Case Study 2 - A Comprehensive Analysis
Case Study:
Case Study:
Strategy That Gives AYou
Comprehensive Analysis
Gives Unwanted Success
Success
-Hashes Advertising Agency
-Hashes Advertising Agency
Get Aware With What
We Do
• Overview
• Challenges
• Approach
Collaboration
• Results
Strategy Implementation
• Summary
Results
• Conclusion
Overview
Hashes Advertising Agency undertook a project to
analyze and optimize digital campaigns aimed at lead
generation and conversion. The goal was to maximize
return on investment (ROI) by understanding key
performance metrics, identifying improvement areas,
and implementing data-driven strategies to enhance
campaign outcomes. The campaigns varied in
budget, lead costs, and conversion rates, providing a
comprehensive view of the agency's capabilities.
Challenges
Budget Constraints:
Allocatingteam
limited
acrossbudget
Limited
Budget: The marketing
hadbudgets
a constrained
multiple
campaigns
for
advertising
spend.while maintaining high lead generation.
Lead Cost
Diverse
Platforms:
Variation:
Managing
Managing
campaigns
significant
across
variations
multiple in cost
platforms
per
lead across
(Google
campaigns.
Ads, Facebook) was complex and required
meticulous planning.
Conversion Rate Optimization: Improving low conversion
Data Integration: Consolidating data from various sources to
rates in some campaigns to ensure better ROI.
get a comprehensive view of performance was challenging.
Data Consolidation: Handling and interpreting large
ROI Tracking: Accurately measuring Return on Ad Spend
datasets to extract actionable insights.
(ROAS) and other key performance metrics was critical for
decision-making.
Contoso grand
opening event
4
Strategy and
Approach
Collaboration
Initial Planning &
Execution
Results
Campaign A: 5,971 leads at
$17.28 per lead, 4.92%
conversion rate.
Campaign B: 49,968
leads at $9.43 per
lead, 0.85%
conversion rate.
Campaign C: 7,658 leads at
$23.36 per lead, 0.61%
conversion rate.
Campaign E: 10,802 leads at
Total
Sales:
$6.53 per lead,
0.53%
Before:
conversion
rate.$6,659
After: $14,425
Campaign F: 9,187
leads
at $8.80
per
Total
Ad Spend:
lead,
0.94%
Before:
$527
conversion
rate.
After: $3,286
Campaign G: 27,552 leads
Rate:
atConversion
$4.41 per lead,
1.15%
4.12% rate.
conversion
(up 280.31%)
Campaign I: 1,768
at
Grossleads
Sales:
$14.07 per lead,
0.96%
$140,411
conversion rate.
Net Profit:
Before: $5,940
Total Leads:
3,899,201
After:
$10,788
Campaign J: 4,812
ROAS: per
leads at $24.77
lead,-%
conversion rate.
Net Margin:
Before:
74%
Total
Spent:
After: 88%
$73,824.19
Revenue
Growth
Ad Spend
and ROI
Web
Analytics
Session Duration:
Overall
Results - >
19.53%
Campaign D: 7,509 leads at
$6.36 per lead, 5.41%
conversion rate.
Store
Performance
Campaign H: 17,554 leads at
Order
Revenue:
$0.90
per lead, 3.17%
Before:conversion
$17,629 rate.
After: $67,629
Campaign
Orders: A: 5,971 leads at
$17.28
1,213per lead, 4.92%
conversion rate.
Bounce Rate:
Returning Customer:
Total Conversions:
27,296
Total26%
Actions: 18,461 ($4.00
4.63%
(2.47% conversion rate)
per action)
Results
Results
Key Takeaways
Data-Driven
Insight
Cross-Platform
Integration
Collaborative
Effort
Continuous
Improvement
Leveraging data for real-time
adjustments can significantly
enhance campaign
performance.
Managing and integrating
campaigns across multiple
platforms can provide a holistic
view of performance.
Success is often a result of
effective collaboration
between various teams and
external partners.
Regular monitoring, testing,
and optimization are crucial
for maintaining and
improving performance.
Results
Success was driven by
meticulous planning, crossfunctional collaboration,
and a relentless focus on
data-driven decisionmaking.
Conclusion