (Figure S3). An Ortho ANI-based phylogenomic
tree and heatmap confirmed the TYGS analysis, showing a clustering of strains T, DSM9078,
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22
9 of 13
and DYC (Figure 5), with an ANI value of 97.42% between the strains T and DSM9078.
Strain DYC shared an ANI value of less than 92% with strains T and DSM9078, supporting
the notion that this strain constitutes a separate genome species. Notably, the F. changbaicum
strain DSM 17883 and F. islandicum AW-1 clustered closely together and shared dDDH and
ANI values of 88.7% and 98.79%, respectively, strongly suggesting that strain AW-1 belongs
to F. changbaicum based on the high overall genome sequence similarity. We proposed the
name F. pennivorans supsp. keratinolyticus subsp. nov. for strain T as it is a particularly
efficient keratin degrader.
Figure 5. Ortho ANI heatmap and tree calculated with the genome sequences of members of the
genus Fervidobacterium. The values represent the percentage overall similarity among the different
genome sequences. The species cut-off was set at 96%.
The genomes of representative strains of Fervidobacterium spp. were also compared
using the BLAST Ring Generator (BRIG) [40], with the genome of strain T as a reference
(Figure 6). In addition, the genome of strain T was used as an input for three different tools:
the CRISPRCasFinder [41] program was run to detect CRISPR/Cas9 clusters, as shown in
Figure 6. Moreover, regions of probable horizontal transfer origin were predicted using
the IslandViewer web server [42]. These predicted genomic islands are also displayed in
Figure 6, which includes, among other features, a zinc metallopeptidase (QIV78721.1) and
nine transposase-related genes. Finally, a region identified as a putative prophage by the
PHASTER pipeline [43,44] can also be seen in the same figure, partially overlapped by one
of the predicted genomic islands.
A full genome alignment of F. pennivorans strain T and type strain DSM 9078 was
performed using Mauve [45] (Figure 7). By annotation with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome
Annotation Pipeline (PGAP), 41 transposases were predicted in DSM 9078 and 21 in strain T.
Figure 6 shows this full genome alignment, with the position of the predicted transposases
indicated by arrows. In addition, three large genomic inversions were detected when
aligning these two genomes, all of which were flanked by transposase-encoding genes.
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22
10 of 13
Figure 6. Blast Ring Generator (BRIG) representation of the comparison of the Fervidobacterium
species’ genomes using strain T as a reference. The innermost circles show strain T’s G + C content
(black) and sections with a GC skew (purple/green). The external circles represent the different
genomes of the members of Fervidobacterium genus, starting with F. pennivorans strain T (pink) and
followed, from inside to outside, by F. pennivorans DSM9078 (pale blue), F. pennivorans DYC (navy
blue), F changbaicum CBS-1 (blue grey), F. islandicum AW-1 (yellow), F. nodosum Rt17-B1 (turquoise),
F. gondwanense (green), and F. thailandense (sky blue). Finally, the most external area of the figure
shows the 16S rRNA genes (black), the predicted genomic islands, CRISPR and Cas9 clusters (red),
and a putative prophage, all found in strain T’s genome.
Figure 7. Full genome alignment of Fervidobacterium pennivorans DSM9078 (species type strain) and
F. pennivorans strain T using Mauve. The upper panel represents the DSM9078 genome and the
bottom one corresponds to strain T. Fragments with the same color belong to homologous regions,
and sequences below the horizontal division correspond to inverted regions. The arrows point to
transposase genes, as predicted by genome annotation.
4. Discussion
The new isolate described in this study belongs to the F. pennivorans species, although
some minor differences between this strain and the species-type strain (DSM9078) could be
identified, suggesting that these two bacteria may be classified as different subspecies. The
strain grew well on substrates such as glucose, peptone, and galactose; however, turbid
cultures were obtained only when yeast extract was added as a supplemental nutrient,
suggesting the need for a mixture of the auxiliary nutrients for growth. This behavior is
not unique to this organism and has also been described for other strains belonging to
the F. pennivorans species [46] as well as for many other strict anaerobes. The first batch
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22
11 of 13
growth curve for a member of the F. pennivorans species was established. It showed a lag
phase dependent on both physical and physiological conditions: an exponential phase
of 11 h with a generation time of 150 min and a long stationary phase. The total genome
size of strain T was 2,002,515 base pairs, similar to those of the other members of the
genus Fervidobacterium, with a similar number of coding gene sequences. Whole-genome
alignment with the type strain showed three large, inverted regions flanked by transposaseencoding genes. Chromosomal rearrangements are not unusual for this group and have
also been reported in other Thermotogales species. Chromosomal rearrangements have
been suggested to affect species evolution [47,48].
The phylogenetic analyses showed that strain T belongs to the same species group as
the type strain (DSM 9078), whereas the DYC strain forms a deeper and separate branch
and shares less than a 92% ANI value with strain T and DSM9078, suggesting that strain
DYC constitutes a separate Fervidobacterium species. However, F. changbaicum CB5-1 and
F. islandicum AW-1 were sufficiently similar to be grouped into the same genome species,
with an ANI value of 98.79% (Figure 4). According to the TYGS and OrthoANI analyses,
strain T should be considered a separate subspecies.
Analysis of the genome of F. pennivorans strain T allowed the identification of several keratinase enzyme candidates. The strain showed strong keratinolytic activity and
could completely degrade chicken feathers after 48 h incubation at 75 ◦ C. Furthermore,
scanning electronic microscope images revealed that this bacterium physically attaches to
the feathers during the degradation process, suggesting that the cell wall or membranebound enzymes participate in the process. Nevertheless, the features required for keratin
degradation are not fully understood, and most research in this field centers on screening
novel microorganisms with keratinolytic activity, as well as their secreted protease arsenal.
Furthermore, for other complex substrates, such as cellulose, it has been suggested that
the degradation of keratin does not occur by the action of a single enzyme but requires a
mixture of different enzymes with hydrolytic activity. F. pennivorans is an anaerobic and
thermophilic bacterium, making it especially convenient for industrial processes, as neither
oxygen supply nor refrigeration systems are required.
Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/
10.3390/microorganisms-/s1: Figure S1 (Phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA gene
inferred by the Maximum Likelihood method), Figure S2 (Growth curve of F. pennivorans subsp.
keratinolyticus strain T in anaerobic MMF medium supplemented with 0.1 % yeast extract and
0.5 % glucose) and Figure S3 (Phylogenomic tree of F. pennivorans subsp. keratinolyticus strain T
and related Fervidobacterium species and strains constructed by using the TYGS genome server
(https://tygs.dsmz.de, accessed on 11 October 2022)).
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, N.-K.B.; field sampling, K.B., M.D. and N.-K.B.; isolation,
R.J.-L.; physiological characterization, R.J.-L. and E.M.; phylogenetic and genome analysis, R.J.L., E.M. and N.-K.B.; electron microscopy, R.J.-L.; data curation, R.J.-L.; writing—original draft
preparation, R.J.-L., E.M. and N.-K.B.; writing—review and editing, N.-K.B.; visualization, R.J.-L.;
supervision, N.-K.B.; funding acquisition, N.-K.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published
version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research was funded by the ERA-NET Cofund on Food Systems and Climate (FOSC)
under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (grant number 862555),
the Research Council of Norway (grant number 328955), and the Norwegian Directorate for Higher
Education and Skills (grant number CPEA-LT-2017/10061).
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: The complete genome sequence is available under GenBank accession
number CP050868.
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22
12 of 13
Acknowledgments: We are grateful to the Molecular Imaging Center (MIC) (https://www.uib.no/
en/rg/mic) (accessed on 11 October 2022) and ELMILAB (https://www.uib.no/en/elmi) (accessed
on 11 October 2022) at the University of Bergen for performing the electron microscopy.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
-.
-.
-.
Frock, A.D.; Notey, J.S.; Kelly, R.M. The genus Thermotoga: Recent developments. Environ. Technol. 2010, 31,-. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Achenbachrichter, L.; Gupta, R.; Stetter, K.O.; Woese, C.R. Were the Original Eubacteria Thermophiles. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1987,
9, 34–39. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bhandari, V.; Gupta, R.S. Molecular signatures for the phylum (class) Thermotogae and a proposal for its division into three orders
(Thermotogales, Kosmotogales ord. nov. and Petrotogales ord. nov.) containing four families (Thermotogaceae, Fervidobacteriaceae
fam. nov., Kosmotogaceae fam. nov. and Petrotogaceae fam. nov.) and a new genus Pseudothermotoga gen. nov. with five new
combinations. Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. G. 2015, 108, 1281. [CrossRef]
Huber, R.; Langworthy, T.A.; Konig, H.; Thomm, M.; Woese, C.R.; Sleytr, U.B.; Stetter, K.O. Thermotoga-maritima Sp-Nov Represents
a New Genus of Unique Extremely Thermophilic Eubacteria Growing up to 90-Degrees-C. Arch. Microbiol. 1986, 144, 324–333.
[CrossRef]
Gupta, R.S.; Bhandari, V. Phylogeny and molecular signatures for the phylum Thermotogae and its subgroups. Anton. Leeuw. Int.
J. G. 2011, 100, 1–34. [CrossRef]
Patel, B.K.C.; Morgan, H.W.; Daniel, R.M. Fervidobacterium nodosum Gen-Nov and Spec-Nov, a New Chemoorganotrophic,
Caldoactive, Anaerobic Bacterium. Arch. Microbiol. 1985, 141, 63–69. [CrossRef]
Andrews, K.T.; Patel, B.K.C. Fervidobacterium gondwanense sp. nov., a new thermophilic anaerobic bacterium isolated from
nonvolcanically heated geothermal waters of the Great Artesian Basin of Australia. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1996, 46, 265–269.
[CrossRef]
Cai, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, D.; Zeng, Y.; Xue, Y.; Ma, Y.; Feng, Y. Fervidobacterium changbaicum sp. nov., a novel thermophilic anaerobic
bacterium isolated from a hot spring of the Changbai Mountains, China. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57,-.
[CrossRef]
Friedrich, A.B.; Antranikian, G. Keratin Degradation by Fervidobacterium pennavorans, a Novel Thermophilic Anaerobic Species of
the Order Thermotogales. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62,-. [CrossRef]
Huber, R.; Woese, C.R.; Langworthy, T.A.; Kristjansson, J.K.; Stetter, K.O. Fervidobacterium-Islandicum sp.-nov., a New Extremely
Thermophilic Eubacterium Belonging to the Thermotogales. Arch. Microbiol. 1990, 154, 105–111. [CrossRef]
Kanoksilapatham, W.; Pasomsup, P.; Keawram, P.; Cuecas, A.; Portillo, M.C.; Gonzalez, J.M. Fervidobacterium thailandense sp. nov.,
an extremely thermophilic bacterium isolated from a hot spring. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66,-. [CrossRef]
Podosokorskaya, O.A.; Merkel, A.Y.; Kolganova, T.V.; Chernyh, N.A.; Miroshnichenko, M.L.; Bonch-Osmolovskaya, E.A.;
Kublanov, I.V. Fervidobacterium riparium sp. nov., a thermophilic anaerobic cellulolytic bacterium isolated from a hot spring. Int. J.
Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011, 61,-. [CrossRef]
Gerday, C.; Glansdorff, N.; American Society for Microbiology. Physiology and Biochemistry of Extremophiles; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; p. xvi. 429p.
Parry, D.A.; Crewther, W.G.; Fraser, R.D.; MacRae, T.P. Structure of alpha-keratin: Structural implication of the amino acid
sequences of the type I and type II chain segments. J. Mol. Biol. 1977, 113, 449–454. [CrossRef]
Shavandi, A.; Silva, T.H.; Bekhit, A.A.; Bekhit, A.E.A. Keratin: Dissolution, extraction and biomedical application. Biomater. Sci.
2017, 5,-. [CrossRef]
Lee, Y.J.; Dhanasingh, I.; Ahn, J.S.; Jin, H.S.; Choi, J.M.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, D.W. Biochemical and structural characterization of a
keratin-degrading M32 carboxypeptidase from Fervidobacterium islandicum AW-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 468,
927–933. [CrossRef]
Lange, L.; Huang, Y.; Busk, P.K. Microbial decomposition of keratin in nature—A new hypothesis of industrial relevance. Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100,-. [CrossRef]
Qiu, J.; Wilkens, C.; Barrett, K.; Meyer, A.S. Microbial enzymes catalyzing keratin degradation: Classification, structure, function.
Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 44, 107607. [CrossRef]
Li, Q. Progress in Microbial Degradation of Feather Waste. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2717. [CrossRef]
Laba, W.; Zarowska, B.; Chorazyk, D.; Pudlo, A.; Piegza, M.; Kancelista, A.; Kopec, W. New keratinolytic bacteria in valorization
of chicken feather waste. AMB Express 2018, 8, 9. [CrossRef]
Tesfaye, T.; Sithole, B.; Ramjugernath, D.; Chunilall, V. Valorisation of chicken feathers: Characterisation of chemical properties.
Waste Manag. 2017, 68, 626–635. [CrossRef]
Williams, C.M.; Lee, C.G.; Garlich, J.D.; Shih, J.C.H. Evaluation of a Bacterial Feather Fermentation Product, Feather-Lysate, as a
Feed Protein. Poultry. Sci. 1991, 70, 85–94. [CrossRef]
Papadopoulos, M.C. Effect of Processing on High-Protein Feedstuffs—A Review. Biol. Waste 1989, 29, 123–138. [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 22
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
-.
43.
-.
13 of 13
Conners, S.B.; Mongodin, E.F.; Johnson, M.R.; Montero, C.I.; Nelson, K.E.; Kelly, R.M. Microbial biochemistry, physiology, and
biotechnology of hyperthermophilic Thermotoga species. Fems. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 30, 872–905. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Miranda-Tello, E.; Fardeau, M.L.; Thomas, P.; Ramirez, F.; Casalot, L.; Cayol, J.L.; Garcia, J.L.; Ollivier, B. Petrotoga mexicana sp
nov., a novel thermophilic, anaerobic and xylanolytic bacterium isolated from an oil-producing well in the Gulf of Mexico. Int. J.
Syst. Evol. Micr. 2004, 54, 169–174. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dzhuraeva, M.M.; Margaryan, A.A. (Eds.) Microbial Diversity of High-Altitude Geothermal Springs in Tajikistan; Springer: Singapore,
2021; Volume 32.
Miller, T.L.; Wolin, M.J. Serum Bottle Modification of Hungate Technique for Cultivating Obligate Anaerobes. Appl. Microbiol.
1974, 27, 985–987. [CrossRef]
Mashzhan, A.; Javier-Lopez, R.; Kistaubayeva, A.; Savitskaya, I.; Birkeland, N.K. Metagenomics and Culture-Based Diversity
Analysis of the Bacterial Community in the Zharkent Geothermal Spring in Kazakhstan. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78,-.
[CrossRef]
Sanger, F.; Nicklen, S.; Coulson, A.R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74,-. [CrossRef]
Sievers, F.; Higgins, D.G. Clustal Omega, accurate alignment of very large numbers of sequences. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1079,
105–116. [CrossRef]
Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4,
406–425. [CrossRef]
Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38,-. [CrossRef]
Stecher, G.; Tamura, K.; Kumar, S. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) for macOS. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37,-. [CrossRef]
Tamura, K.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101,-. [CrossRef]
Felsenstein, J. Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783–791. [CrossRef]
Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Göker, M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat.
Commun. 2019, 10, 2182. [CrossRef]
Lee, I.; Ouk Kim, Y.; Park, S.C.; Chun, J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide
identity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66,-. [CrossRef]
Felsenstein, J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 1981, 17, 368–376.
[CrossRef]
Tamura, K.; Nei, M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans
and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10, 512–526. [CrossRef]
Clark, K.; Karsch-Mizrachi, I.; Lipman, D.J.; Ostell, J.; Sayers, E.W. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D67–D72. [CrossRef]
Alikhan, N.F.; Petty, N.K.; Ben Zakour, N.L.; Beatson, S.A. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): Simple prokaryote genome
comparisons. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 402. [CrossRef]
Couvin, D.; Bernheim, A.; Toffano-Nioche, C.; Touchon, M.; Michalik, J.; Neron, B.; Rocha, E.P.C.; Vergnaud, G.; Gautheret, D.;
Pourcel, C. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates
search for Cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W246–W251. [CrossRef]
Bertelli, C.; Laird, M.R.; Williams, K.P.; Simon Fraser University Research Computing, G.; Lau, B.Y.; Hoad, G.; Winsor, G.L.;
Brinkman, F.S.L. IslandViewer 4: Expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45,
W30–W35. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Arndt, D.; Grant, J.R.; Marcu, A.; Sajed, T.; Pon, A.; Liang, Y.; Wishart, D.S. PHASTER: A better, faster version of the PHAST
phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W16–W21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhou, Y.; Liang, Y.; Lynch, K.H.; Dennis, J.J.; Wishart, D.S. PHAST: A fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39,
W347–W352. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Darling, A.C.; Mau, B.; Blattner, F.R.; Perna, N.T. Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements.
Genome Res. 2004, 14,-. [CrossRef]
DeBoy, R.T.; Mongodin, E.F.; Emerson, J.B.; Nelson, K.E. Chromosome evolution in the Thermotogales: Large-scale inversions
and strain diversification of CRISPR sequences. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188,-. [CrossRef]
Xu, Z.; Puranik, R.; Hu, J.; Xu, H.; Han, D. Complete genome sequence of Thermotoga sp. strain RQ7. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2017, 12,
62. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.