Topic: Making an Impact: Are Your Philanthropic Efforts Addressing
the Root of the Problem?
Author: Kellie Rastegar
Revision Date: 02/287/2022
Word count: 835
making an impact, philanthropy
Making an Impact: Are Your
Philanthropic Efforts Addressing the
Root of the Problem?
At first glance, it would appear that philanthropy is working. After all,
Pphilanthropic giving has increased year after year since 1977, with
2020 increment eclipsing recordsbeing no exception.
According to the National Philanthropic Trust, in 2020 alone,
Americans collectively donatedprovided $471.44 billion in monetary
donationsphilanthropy, up 5.1% from 2019.
Yet, despite this risingincrease in contributions to promoting human
welfare philanthropic efforts, keyperennial societal problems persists
or, in some cases, keep multiplyinghave too swelled in number.
An unfortunate proof that our decades-long attempt to balance the
welfare scale continues to elude us. Nevertheless, Because theif goal
of philanthropy is meant to bridge the disparity in wellness and
fortunes of those on the low-end of the income scalebracket and the
high-earners making an impact, then we cannot ignore this acute
paradoxical phenomenon is one too acute to be ignored.
But we have to answer certain questions in order to massively
improve the impact of our donations.
This is why iTo this end,n this article asks we raise the question of
whether our current philanthropic efforts are truly solving welfare
challenges the ‘problems’ society faces, or merely sustaining
bankrolling them into perpetuity — as well as and explores providing
a viable pathway to solutions.
The Many Faces of Philanthropy
It can be difficult to Ddetermining the impact ofwhether or not
philanthropy is making an impact is often difficult simply because
there are so many different facets of giving.
Donors and high-net-worth individuals can make monetary
contributions to a particular cause, which is the most popular form of
charityphilanthropic giving.
AlternativelyConversely, they can increase their personal level of
involvement and commitdonate more time and energy to
supportworking hand in hand with local organizations, passing out
meals at a local soup kitchen or bathing dogs at an local animal
shelter.
Another popular form of Pphilanthropy iscan even take place in the
donation of basic resources or relief materials, such as medical
equipment, canned food, clothing, and computers, and the like which
are delivered directly to individuals in need.
Emotional vs. Strategic
EClosely examiningIt’s only when the intent behind giving can
establishphilanthropic efforts is closely examined that it becomes
clear if they philanthropic exterions are in fact addressing the root
cause of the problem or simply papering over the cracks.
In the world of giving, aActs of givingions typically takestem from one
of two dimensionsplaces. The first encompasses is from a place of
compassion and empathy and is, which is often referred to as charity.
This form of generosity usually attempts to provide a prompt but ese
are philanthropic efforts that largely arise to solve the short- term
solution to a crisis and, in return, grantsprovide emotional relief to the
givers. Let us consider this provision of aid in the context For example,
take the problem of homelessness. Charity would entaillook like
offeringproviding food and temporary shelters to people without
housinghomeless populations so that they are able to meet their dayto -day, essential needs.
Philanthropyic efforts, on the other hand, focuses on come from a
place of the strategic, calcuated applicationthinking of financial or
expert resources to solves social issues. , deep study and calculation.
Using the same exampleAlso in the context of homelessness, true
philanthropy requires identifying and addressing the potential
underlying factors of homelessness, such as chronic drug abuse,
inadequate access tolack of mental health resources, or low housing
inventory.
The ultimate goal ofwith philanthropy is to initiate and executecreate
a long- term plan tothat prevents the ‘symptoms’ from replicating
repeating itself.
Unfortunately though, charity often looks and feels better than
consideringtaking a more deliberatestrategic approachfix and
consequently , which is the favorite approach ofwhy it is the path
donors often take. To illustrate, Cclearing a street of homeless tents
and seeing people in a shelter can triggerprovide the warm illusion of
an intervention that worksthat the problem has been solved.
WhereasHowever, it’s only when vulnerablethere is certainty that
individuals remain offin crisis will not return to the streets would good
intentions and deeds be delivering the desired resultsthat
philanthropy can be certain it is making an impact.
Finding the Root Cause
High- net- worth individuals can seeking to maximize the tangible
results and impacteffect of their philanthropic efforts bycan and
should focus on identifying isolate the root causes of the key social
issues they wish’d like to improve.
Better utiilzation of material and immaterial donations To accomplish
this begins with will take deepan extensive study into the institutional
forces, both political and societal, at play that are aggravating
humanitarain crises, from extreme poverty to widespread illiteracy in
certain countriesfeeding the problem.
Also, AaIt will also take a certain level of bravery and courage
advocacy on the part of the individuals or groups is crucial to
reinforcing the correlation between philanthropy and raising good
quality of life. For instance, A key factorsuspect public poilcy is driving
the homelessness crisis in certain parts of the country is directly tied
to public policy. C certain public policies rules and regulations have
made it all but prohibitive to build stymied affordable housing
schemes, and would require a philanthropist looking to address
homelessness may find themselves in the uncomfortable position of
having to take a political stand to address.
Fortunately, giving does not have to demand an individual take a
costly personal positionmake a politcal resolve — which could
compromise their personal or professional wellbeing —
decisionthough, as there is a wealth of information and resources
available that simplify the do make the task of investigating finding
the root cause of social issues much easier. Philanthropists can often
find within the premisescoffers of local universities and institutions of
higher learning, experts eager to work with donors on creating a
lasting impact.
A donor can also coordinate directly with non-profit organizations,
thatwho will have the front of the line data, to better understand the
current situation and explore the best solutions.
Additionally, generous individuals can hire professional consultants to
examine the potentialdesired impact of philanthropic pursuits a
donor is looking to achieve and createinitiateassemble a plans for
their execution its accomplishment.
Once the decision is made isto be philanthropic and not charitable,
the pieces of the puzzle will probablyoften fall into place, that
translatetransforming that vision into reality.
Influencing Outcomes: Investing in the Right Is Key
to Maximizing Philanthropy
Philanthropy remains a critical optionway for high- net- worth
individuals to create an impact in promoteenhance the liivving
conditions ofin their local communitiesy and the in overall society at
large. Through philanthropic donations and charitable endeavors,
donors can empower those underprivileged and underserved in ways
that government and private business can not.
However, to maximize the effectiveness of these resources, we must
direct it is critical thatour philanthropy towardis invested in causes
that will the sources, not the symptoms, ofsolve the root problems of
key social challenges to a quality lifeissues. Only by committing to this
pathdoing so, can philanthropists be certain they’re truly makeing a
genuine difference in the lives of those vulnerable.