Effective Child Discipline: Understanding Behavior and Appropriate Responses
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course Code
Institutional Affiliation
Date of Submission
Effective Child Discipline: Understanding Behavior and Appropriate Responses
Public behavior by children, as in the fast-food restaurant described above, is subject to numerous factors, including stages of development, environmental stimulation, and learned social behavior. Young children around the age of six years old are naturally curious and full of energy and have the tendency to engage in playful activity that seems rambunctious to grown-ups (Charlesworth, 2014). In this case, the excitement of being in the new and stimulating environment with friends might have encouraged the kids to engage in playful and mischievous behavior. Their actions might also have been social learning where they behave by observing and imitating each other, testing boundaries and seeking attention from the caregiver. The woman looking after the kids seemed frazzled, possibly reflecting that there wasn't enough control or that the kids were accustomed to gentler discipline at home.
Jeff's belief that spanking would succeed as the answer likely stems from traditional notions about discipline that pair physical punishment with immediate compliance. Some adults who grew up in households where corporal punishment was prevalent might think that corporal punishment is the effective and necessary means for behavior change (Charlesworth, 2014). However, empirical research has shown that spanking has adverse effects on the child in the long term by elevating the child's level of aggressiveness, inducing emotional distress, and harming parent-child relationships. Spanking might temporarily stop misbehavior, but does not give the child the skills necessary to behave appropriately or help the child learn self-regulation.
A more effective and developmentally appropriate approach for the woman in this instance would involve the application of positive discipline methods such as setting expectations, redirecting the energy of the kids, and rewarding good behavior (Charlesworth, 2014). Instead of threats, she would explain calmly why the behavior is not acceptable and provide an alternative activity that suits. For instance, she would ask them to use the napkins in a creative way without disturbing others or ask for a quiet game while waiting for the meal. Creating structure and direction in a kind yet firm tone would allow the kids to learn self-control without hurting the positive caregiver-kids relationship.
References
Charlesworth, R. (2014). Understanding child development. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.