Cellular Mechanisms
of Ketamine Addiction
By Kevin Marceau-Laurent
Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD)
• Clinical Practice Guidelines: first-line pharmacological treatment for MDD showed half of patients
don’t respond to treatment (MacQueen et al., 2017)
• 53% and 67% of patients with MDD show non-response and non-remission, respectively, to firstline treatment (Johnston et al., 2018)
• 40%-60% of MDD patients are diagnosed as having Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) (Howland
et al., 2008)
• 2 or more failed trials of antidepressants
• Significantly elevated risk of suicide
Ketamine on Treatment-Resistant Depression
• Ketamine, a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist, showed
promise for TRD patients and confirmed role of glutamate in depression (Berman et al., 2000)
• Single injection of 0.5 mg/kg ketamine can significantly improve depressive symptoms in TRD
patients (Berman et al., 2000; Zarate et al,. 2006, 2012; Vidal et al., 2018)
Berman et al., 2000
Zarate et al., 2006
Repeated Ketamine Exposure
• Repeated infusions have a cumulative and sustained antidepressant effect (Phillips et al. 2019)
Sex as a Biological Variable
• Men and women experience ketamine treatment differently (Freeman et al., 2019)
• Higher prevalence of MDD among women (8.7%) compared to men (5.3%) (NIMH, 2018)
• Women have a higher prevalence of comorbid psychiatric conditions and cycle more rapidly
through the stages of addiction (Johnson et al., 2009)
• Sex differences were present in animal models showing clear alterations in the organization of
sexually dimorphic regions (Becker & Koob, 2016; Scofield et al., 2016)
Ketamine as a Novel Therapeutic
• Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (Abdallah et al., 2019)
• Exerted rapid-acting Antidepressants (RAAD) effects
• Alleviate symptoms
• Substance Use Disorder : Single Infusion + Mindfulness-Based Behavioral Modification (Dakwar et
al., 2019)
• Reduced cocaine dependence and craving
• Promoted longer periods of abstinence
• Alcohol Use Disorder: Single infusion + Motivational Enhancement Therapy (Dakwar et al., 2020)
• Reduced withdrawal length and symptoms
• Promoted longer periods of abstinence
Abuse Potential
• Ketamine is a schedule III drug with potential for abuse and dependence (DEA, 2018; Narendran et al.
2005)
• Higher doses of 1.0 to 2.0 mg/kg KET in humans lead to development of tolerance and
experiencing withdrawal symptoms (Sisti et al., 2014)
• Ketamine has rewarding and addictive-like properties at higher doses in rats (Schoepfer et al., 2017;
Strong et al., 2017)
Abuse Potential – Sex Differences
• Female rats display behavioral sensitization at a lower dose of KET, while males require a higher
dose to produce the same effects (Schoepfer et al., 2017; Strong et al., 2017)
• Male and female rats in proestrus acquired low-dose ketamine self-administration, while females
in diestrus did not (Wright et al., 2017)
• Drug context exerts control over propensity to acquire SA and acquisition to low dose ketamine
suggests reinforcing properties (De Luca and Badiani, 2011; Wright et al., 2019)
Nucleus Accumbens (NAc)
• NAc is a critical mediator of goal-directed
behavior, reward, and reinforcement learning
• dopaminergic input from ventral tegmental
area (VTA)
• glutamatergic input from PFC, Hippocampus,
Amygdala
• Subdivided into Core and Shell
• 90-95 % GABAergic medium spiny neurons
(MSNs)
• Two subpopulations of MSNs:
• D1R containing neurons positively regulate
behavior
• D2R containing neurons negatively regulate
behavior
Scofield et al., 2016
Nucleus Accumbens – KET Mechanism of Action
• Inhibition of NMDA receptors on GABAergic
interneurons leads to depolarization of
glutamatergic projection neurons (Alexandrova et
al., 2017)
• Induced glutamate release in the mPFC which
activates postsynaptic AMPA receptors
(Alexandrova et al., 2017)
Scofield et al., 2016
Nucleus Accumbens (NAc)
• fMRI studies suggest ketamine rebalances
normal connectivity to PFC-related circuits,
such as the limbic system, and the NAc (Chen et
al., 2019; Abdallah et al., 2017a; 2017b)
• Drugs of abuse hijack the natural reward
pathway potentially leading to maladaptive
changes in reward and reinforcing behaviors
Scofield et al., 2016
Operant Intravenous Self-Administration (SA)
• Free choice paradigm that allows the
animal to freely demonstrate their
willingness to work for a reward
• No direct manipulation or interference
from an experimenter or observer.
(Instech Laboratories)
Reinstatement (Relapse)
• It is important to understand how repeated ketamine exposure effects relapse behaviors and
attempt to determine underlying brain areas or circuits involved.
• Cue-induced: environmental cues associated with drug administration such as lights or tones
• Previous work with ketamine and cocaine reinstatement has implicated the NAc and ventral
pallidum (VP) in drug seeking (Wright et al., 2017; Wright et al., 2018; Pardo-Garcia et al., 2019)
Transgenic Rat Lines
• Bacterial artificial chromosome containing rat Drd1a
or Drd2 gene in Long-Evans
• Recombined to replace start codon with iCre cassette
• BAC injected into pronuclei of fertilized Lon-Evans rat
embryos (NIDA, RRRC Transgenic rat project)
• Breeding
• Cre rat + Wt (Long Evans) = Heterozygote pups
• Maintained breeding colony
• Genotyping
• Ear punch: amplify promoter of D1R or D2R and iCre
(RRRC #767, #768)
• Transgene-positive vs -negative rats
Drd1a
Drd2
Animal Model
• BAC transgenic expressing iCre
recombinase under the rat Drd1a/Drd2
promoter
• LE-Tg(Drd1a-iCre)3Ottc
• LE-Tg(Drd2-iCre)1Ottc
• Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated
by Designer Drugs (DREADDs)
• hM4Di: Inhibitory
• Mutated human muscarinic receptors
• Decrease cAMP
• Virus delivered bilaterally into the NAc
hM4D(Gi)
Timeline
Locomotor
Activity
Week 8
Surgery
Ketamine
Recovery
Self-Administration
Week 10
10 d FR1
5-7 d
Jugular catheterization/
Intra-NAc DREADDs
infusion
Extinction
IHC/Imaging 10X/
Cell Counting
10 d
Cue-induced
Reinstatement
Timeline
Locomotor
Activity
Week 8
Surgery
Ketamine
Recovery
Self-Administration
Week 10
10 d FR1
5-7 d
Jugular catheterization/
Intra-NAc DREADDs
infusion
Locomotor
Chamber
Extinction
IHC/Imaging 10X/
Cell Counting
10 d
Cue-induced
Reinstatement
Timeline
Locomotor
Activity
Week 8
Surgery
Ketamine
Recovery
Self-Administration
Week 10
10 d FR1
5-7 d
Jugular catheterization/
Intra-NAc DREADDs infusion
IHC/Imaging 10X/
Cell Counting
10 d
Cue-induced
Reinstatement
hM4D(Gi)
Subcutaneous backport
with vascular access
button
Extinction
Bilateral infusion of
Cre-dependent
DREADDs virus
Timeline
Locomotor
Activity
Week 8
Surgery
Ketamine
Recovery
Self-Administration
Week 10
10 d FR1
5-7 d
Jugular catheterization/
Intra-NAc DREADDs
infusion
Extinction
Operant Chamber
IHC/Imaging 10X/
Cell Counting
10 d
Cue-induced
Reinstatement
Timeline
Locomotor
Activity
Week 8
Surgery
Ketamine
Recovery
Self-Administration
Week 10
10 d FR1
5-7 d
Jugular catheterization/
Intra-NAc DREADDs
infusion
Extinction
IHC/Imaging 10X/
Cell Counting
10 d
Cue-induced
Reinstatement
5% DMSO
Timeline
Locomotor
Activity
Week 8
Surgery
Ketamine
Recovery
Self-Administration
Week 10
10 d FR1
5-7 d
Jugular catheterization/
Intra-NAc DREADDs
infusion
Extinction
IHC/Imaging 10X/
Cell Counting
10 d
Cue-induced
Reinstatement
or
5% DMSO
3 mg/kg CNO
in 5% DMSO
Timeline
Locomotor
Activity
Week 8
Surgery
Ketamine
Recovery
Self-Administration
Week 10
10 d FR1
5-7 d
Jugular catheterization/
Intra-NAc DREADDs
infusion
Double-labelling with
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Extinction
IHC/Imaging 10X/
Cell Counting
10 d
Cue-induced
Reinstatement
or
5% DMSO
3 mg/kg CNO
in 5% DMSO
Acquisition
Extinction
Reinstatement: Drug-seeking
Wild-type
Active
responses
120
Male
Female
**
**
***
***
DMSO
CNO
DMSO
CNO
80
40
0
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
Reinstatement: Drug-seeking
Wild-type
Drd1a-iCre
Male
120
Female
**
**
***
***
DMSO
CNO
DMSO
CNO
80
40
Male
Female
****
**
Active
responses
Active
responses
120
0
DMSO
CNO
DMSO
CNO
80
40
0
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
Reinstatement: Drug-seeking
Wild-type
Drd1a-iCre
Male
120
Female
**
***
***
**
DMSO
CNO
DMSO
CNO
DMSO
40
0
120
Female
CNO
DMSO
CNO
80
40
0
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
Male
Female
*
*
**
*
DMSO
CNO
DMSO
CNO
****
Active
responses
80
Drd2-iCre
Male
**
Active
responses
Active
responses
120
80
40
0
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
EXT
D10
Reinstate
Cellular Mechanisms of Ketamine Addiction
Rationale
• The hM4 virus is designed to inhibit cell activation so this needs to be confirmed to validate
behavior + chemogenetic technique
Aims
• We are validating our previous work with KET/SAL and NAc Core/Shell cFos expression
• We are going to confirm chemogenetic inhibition of D1- and D2-MSNs with CNO
Hypotheses
• We will see higher cFos expression in ketamine compared to saline rats
• We will see higher cFos expression in NAc Core compared to the Shell
• We will see an overall reduction of cFos in both D1- and D2-MSNs
• We will see a greater reduction of cFos in viral transfected Drd1a transgenic rat neurons
Methods
Locomotor
Activity
Week 8
Surgery
Ketamine
Recovery
Self-Administration
Week 10
10 d FR1
5-7 d
Jugular catheterization/
Intra-NAc DREADDs
infusion
Extinction
IHC/Imaging 10X/
Cell Counting
10 d
Cue-induced
Reinstatement
• cFos is a transcription factor and early marker of neuronal activation (Nestler, 2001)
• Cre-dependent hM4Di virus only expresses mCherry in transfected cells
cFos Expression
• IHC: 10X Stiched-image of entire NAc in wild-type rat
cFos and mCherry Expression
• 10X Stitched-image
of entire NAc in
Drd1a and Drd2
transgenic rats
• Double-IHC for cFos
and mCherry + DAPI
cFos and mCherry Expression
• 10X Stitched-image
of entire NAc in
Drd1a and Drd2
transgenic rats
• Double-IHC for cFos
and mCherry + DAPI
Summary
• Total cFos (Core + Shell) is higher in rats that self-administer KET compared with SAL
• Total cFos (KET + SAL) is higher in the NAc Core compared with the Shell
• A reduction of cFos was observed in both D1R- and D2R-MSNs treated with CNO when compared
with DMSO controls, validating our chemogenetic technique.
• Between subtypes, a significant reduction in cFos was present in D1R-MSN’s compared to D2RMSN’s
• No difference in cFos expression between genotypes and mCherry expressions suggest the hM4Di
viral construct doesn’t interfere with neuronal activity.
Conclusion
• Higher cFos expression in NAc Core of KET and SAL rats suggests this subregion mediates
sensitivity to cues.
• Total cFos (Core + Shell) is higher in rats that self-administer KET compared with SAL, suggesting
that KET’s rewarding/reinforcing properties induce reinstatement to cues.
• While CNO does lead to chemogenetic inhibition of both MSN subtypes, the additional reduction
of cFos in Drd1a neurons coupled with the behavioral findings suggests D1R-MSNs mediate drugseeking during cue-induced reinstatement
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank the following people who have given me the chance to work on this thesis and to
those who have helped me along this process, increasing my knowledge and skills in the lab:
Devin Hagarty
Alfonso Brea Guerrero
Sarah Dollie Jennings
Mia Trupiano (rotation)
Michelle Crawford
Dr. Florian Duclot
Dr. Samantha Saland
HITM Committee:
Dr. Mohamed Kabbaj
Dr. Lisa Eckel
Dr. Yi Zhou
Undergraduate Research Assistants:
Olivia Csernecky
Katherine Martinez
Ty Lombard
Kaynas Phillips
Funding: Dept of Biomedical Sciences
NIDA: R01-DA043461
Questions?