Global Economy
Private Life
Cover
A BRAVE NEW
WORLD?
10
In late 2007 three friends – a German economist, an American
industrialist and a British businessman – decided to realise their
life’s ambition by going on a year-long around-the-world yacht cruise.
Sometime in November they were shipwrecked on a remote South
Pacific island and only rescued by a passing ship four years later.
By MIKE SIMPSON
A
fter tearful family reunions and celebrations at their
remarkable good fortune, the trio returned to their
desks … to find a world changed beyond imagination
during their time of isolation. For the economist, the
industrialist and the businessman, the paradigms by which they had
lived and worked for the previous three decades had shifted beyond
recognition
Yes, the story is fictional – except for the part about the dramatic
economic changes which occurred during their time away. When
our trio of mythical friends departed on their adventure, they would
have left a world still dominated by the powerful economies and
currencies of the developed nations. But their return would have
revealed a different picture.
They found that while the developed economies, which were once the
engines of global economic development, now stumbled along with
a growth rate of under 2% and had become increasingly indebted,
the emerging markets had become the engines of the new world
order. Indeed, says Adrian Saville, visiting professor at the University
of Pretoria’s Gordon Institute of Business Science and a director at
Johannesburg-based Cannon Asset Managers, it is estimated that
the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and, more recently,
South Africa) will, over the next decade, outpace the Greek economy
40 times over and Italy six times over. Or they’ll eclipse the US entirely.
Buckle up and head South and East
The implications this has for supplanting the once-established
world order are enormous. Saville believes we can expect “more of
the same, at least from the advanced economic world at the heart
of the financial crisis, for perhaps the next four years”. By which time
the likes of Brazil, India and China – if they can continue growing at
upwards of 7% – will have a notable advantage.
It’s an advantage they’re likely to keep. Saville talks of on-going
greying of the population and ‘demographic decay’ in places such
as Japan and Europe. They also carry an extraordinary level of
public debt brought about by governments committing to more
debt than they can service, including implicit public debt brought
about by social contracts to provide state-funded medical care,
unemployment and retirement benefits.
Other nations and regions, once considered peripheral to the
‘old’ established global order, are also making up ground on the
developed economies. Africa, in 2000 famously described by an
Economist magazine article as the ‘hopeless continent’ is now the
third fastest-growing region in the world. According to Saville, subSaharan Africa has shown superior growth to East Asia in eight out
of the past 10 years. “So our hopeless continent is everything but
hopeless. In fact it is putting down a remarkable footprint … Africa
is open for business,” he told delegates at an Economic Outlook for
2012 seminar organised by GIBS.
One of the world’s most influential investors, Dr Mark Mobius of
US-based Franklin Templeton Investments, agrees that emerging
markets are offering better prospects for global investors. “Emerging
countries have progressed from being simply low-cost manufacturing
economies to growth-driven economies with a very strong consumer
base. We believe that, in the next decade, the combined value of
emerging stock markets could exceed the combined value of the
11
Private Life
Cover
Opportunities for emerging businesses
Does this mean greater opportunities for companies in emerging
markets to expand their international footprints – both into fellow
developing economies, as well as the established markets of the socalled first world?
Some companies are already doing this, with notable examples
including Indian automakers Tata and Mahindra; Chinese vehicle
manufacturer Geely; and South Africa’s own Naspers. The latter
has diversified from being a local publishing house to a global
conglomerate which has internet interests in Russia, Switzerland,
Poland, India, Thailand, the Philippines and China (among others);
print media activities in Brazil and China; and pay-TV operations in
many parts of Africa.
If these businesses need inspiration and an affirmation of what’s
achievable in new markets – even before the game-changing global
recession of December 2007 – they need look no further than Korean
electronic giant, Samsung Electronics, and auto brands Hyundai
and Kia. Around 10 to 15 years ago they were regarded as upstart
outsiders by cynical consumers more comfortable with developed
market brands like Philips and Volkswagen.
Today Hyundai is a big-spending sponsor of the Fifa Soccer World
Cup and has a strong global footprint, while Kia increased its new
vehicle sales in the US by a stellar 54% in 2011. Samsung Electronics,
now one of the world’s largest information technology companies,
leads eight out of 10 of the market segments in which it competes
and its Galaxy smartphone has become a global headline-grabber.
“Emerging markets are becoming
hotbeds of innovation, producing
breakthroughs in everything from
telecoms to healthcare.”
SD Shibulal, co-founder of Infosys
US, Japanese and European equity markets,” he said in a recent
presentation.
“Emerging markets will continue their fast growth path, while the
developed economies will grow at a slower pace as they continue
to absorb the costs of the recent excesses in the financial sector,
combined with declines in productivity. Emerging markets also have
a low debt, with an average of 30% to GDP, versus 100% in developed
markets,” said Mobius.
12
Samsung’s chairman, Lee Kun-Hee, has the dubious distinction
of being released from a prison sentence for tax evasion under a
government pardon because he is of ‘strategic importance’ to South
Korea. Certainly, he is a visionary and innovator and has gone on
record as telling his employees: “Over the next 10 years the products
we are leaders in will be obsolete. Do something about it.”
New world order, new mind-set needed
Innovation will be one of the key drivers for emerging market
companies wanting to successfully challenge the developed market
status quo. “Innovation is the key to improving the world. When
innovators work on urgent problems and deliver solutions to people
in need, the results can be magical,” wrote Microsoft founder Bill
Gates in his annual letter from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation,
the largest private charitable trust in the world which was established
by the philanthropic billionaire and his wife in 1994.
SD Shibulal, the billionaire co-founder of Infosys, an Indian-based
consulting and IT services company with offices in over 30 countries,
agrees. “Emerging markets are becoming hotbeds of innovation,
producing breakthroughs in everything from telecoms to healthcare.”
He added: “They are redesigning products to reduce costs; they are
re-designing entire business processes to do things better and faster
than their rivals.”
In a 2011 interview with Insead – a global business school with
campuses in Asia, the Middle East and Europe – Shibulal commented
that innovation from emerging markets is leading to a ‘new world
order’ in innovation and successful enterprises of the future must
carefully leverage the resources and innovation capabilities in these
markets in order to drive growth and profitability.
Does the emerging world lack the killer instinct?
Stephen Wunker, an American business consultant and author,
believes wide-ranging innovation has yet to take hold in emerging
markets. “Many of today’s breathless headlines about innovation in
emerging markets are overblown,” he writes in a September 2011
article in Forbes business magazine. “But not for long.”
As an example of innovation, he cites the launch in India of a
$35 (approximately R280) tablet PC which uses the Android
operating system and offers features like touch screen, USB and
Wi-Fi connectivity. “This product is no iPad killer or even serious
competition for similar devices. However, it has immense potential to
improve access to basic education for over 350-million poor people
in India and millions more in other developing nations.”
While he acknowledges that home-grown innovation is happening in
emerging markets, he argues that it’s still the exception. “It’s a very
rare emerging markets executive who will contend that their country
is remotely as innovative as the US, UK or Japan – even outside of
high-technology, capital-intensive fields. Simply put, it has been
too easy to succeed without undertaking the sort of disruptive
innovation that builds new market space. Banks have grown through
building out their branch networks and product offerings. Retailers
have planted big box stores … In this environment, companies have
prospered through executional excellence.”
Shibulal’s other example is the Tata Nano small car which, with a
price tag of just $2 500 (about R20 000), is claimed to be the world’s
cheapest automobile. He explains that it was ‘reverse-engineered’
by first fixing the price and then working backwards to target the
estimated 65 million Indians who normally ride scooters, mopeds,
motorcycles and bicycles. He believes the Nano has the potential
to create a ‘social revolution’ and points out that an upgraded
version, known as the Nano Europa, is destined for launch in Europe.
“Clearly, innovation that happened in an emerging market is receiving
acceptance on the global platform,” he says.
However, Wunker believes innovation taking place at an infrastructural
level in emerging economies will open up these countries and their
citizens to new products and services. Factors such as easier access
to the internet, cellphone-enabled websites, banking services and
credit will all help to create new markets eager to consume.
But the ones taking advantage won’t necessarily only be companies
URBAN IMPACT: The world in 2025
GDP,-%=$55.5 trillion
GDP growth,-*
100%=$54.9 trillion
16
Small
29
16
4
Midsized
4
Large
3
26
29
34
11
3
73
8
37
70
14
10
Small
13
Large
Midsized
Developed economies
Emerging market megacities
Emerging market middleweight cities
Emerging market small cities & rural areas
McKinsey’s Urban World: Mapping the Economic Power of Cities report predicts that, by 2025, most of the world’s economic
growth will come from the 577 middleweight (population of 10 million or more) cities in the so-called emerging markets. With
populations in these cities expected to grow 1.6 times faster than the rest of the world, some 250 million new households will be
created. China and sub-Saharan Africa in particular are both expected to see their household growth double by 2025. Many of
the city hotspots are in China, but other areas of interest include Brazil’s Fortaleza and Manaus; Sharjah in the Middle East and
Vadodara and Nagpur in India.
* Note: Real Exchange Rate (RER) for 2007 is the market exchange rate. RER for 2025 was predicated from differences in the
per capita GDP growth rates of countries relative to the US.
13
Private Life
Cover
and innovators from emerging economies. India’s Shibulal argues
against the belief that emerging markets are threats to developed
countries. Rather, they present opportunities which can be leveraged
by anyone. “Emerging markets today provide three key opportunities:
new growth markets, talent hubs and innovation hubs,” he says.
South Africa’s Saville agrees that, while some First World national
economies may be in trouble, the same doesn’t necessarily apply
to their companies which are open to doing business globally. “It’s
not so much European companies being in trouble, but European
governments,” he explains. “In many places the companies face
outward – like BMW in Germany.”
Perhaps BMW is an ideal example. While its home European market is
slow, it is happily selling huge numbers of cars and SUVs in emerging
economies – from Beijing to Bloemfontein, Santiago to Singapore.
A business case for corporate culture
Supporting Wunker’s observation regarding a lack of innovation
in emerging markets is the 2011 Global Innovation 1000 study by
international management consultancy, Booz & Co, which indicates
that nine out of 10 of the world’s most innovative companies still
come from developed nations. The exception is Samsung of South
Korea – a country which is classified as ‘emerging’ by some criteria,
but as ‘developed’ by others.
Perhaps, tellingly, the report says that corporate culture – which
can take decades to build and evolve – is critical to the innovation
process. By implication, then, younger companies from emerging
nations could find it difficult to match the innovation of the ‘old
guard’ for years, or perhaps decades, to come.
Even a healthy balance sheet and a willingness to invest heavily in
research and development is no guarantee of achieving innovation
success. “Many companies, notably Apple, consistently underspend
their peers on R&D investments while outperforming them on a
broad range of measures of corporate success – such as revenue
growth, profit growth, margins and total shareholder return,” say the
researchers. “Meanwhile, entire industries – such as pharmaceuticals
– continue to devote relatively large shares of their resources to
innovation, yet end up with much less to show for it than they and
their shareholders might hope for.”
Among the reasons given for poor innovation are a culture of low
risk-taking and a lack of tolerance for failure during the innovation
process. A deficiency in internal structures can also be problematic.
The researchers cite Hewlett-Packard (HP) as an example of a
business which integrates a long history of innovation with new and
more customer-centric demands. “HP has made a conscious effort
to integrate its innovation efforts more tightly with the business, (as
well as) to ensure that both its strategic goals, and the innovation
culture that supports those goals, are aligned with that overall
strategy. And although the company’s overall strategy may change as
14
a result of the recent arrival of Meg Whitman as CEO, the tight link
with the innovation culture is likely to continue,” the report reads.
Geography can also be an advantage, particularly when it brings with
it communities of skilled professionals who share a common culture
of innovation and risk-taking. According to the Booz & Co report,
companies located around Silicon Valley in California – home to what
is sometimes called the ‘West Coast culture of innovation’ – are more
than twice as likely to have suitable corporate cultures and strategies
than businesses located elsewhere.
A study by the Wharton Business School at the University of
Pennsylvania certainly bears this out. Wharton researchers studied
the bankruptcy of the famous Eastman Kodak company and
concluded that part of the problem was an insulated and isolated
“It’s not so much European
companies being in trouble, but
European governments. In many
places the companies face outward
– like BMW in Germany.”
Adrian Saville, visiting professor at the Gordon
Institute of Business Science (GIBS)
culture stemming from its location in Rochester, a town in upper New
York State.
The study states: Kodak failed to build a strategy based on customer
needs because it was afraid to cannibalise its existing business. It
succumbed to inside-out thinking – that is, trying to push forward
with the existing business model instead of focusing on changing
consumer needs. Accustomed to very high film margins, the company
tried to protect its existing cash flow rather than look at what the
market wanted. Long-run strategies work better if you stand in the
shoes of your customers and think how you are going to solve their
problems. Kodak never really embraced that.”
The report continues: “The company’s isolation probably didn’t
help. They had a very insular culture, sitting up there in Rochester.
The company might have been able to innovate more quickly on
the digital front if it had set up a separate lab in Silicon Valley,
then allowed it to grow independently and tap into the area’s tech
culture and expertise. Instead, Kodak got sucked into the Rochester
environment. They recognised the threat, but tried to deal with it on
their own terms.”
This view is also shared by Kodak insiders. Some people in the
company saw a need for change but they couldn’t make it happen,
says John Larish, a photography writer who worked at Kodak from
1969 to 1984 as a senior markets intelligence analyst. He recalls
efforts in the 1980s to drive innovation by setting up smaller spin-off
companies within Kodak, but “it just didn’t work”. Venture companies
in Silicon Valley are “pretty wild”, Larish adds. “In Rochester, people
come to work at 8 and go home at 5.”
Therein lie the lessons for not only emerging markets but their
corporate representatives too.
It is a given that for the foreseeable future, emerging market
economies will continue to grow at a rate far ahead of their developed
market competitors, but the companies located within them may fail
to reap the full benefits of this growth unless they can take dramatic
steps to fast-track their own innovation cultures and processes.
Otherwise, it may be the ‘old guard’ companies which are the real
winners in the ‘brave new world’.
“Many of today’s breathless
headlines about innovation
in emerging markets are
overblown.”
Stephen Wunker, American author and business
consultant
Ernst & Young’s Worldmap Emerging Markets highlights the top 25 ‘rapid-growth markets’ which are increasing in importance both in
terms of their overall weight in the world economy and their global influence. We highlighted a few key players:
Russia
GDP 4%
CPI 5.6%
China
GDP 8.4%
CPI 3.5%
Vietnam
GDP 5.7%
CPI 11%
Ghana
GDP 8.3%
CPI 8.9%
Nigeria
GDP 7%
CPI 12%
Brazil
GDP 3.1%
CPI 5.5%
Chile
GDP 3.8%
CPI 3.1%
Argentina
GDP 3.9%
CPI 11.4%
India
GDP 6.1%
CPI 6%
South Africa
GDP 2.5%
CPI 6.4%
15