THE ROLE OF E-PAYMENT IN REVENUE COLLECTION IN UGANDA;
A Case of Umeme, Nakulabye Branch.
BY
MAY, 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................... ii
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................... vi
LIST OF ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................... vii
ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................ viii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1
1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background to the Study .................................................................................................. 1
1.1.1 Historical background................................................................................................ 1
1.1.2 Theoretical background ............................................................................................. 1
1.1.3 Conceptual background ............................................................................................. 2
1.1.4 Contextual background .............................................................................................. 3
1.2 Statement of the Problem ................................................................................................. 3
1.3 Purpose of the study ......................................................................................................... 4
1.4 Objectives of the study..................................................................................................... 4
1.5 Research questions ........................................................................................................... 4
1.6 Hypothesis........................................................................................................................ 4
1.7 Scope of the study ............................................................................................................ 4
1.7.1 Geographical scope.................................................................................................... 4
1.7.2 Subject scope ............................................................................................................. 4
1.7.3 Time scope ................................................................................................................. 5
1.8 Significance of the study .................................................................................................. 5
1.9 Operational definition of key terms ................................................................................. 5
1.10 Conceptual Framework .................................................................................................. 7
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................ 8
2.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 8
2.1 E-payment in Uganda ...................................................................................................... 8
2.1.1 Mobile Money ........................................................................................................... 9
2.1.2 PayWay ...................................................................................................................... 9
2.1.4 E-funds transfer ....................................................................................................... 10
2.2 Revenue collection ......................................................................................................... 11
ii
2.2.1 Prepaid fees (Yaka) ................................................................................................. 12
2.2.2 Postpaid bills............................................................................................................ 13
2.2.3 Connection/Reconnection fees ................................................................................ 14
2.3 E-payment charges ......................................................................................................... 15
2.4 E-payment and revenue collection ................................................................................. 15
2.4.1 The effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection ................................................ 16
2.4.2 The effect of PayWay on revenue collection........................................................... 18
2.4.3 The effect of E-Funds Transfer on revenue collection ............................................ 19
2.5 Summary of literature review ........................................................................................ 21
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 22
3.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 22
3.1 Research design ............................................................................................................. 22
3.2 Study Population ............................................................................................................ 22
3.3 Sample size, design and procedure ................................................................................ 22
3.3.1 Sample size .............................................................................................................. 22
3.3.2 Sampling procedure ................................................................................................. 23
3.3.3 Sampling design ...................................................................................................... 23
3.4 Data sources ................................................................................................................... 23
3.5 Data collection methods and Instruments ...................................................................... 23
3.5.1 Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 23
3.5.2 Documentary review................................................................................................ 23
3.6 Data collection instruments............................................................................................ 24
3.6.1 Questionnaires ......................................................................................................... 24
3.7 Data quality control........................................................................................................ 24
3.7.1 Validity .................................................................................................................... 24
3.7.2 Reliability ................................................................................................................ 24
3.8 Data processing and analysis ......................................................................................... 24
3.8.1 Data processing........................................................................................................ 24
3.8.2 Data analysis ............................................................................................................ 24
3.9 Measurement of variables .............................................................................................. 25
iii
3.10 Research Procedure ...................................................................................................... 25
3.11 Ethical consideration .................................................................................................... 25
3.12 Limitations and solutions ............................................................................................. 25
CHAPTER
FOUR:
PRESENTATION
OF
FINDINGS,
ANALYSIS
AND
INTERPRETATION................................................................................................................ 26
4.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 26
4.1 General information about the respondents ................................................................... 26
4.1.1 Gender of respondents ............................................................................................. 26
4.1.2 Age of the respondents ............................................................................................ 27
4.1.3 Level of education of the respondents ..................................................................... 27
4.1.4 Departments of work of the respondents ................................................................. 28
4.1.5 Tenure of service in the organization ...................................................................... 28
4.2 Electronic Payment (Independent Variable) .................................................................. 29
4.2.1 The influence of Mobile Money on revenue collection .......................................... 29
4.3.2 Regression test........................................................................................................ 34
The beta value of 0.386 reveals that mobile money explained 38.6% of the variance in the
dependent variable (revenue collection of Umeme), the remaining 61.4% is explained by
other strategies. The regression coefficient r =.007 was significant implying that if Umeme
wants to improve its revenue collection, then, it can manipulate mobile money as a strategy
to realize its objective. ...................................................................................................... 35
4.2.2 The effect of PayWay on revenue collection........................................................... 35
4.3.2 Regression test........................................................................................................ 39
4.2.3 The effect of Electronic Funds Transfer on revenue collection .............................. 41
4.3.2 Regression test ......................................................................................................... 46
The beta value of 0.786 reveals that Electronic Funds Transfer explained 78.6% of the
variance in the dependent variable (revenue collection at Umeme Nakulabye branch), the
remaining 39.4% is explained by other strategies. The regression coefficient r =.000 was
significant implying that if Umeme wants to improve its revenue collection, then, it can
manipulate Electronic Funds Transfer as a strategy to realize its objective. ....................... 47
4.3 Revenue collection (Dependent Variable) ..................................................................... 47
4.3.1 Prepaid fees ..................................................................................................................... 47
iv
4.3.2 Postpaid bills............................................................................................................ 50
4.3.3 Connection/Reconnection fees ................................................................................ 52
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............ 54
5.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 54
5.1 Summary of the study findings ...................................................................................... 54
5.1.1 The effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection ................................................ 54
Standardized Coefficients Beta is equal to 0.386 (table 11) implying that mobile money
explained 38.6% of the variance in revenue collection at Umeme. The remaining 61.4% is
explained by other strategies. The regression coefficient r =.007 was significant implying
that Umeme can manipulate mobile money as a strategy to improve its revenue collection.
.......................................................................................................................................... 55
5.1.2 The effect of PayWay on revenue collection........................................................... 55
5.1.3 The effect of Electronic Funds Transfer on revenue collection .............................. 56
5.2 Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 56
5.2.1 The effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection ................................................ 56
5.2.2 The effect of PayWay on revenue collection........................................................... 57
5.2.3 The effect of Electronic Funds Transfer on revenue collection .............................. 57
5.3 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 57
The study makes the following recommendations: ................................................................. 57
5.4 Areas for further research .................................................................................................. 58
REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 59
QUESTIONNAIRE ................................................................................................................. 63
v
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Distribution of Sample Size ....................................................................................... 22
Table 2: Findings on the gender of the respondents ................................................................ 26
Table 3: Findings on the age of the respondents...................................................................... 27
Table 4: Findings on the level of education of the respondents .............................................. 27
Table 5: Findings on the departments of work ........................................................................ 28
Table 6: Findings on the tenure of service of the respondents in the organization ................. 29
Table 7: Descriptive Statistics for the effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection ........... 30
Table 8: Showing Pearson correlation between Mobile Money and revenue collection ......... 33
Table 9: Showing model summary for Mobile Money and revenue collection ...................... 34
Table 10: Showing ANOVA values for Mobile Money and revenue collection ..................... 34
Table 11: Regression coefficients for Mobile Money and revenue collection ........................ 35
Table 12: Descriptive Statistics for the effect of PayWay on revenue collection .................. 36
Table 13: Showing Pearson correlation between PayWay and revenue collection ................ 39
Table 14: Showing model summary for PayWay and revenue collection .............................. 40
Table 15: Showing ANOVA values for PayWay and revenue collection ............................... 40
Table 16: Regression coefficients for PayWay and revenue collection ................................. 40
Table 17: Descriptive Statistics for the effect of E-Funds Transfer and revenue collection ... 42
Table 18: Showing Pearson correlation between E-Funds Transfer and revenue collection .. 45
Table 19: Showing model summary for E-Funds Transfer and revenue collection ................ 46
Table 20: Showing ANOVA values for E-Funds Transfer and revenue collection ................ 46
Table 21: Regression coefficients for E-Funds Transfer and revenue collection .................... 47
Table 22: Descriptive Statistics for prepaid fees ..................................................................... 48
Table 23: Descriptive Statistics for Postpaid bills ................................................................... 50
Table 24: Descriptive Statistics for connection/reconnection fees .......................................... 52
vi
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ACH
Automated Clearing House
ATMs
Automated Teller Machines
B2B
Business to Business
B2G
Business to Governments
BOU
Bank of Uganda
DSTV
Dish Satellite Television
EDI
Electronic Data Interchange
EFT
Electronic Funds Transfer
ERA
Electricity Regulatory Authority
G2B
Governments to Business
G2P
Governments to Person
ICT
Information Communication Technology
KCCA
Kampala Capital City Authority
COVID-19
Coronavirus Desease 2019
kWh
Kilo Watt Hour
MMI
Mobile Money International
MMSPs
Mobile Money Service Providers
MTN
Mobile Telecommunication Network
NGOs
Non-Governmental Organizations
NITA
National Information Technology Authority
NSDS
National Service Delivery Survey
P2B
Person to Business
P2G
Person to Governments
PoS
Point of Sale
SFI
Supervised Financial Institution
TAM
Technology Acceptance Model
TV
Television
UGX
Uganda Shillings
URA
Uganda Revenue Authority
vii
ABSTRACT
The main objective of the study was to determine the effect of electronic payment on revenue
collection in Uganda, focusing on Umeme Nakulabye branch. The study specifically focused
on; the effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection, the effect of PayWay on revenue
collection, and the effect of Electronic Funds Transfer on revenue collection. The study
employed a cross-sectional research design with a quantitative approach. Questionnaires were
used to collect data from the target sample. The target sample was determined using the table
which was developed by Krejcie & Morgan, (1970) for determining the sample of a given
population. Both primary and secondary data sources were used in the study. Data was analysed
using SPSS version 25 and presented in form of tables showing frequencies, percentages,
means, standard deviations, correlations, and regressions. The study findings show that; Mobile
Money alone contributes only 13.0% to revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. The
remaining 87.0% of revenue collection is influenced by other strategies, PayWay alone
contributes only 26.8% to revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. The remaining
73.2% of revenue collection is influenced by other strategies, Electronic Funds Transfer alone
contributes 60.6% to revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. The remaining 39.4%
of revenue collection is influenced by other strategies. The study concludes that; the use of
Mobile Money influences revenue collection by a magnitude of 38.6%, the use of PayWay
influences revenue collection by 53.3%, and the use of Electronic Funds Transfer influences
revenue collection by 78.4% at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. The study recommends that; the
physical collection of money from customers by some officers from Umeme should be
tightened to ensure that all departments adopt e-payments systems. There should be clear
regulations and policies governing the adoption of e-payments systems. The organization
should increase its public awareness campaigns to ensure that the consumers get the right
information about e-payment revenue collection, It was very difficult to obtain study data due
to the COVID-19 lockdown, the reluctance and uncooperativeness of the respondents, who felt
that they were being disturbed and would even fail to explain some technical terms. It is
suggested that, another study should be conducted on the same variables by another researcher
to avoid the limitation of limited information.
viii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.0 Introduction
This section presents the background to the study, problem statement, Purpose of the study,
objectives, research questions, hypothesis, significance of the study, scope of the study,
definition of key terms, and the conceptual framework.
1.1 Background to the Study
1.1.1 Historical background
The electronification of payment services started in the 1980s and has reached a medium level
of maturity in many African countries (Miva, 2011). The first stage of innovation, process
innovation, changed the way interbank payments are processed but went almost unnoticed by
the public. Further stages of innovation were more visible, since they affected the way that
customers interacted with their banks. Most notable was the product innovation of electronic
banking, e.g. ATMs, card payments, and remote banking facilities. The banking industry was
the main driving force behind these developments, which were primarily aimed at cost-saving
and gains in efficiency (Dave, 2011).
Currently the electronification of payments is approaching another stage, which can be largely
grouped around new business opportunities in electronic commerce that have arisen from the
use of the internet. High-speed networks for fixed-line and wireless data transmission and
communication allow new means of interaction between consumers and merchants (Baike,
2017). Many aspects of commerce have changed, including the availability of products and
services and the way that customers search, order, and pay for them. Equally, they facilitate a
larger variety of remote interactions with banks. This development can lead to greater
efficiency and convenience, especially if purchasing, invoicing and payment solutions are
interoperable or integrated in ways that allow straight-through processing of transaction data.
Besides, the telecommunications industry and near-banks are now offering payment-related
services (Yolo, 2015).
1.1.2 Theoretical background
One of the theories to explain E-payment is the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). User
acceptance of new information technology has been extensively studied in the context of
information systems management. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), introduced by
Davis (1989), has gained much popularity for predicting information systems acceptance.
1
Technology Acceptance Model serves to explain and predict information technology
acceptance and diagnose problems before users experience the technology. Following the
Technology Acceptance Model, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are thought to
be able to predict user behavior that leads to user acceptance of the technology.
Perceived usefulness, defined by Davis, et al. (1989), is the user’s subjective opinion that using
a system will increase the user’s job performance within an organizational context. Perceived
ease of use refers to users’ expectations that software use will be free of effort. Perceived ease
of use has a direct impact on perceived usefulness, but not vice versa. In their work on
validating Technology Acceptance Model, Davis et al. (1989) have discovered stronger
relationships between perceived usefulness and behavioral intentions to use, than between
perceived ease of use and behavioral intentions. Technology Acceptance Model is a theoretic
model based on extensive empirical evidence. In the work of Davis (1989) a validated scale for
measuring user acceptance along the two model’s constructs was presented and substantiated
with sufficient empirical evidence.
1.1.3 Conceptual background
Revenue collection is very important for every business in the world as it enables the business
to acquire assets which are not liable to debt and which the business uses to develop its
economy (Ngotho & Kerongo, 2014). More importantly, high revenue collection performance
is vital to promote efficiency in service delivery and economic development. However, studies
and other journal publications have shown that most businesses face serious challenges in their
revenue collection performance (Balunywa, 2014), where businesses are not able to collect
sufficient funds to cover their budget expectations. For years, revenue collectors have not been
channeling all the amount of money they collect to the business Treasury (Ngotho & Kerongo,
2014).
For instance, Umeme’s revenue collection staff would collude with the revenue payers to avoid
paying the prescribed charges and instead bribe the collector to shield against paying the correct
amount to Umeme Uganda. The net effect was a bigger loss, which deterred Umeme’s
economic development and improved service delivery (Namoit, 2012). To eliminate or
significantly reduce corruption and achieve Umeme’s financial objective and simplify
payments, Electronic Payment (E-payment) was introduced (Njanja, 2014). The world has
2
witnessed an upsurge of Electronic Payment systems meant to facilitate the elimination of
losses of revenue through corruption and simplify payments (Abor, 2004).
1.1.4 Contextual background
Revenue collection in the developing economies like Uganda has not always been as effective
as it should be. They face various challenges in their revenue collection performance, where
Parastatals are not able to collect sufficient funds to cover their budget expectations and thereby
causing huge local revenue collection gaps (Onyango, 2013). E-payment was introduced by
Umeme Uganda to increase revenue collection, reduce costs of bills payment, and improve
bills payment compliance. The introduction of electronic bills payment systems was intended
to reduce costs of handling, processing, and storing paperwork. However, bills payment
compliance levels remain low and revenue collection is below the targets set by Umeme
Uganda (UMEME Integrated Annual Report, 2016).
The performance of revenue collection at Umeme Uganda is deteriorated by corrupt practices
issues which result in tax evasion through corruption by corrupt revenue collection officers
(Balunywa, 2014). Completely avoiding tax evasion would ensure total revenue collection
performance (high revenue collection compliance). Elimination of corruption would ensure
that the Parastatal collects all the projected revenue and thereby increasing the revenue
collection performance.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Electronic payment also dubbed “TouchPay” was introduced by Umeme Uganda to increase
revenue collection, administration, avail services to the electricity consumers all the time from
anywhere. It also aimed at reducing the costs of bills payment and improve bills payment
compliance. The introduction of electronic bills payment systems was intended to benefit both
Umeme Uganda and electricity consumers. For Umeme Uganda, electronic payment lightens
the workload and reduces operational costs –such as the costs of handling, processing, and
storing paperwork. However, bills payment compliance levels remain low and revenue
collection is below the targets set by Umeme (Umeme Integrated Report and Financial
Statements, 2018). The Parastatal still registers power and financial losses resulting from illegal
power connections despite the need to increase revenue collection and enforcement to provide
better services. The researcher was therefore motivated by the above background to conduct a
study on the role of electronic payment on revenue collection at Umeme Nakulabye branch.
3
1.3 Purpose of the study
The main purpose of the study was to examine the role of E-payment in revenue collection in
Uganda, taking Umeme, Nakulabye branch as the case study.
1.4 Objectives of the study
The study was guided by the following objectives:
i.
To determine the effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection.
ii.
To examine the effect of PayWay on revenue collection.
iii.
To determine the effect of E-Funds Transfer on revenue collection.
1.5 Research questions
The study sought to answer the following questions:
i.
What is the effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection?
ii.
What is the effect of PayWay on revenue collection?
iii.
What is the effect of E-Funds Transfer on revenue collection?
1.6 Hypothesis
The study assumed that:
H1:
Mobile Money affects revenue collection.
H0:
Mobile Money does not affect revenue collection.
H1:
PayWay affects revenue collection.
H0:
PayWay does not affect revenue collection.
H1:
E-Funds Transfer affects revenue collection.
H0:
E-Funds Transfer does not affect revenue collection.
1.7 Scope of the study
1.7.1 Geographical scope
The study was carried out at Umeme, Nakulabye branch, Plot 419 Kibuga, Mengo. This is
because the researcher expected to get all the needed information from this branch, to fully
complete the research.
1.7.2 Subject scope
The study has two variables; the independent and dependent variables. The independent
variable is E-payment and it involves; Mobile Money, PayWay, and E-Funds Transfer whereas
4
the dependent variable is the revenue collected by Umeme and it involves; Prepaid (Yaka) fees,
postpaid bills, Connection/Reconnection fees and assessment fees.
1.7.3 Time scope
The study covered three years, from- because it is the period when Umeme
customers started extensive use of Electronic Payment.
1.8 Significance of the study
The study may be significant to the different stakeholders in the following ways;
Government: The study findings and recommendations may be beneficial to other government
parastatals by providing information on how to ensure effective e-payment that would enrich
the revenue collection process hence achieve the objectives of the parastatals and propel socioeconomic development through effective revenue collection.
Umeme and Similar Organizations: The study may help Umeme Uganda and similar
organizations to acquire information on how to ensure effective e-payment that may enrich the
revenue collection system and enable them to achieve the set goals and objectives.
Scholars: The findings from the study may contribute to the body of scholarly knowledge in
e-payments as a tool for optimal revenue collection. The study is a window opener for more
research in the area of effective e-payment systems that would enhance high revenue collection
performance, making it useful to researchers.
Public: The study may help the public to understand the benefits of using electronic payment
in contrast to the traditional over the counter payment system.
1.9 Operational definition of key terms
E-payment: An electronic payment (e-payment), is paying for goods or services on the
internet. It includes all financial operations using electronic devices, such as computers,
smartphones, or tablets.
Mobile Money: This refers to the use of mobile phones to transfer funds between banks or
accounts, deposit or withdraw funds, or pay bills.
5
E-Funds Transfer: Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) is the electronic transfer of money from
one bank account to another, either within a single financial institution or across multiple
institutions, via computer-based systems, without the direct intervention of bank staff.
Revenue: Revenue is the income that a business gets from its normal business activities,
usually from the sale of goods and services to customers.
6
1.10 Conceptual Framework
Independent Variable
Dependent Variable
Revenue Collection
E-Payment
Variable
• Mobile Money
•
Prepaid fees (Yaka)
• PayWay
•
Postpaid bills
• E-Funds Transfer
•
Connection/Reconnection
fees
Intervening Variable
• E-payment charges
• Politics
• ERA Policies
Source: Dave Chaffey, (2011). E-business
& E-commerce management-strategy,
implementation, and Practice.
From the figure above, e-payment (independent variable) which is done using services like;
Mobile Money (Airtel Money, MTN Mobile Money, M-Pesa, Smart Pesa and Africell Money),
PayWay, and E-Funds Transfer directly affects the revenue collected by Umeme (dependent
variable) in form of Prepaid fees (Yaka), Post Paid bills, Connection/Reconnection fees and
Assessment charges.
The figure also shows that other factors (intervening variable) such as politics, e-payment
charges, and Electricity Regulatory Authority (ERA) policies also intervene in this relationship.
7
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 Introduction
This section covers e-payment, the different types of e-payment in Uganda, and their
relationship with revenue collection as viewed by different scholars.
2.1 E-payment in Uganda
Uganda’s leader for mobile and online payment processing is Direct Pay Online because it
enables the businesses in Uganda to offer safe and secure credit card processing to local
customers as well as tourists, who can pay online with credit cards, mobile money, or bank
transfers in real-time. In Uganda, Direct Pay Online works with the following mobile providers;
Airtel and MTN. Direct Pay Online is partnered with Equity Bank in Uganda. Like most East
African nations, the government of Uganda has not imposed restrictions or regulations on
online or mobile payments. Businesses that are ready to offer online payments must comply
with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard and regulations of Visa, Mastercard,
and other credit card companies, but have no further bureaucracy in the form of national
restrictions or regulations (Bank of Uganda, 2017).
To provide a variety of adequate payment instruments to the growing corporations and the
corresponding increase in their transactions, Bank of Uganda in August 2003 implemented the
Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) for both credit transfers and direct debits. The EFT system
provides fast, convenient, reliable, and secure domestic payment and collection of funds (Bank
of Uganda, 2017).
Credit Transfers are predominantly being used by government and corporate customers to
transfer salary payments to the employees’/beneficiary’s account. Payment instructions using
this channel have picked up both in volumes and values especially after capping cheques to
UGX 20 million in July 2007, resulting in government stopping issuing cheques to its suppliers
and employees in favor of EFTs (Bank of Uganda, 2017).
Direct debits involve periodic financial instructions from a customer to his/her bank
authorizing a utility provider or any organization to collect funds from their account to settle
an obligation. Since January 2007, some schools have embraced EFTs for payment of
fees/tuition. EFT sensitization and technical workshops have been held in Mbarara, Kigezi,
Rwenzori, Mbale, and West Nile Regions (Bank of Uganda, 2017).
8
2.1.1 Mobile Money
Mobile money services were first introduced in March 2009; currently there are seven mobile
money schemes in Uganda. The main regulatory concern for the Bank of Uganda (BOU) has
been to ensure the safety of customers’ electronic value which they purchase, with cash, from
mobile money agents. The BOU has only approved mobile money operations when this is done
in partnership with a Supervised Financial Institution (SFI). Mobile Money Service Providers
(MMSP) are required to hold, in an escrow account in their partner SFI, the equivalent of all
the mobile money that has been issued to their customers and agents. MMSPs, which are not
regulated financial institutions cannot intermediate nor use the funds that have been mobilized
through the sale of mobile money (Ssettimba, 2016).
The ability to execute instantaneous person to Person transfers, compared to the alternatives of
transporting money in person or using a bus driver increases one’s purchasing power, implying
that they can consume immediately- this has a multiplier effect and positively impacts on
output. A World Bank study finds a 1 percent increase in financial inclusion corresponds to a
0.51 percent increase in business creation, and a 15 percent inclusion increase leads to
employment growth of 1 percent. Using mobile money instead of cash or cheque for makes it
simple, easy and quick for a taxpayer to settle their obligations. Voluntary compliance is
sometimes hindered by cost and difficulty of being compliant (Ssettimba, 2016).
The adoption of mobile money services has decreased administrative costs for companies.
Many firms, such as utility companies, spent significant time and money on the administration
and processing of paper bills. Incorporating electronic receipts and reporting has reduced costs
and improved speed and accuracy, reducing erroneous charges for arrears, for example.
Besides, mobile money has increased transaction speeds and reduced outstanding credit times,
minimizing how long it takes to collect and inquire after payments. The power company
UMEME, reported a 99.1% revenue collection rate in 2014 compared to 94% in 2012, the
increased revenue collection rate was partly attributable to an increase in mobile money
payments (Ssettimba, 2016).
2.1.2 PayWay
PayWay is an e-payment service provider in Uganda, a brand of African Vending Systems Ltd.
It is a private company that emerged on the Ugandan instant payments market in 2009. It
employs high-tech innovations to solve varying customer payment needs. Its main goal is to
9
develop and improve the capabilities of instant payment systems in Uganda and other African
countries as a whole. As a conduit between the various service providers, dealers, and endusers, it seeks to create convenient and effective partnerships that are of mutual benefit for all
(Mutua, 2017).
PayWay develops solutions for various platforms and ensures the convenience of payment
processes. It develops independent payment software for various platforms. As well as
designing and developing payment apps and devices to offer easy-to-use tools for every-day
payments including - public utilities and taxes, airtime top-ups, TV subscriptions, activations
for Internet bundles, loan repayments, purchasing of tickets, among others (Mutua, 2017).
The company’s mission is to provide the most affordable, secure, easy to use and convenient
means dedicated to solving all payment-related needs and more and a vision to develop into
the best and most preferred payment platform in the country, region, and Africa as a whole.
The Managing Director appointed by the Board of Directors is responsible for the running of
the company together with a team of Professional Staff. Current directors are George Matua
and Alexander Ingmann. PayWay is regulated by the National Information Technology
Authority - NITA and it’s a registered company under the laws governing the registration of
businesses in the country (Mutua, 2017).
The company also operates vending machines. Payway is a vending machine that can be found
at supermarkets and are an ideal way of loading internet airtime for all carriers let alone paying
for DSTV, Startimes, and GoTV. It saves a lot of time for airtime purchase bearing in mind
that if you had to buy scratch cards, you would have to enter one by one depending on the plan
you are on. The machine sends you an instant message on your phone to let you know that your
transaction was successful on top of an instant receipt. There is a toll-free number just in case
you are stuck (Mutua, 2017).
2.1.4 E-funds transfer
Fund transfers or payments are broadly defined to include non-cash payments to third parties,
cash withdrawals, and transfers from one account to another. Funds transfer is “a means of any
transfer of funds either representing an order of payment or transfer of money, which is initiated
by way of instruction, authorization or order to a financial institution to debit or credit an
account maintained with that financial institution and includes point of purchase transfers,
10
ATM transactions, direct deposits or withdrawal of funds, transfer initiated by telephone,
internet, card or other devices” (Humphrey et al., 2011)
Money transfers are generally characterized by the type of entities involved and the direction
of transfer. The most common types are from: (i) person to person (P2P), (ii) person to business
(P2B), (iii) business to person (B2P), and (iv) business to business (B2B). Adding local and
federal governments, transfers are also made from (v) person to governments (P2G), (vi)
governments to person (G2P), (vii) business to governments (B2G), and (viii) governments to
business (G2B). Leaving governments aside, P2P transfers hardly exist in the United States.
P2B transfers are also rare except for salary direct deposits. P2P transfers are either cash-based
or accomplished by writing personal paper checks (Knorr, 2008).
Electronic funds transfers via online banking require payers to input the bank account and
routing numbers of the person or business to whom they wish to send money and permit them
to add remarks, such as an invoice number or other reason for the transfer, if needed. The
recipient of a transfer, say, a family member, a friend, or a dentist, should be able to read the
credited amount and the reason for the credit transfer on her (online or paper) account
statement. In the case of a P2B transfer, the payee should be able to associate the transfer with
a payment for a specific service, corresponding to a specific bill (Kuttner and McAndrews,
2012).
2.2 Revenue collection
Electronic revenue collection tools are many and of a different kind as used by the
organizations. Plouffe et al (2000) shows that in the late 1990s, newspaper and magazine
headlines speak volumes about the lack of success of many smart card-based payment systems
trials undertaken. In their research when smart cards were compared to other payment systems,
the findings show that cash payment was favored by 80% (non- participating respondents) and
by 50% (participating respondents) compared to other four options of payment namely credit
cards, checks, debit or ATM cards, and the Exact card. However, many organizations are
protecting their business using technology, the overall process of revenue collection must be
coordinated. Duffy and Dale, (2008) argued that it is vital to ensure that all discounts, credits,
payments, deliveries, and credit card clearance are monitored and ideally controlled by one
financial system.
11
The goal of any tax authority is to establish a system of tax administration that allows for the
collection of required taxes at minimum cost. A tax authority engages in many activities, such
as processing returns and related information from taxpayers, entering tax return data into a
database, matching returns against filing requirements, processing tax payments and matching
them against assessments, and issuing assessments and refunds. One way to boost a tax
authority’s efficiency is by expanding its use of information and communication technology.
Such technology can facilitate a broad range of services, including registering taxpayers, filing
returns, processing payments, issuing assessments, and checking against third-party
information (Duffy and Dale, 2008).
2.2.1 Prepaid fees (Yaka)
Prepaid (Yaka) service is very different from the standard electricity service used by most
households. With standard service a customer receives a monthly bill to pay for the amount of
electricity used over the previous month. A prepaid consumer receives no bill. Instead the
customer pays in advance to open an account with Umeme. As the customer uses electricity,
Umeme deducts what the customer owes from the account. The customer monitors and
replenishes the account to make sure the money in the account does not run out as electricity
is used (Biedrzycki, 2013).
In making payments on the account, a prepaid customer has to follow the rules set by Umeme.
These rules in comparison to standard rules can make it more difficult for a low-income
customer to maintain a constant supply of electricity. Many prepaid electric customers have to
pay online and they are charged a fee to pay online. Prepaid service is offered to customers
who have advanced digital meters where disconnections and reconnections can be carried out
electronically with little time-lapse. Umeme is not permitted to charge fees for the
disconnection and reconnection of prepaid electric customers. However, this rule for utilities
does not always apply (Biedrzycki, 2013).
There is no limit to the number of times a consumer may have to pay for prepaid service for a
month. There is no limit to the number of times a consumer can be disconnected for running
out of funds in a month. Under many plans, fees for making payments, receiving statements of
usage and payment, and reconnection fees can become a substantial portion of the customer’s
cost for prepaid electric service. Prepaid service is risky. Prices can change frequently. Keeping
a constant supply of electricity is a challenge. It can be complicated and confusing. It may even
12
be impossible to know how much electricity you can use for the amount of money you prepay
into your account (Biedrzycki, 2013).
Shopping for prepaid electricity is more complicated than shopping for postpaid electricity.
The most basic element of choosing a plan, the price per kWh is seldom certain in a prepaid
plan. The differences in prices and the fees profoundly affect the total cost of electricity to the
consumer. Umeme needs to do more to ensure a competitive market where consumers can
select electricity service that best meets their needs at the lowest available price (Biedrzycki,
2013).
2.2.2 Postpaid bills
Postpaid form of electricity payment was the main form of electricity bill payment initially.
Umeme later introduced the prepaid (Yaka) means of electricity bill payment by installing
prepaid meters both in residential areas and commercial offices. The installation of the prepaid
meters was cut short because it did not function in some of the areas where the installation was
done. In Kampala, some residential and commercial areas still operate with the postpaid form
of electricity bill payment because of the stopped prepaid meter installation while the areas that
were fortunate enough to have been installed with fully functional prepaid meters still use the
new prepaid form of electricity bill payment (Kamenju, 2016).
Postpaid form of electricity bill payment is the form that uses an electricity meter which counts
and accumulates the units that you have used by the end of the one month. Umeme
subsequently sends the electricity bill to your post office address in good time for you to arrange
for payments early enough and make the bill payment before the date stipulated in writing on
the electricity bill. The bill also clearly states that failure to pay for the bill will result in the
company disconnecting your power supply leading you to pay for a re-connection fee as a fine
or in some instances it might lead to permanent disconnection which is a big loss (Kamenju,
2016).
In many cases the installation of postpaid meters is usually already done by Umeme before the
property is developed completely and this makes it convenient for you and ready for use when
relocating to the developed house as a tenant or as a property buyer. The postpaid bill is sent
to your post office address in good time before disconnection is carried out hence buying you
enough time to arrange for payments. One does not need to worry himself regarding a reduction
in the number of units while usage. This is because regardless of how many units you use they
13
will all accumulate and, in the end, and sum up on a bill that Umeme will send to you which is
very convenient for your electricity usage. You can always check your electricity bill via your
mobile phone. You can always pay your postpaid electricity bill via the mobile money transfer
service (Kamenju, 2016).
However, on the other side, it’s very easy for someone to tamper with your meter in your
absence. Postpaid meters take much time to get repaired in case of damage. The risk of illegal
electricity connection is very high because of the connection exposure of the postpaid meter
(Kamenju, 2016).
2.2.3 Connection/Reconnection fees
Sixty percent of Ugandans wishing to access electricity shied away because of high connection
charges, according to the National Service Delivery Survey (NSDS) 2015 report. The report
says 21 percent of the respondents wishing to have electricity but shied away, blamed poverty
while 17 percent blamed it on high end-user charges. The report indicates that connection
charges range between Shs 98,000 and Shs 2m (Wesonga, 2016).
Where one decides to apply for electricity connection, an inspection fee of Shs41, 000 has to
be paid first to the electricity distribution company. There are 10 distribution companies in
Uganda although the two main ones by clientele size are Umeme Uganda and Ferdsult
Engineering Services. During an interview with Ferdsult’s planning and finance director, Mr.
Bonny Kizza, said that sparse population settlement patterns increase operational and
consequently, connection costs (Wesonga, 2016).
Asked about the company’s connection fees, Umeme’s media manager Stephen Ilungole said
complaints of high charges are unjustified. “The average cost of an electricity pole is Shs
800,000. If we had not subsidized it, the complaint about connection fees being high would be
justified,” he said (Wesonga, 2016).
The Uganda Bureau of Statistics 2016 report indicated that presently, only 20 percent of
Ugandans access electricity, and the government intends to increase this to 30 percent by 2020.
In 2014, the government launched the output-based aid project through which it intended to
connect at least 655, 000 rural households to electricity. Under the project, households that had
been close to an electricity pole for at least 18 months but could not afford the assessment fees
could be connected. In case the distribution utility, such as Umeme, or a concessionaire like
14
the Rural Electrification Agency was satisfied with the internal wiring of the household, it
would then connect such a customer (Wesonga, 2016).
Despite some efficiency gains many urban poor are still unable to access mains power supply
particularly in areas of high population density. The cost of connection remains relatively high
and illegal connections and tariffs based on meter bypasses, whilst not cheaper in terms of unit
costs, are often more financially accessible to the poor as they offer a means for people to
spread payments and pay for supply when they most need it. There is arguably limited interest
in supplying poorer sections of the community by the provider due to perceptions of difficulty
with revenue collection/willingness and ability to pay. Lack of access increases security risks
at night and constrains small business activity/options. Revenue collection and payment
systems have not significantly evolved and are still heavily reliant on a manual billing process
which is often subject to lengthy delays and errors. While it is possible to now make payment
within banks the sector has yet to develop options for making payment through other platforms
and has been very slow to try out new innovative means of improving efficiency. For example,
UMEME received a report in 2007 on prepaid metering but only began a pilot project to test
feasibility in 2011 (ERA, 2011).
2.3 E-payment charges
At the beginning of the 21st Century, many of us were suddenly pushed to explore digital modes
of making payments even for the most basic of purchases like buying daily rations and paying
simple bills like Electricity and TV. While a lot of us have moved to electronic payments, not
many are aware of the costs attached to it. One of the examples of e-payment is Electronic
funds transfer (EFT). One can access this service either by using Internet banking or by visiting
the bank branch. (Not all bank branches are enabled with this service.) Once you initiate the
transfer, the money reaches the beneficiary account within hours. There is no minimum or
maximum amount, however, an individual bank may put restrictions on per transaction amount.
This service does not come free of charge. The bank levies certain charges based on the amount
being transferred (Kamenju, 2016).
2.4 E-payment and revenue collection
Though the major aim of Revenue Collection for most government parastatals is to stimulate
and guide the economic and social development of the country, there are several determinants
for an effective realization of the exercise. As such government parastatals are successfully
15
implementing e-payment to overcome the challenges of the corruption earlier experienced and
therefore enhance optimal revenue collection. According to Balunywa et al. (2014), the use of
Information Communication Technology (ICT), such as e-payment, would considerably
increase the revenue collection as it helps tracking noncompliant revenue payers.
Thus, the implementation of e-payment is paramount in ensuring optimal revenue collection.
Various ICT based revenue collection applications are available for use in the modern world
today. These are simply referred to as Electronic Payment (E- payment) system (Ndunda, et.
al., 2015), integrated into revenue collection. The e-payment system is accessible online
through Point of Sale (PoS) terminal devices and physical agents (such as mobile phones, debit
cards, agents, mobile money). The e-payment is intended to help the companies using it to
eliminate or reduce and minimize corruption (some of the problems inherent in the settlement
and payment process), by allowing customers to pay their bills without having to move to the
firm premises. The customers have access to their account information and even transfer money
to other accounts in the comfort of their homes (Wahab, 2012).
2.4.1 The effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection
By definition, efficiency means achieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort
or expense. In our case, mobile money has proved to be efficient by reducing delivery time and
costs. Given the popularity of mobile money and that over 22 million customers in Uganda
now have mobile money accounts, the government should continue promoting revenue
collection through mobile money. Maybe then, the number of defaulters will be reduced (BOU,
2017). Mobile money may mean that we end up having so many small companies and
individuals paying little sums as tax, which is better than our current situation where only a
few companies and individuals are paying their taxes. The primary case for innovative finance
is to increase revenue flows and aiding revenue collection. However, mobile money will also
help reduce our financial exclusion statistic. Business may start encouraging the use of mobile
money as they will need e-float to be able to remit (Muhumuza, 2016).
Ugandans carry out Shs 22 billion transactions per day on mobile money. One of the findings
is that mobile money can facilitate the effectiveness of monetary policy to the extent that it
improves financial inclusion. Mobile money services were introduced in Uganda in March
2009. There are various mobile money schemes: MTN Mobile Money, Airtel Money, M-Sente,
M-cash, and Africell Money. Power company Umeme, reported a 99.1 percent revenue
16
collection rate in 2014 compared to 94 percent in 2012. The increased revenue collection rate
was partly attributable to an increase in mobile money payments (Muhumuza, 2016).
Bank of Uganda only approved mobile money operations after the providers entered
partnership with Supervised Financial Institutions. Mobile money service providers (MMSP)
are required to hold money in an escrow account in Supervised Financial Institution (SFI). The
money should be the equivalent of all the mobile money issued to their customers and agents.
Ivan James Ssettimba, BOU's deputy director in charge of National Payment Systems says
there is evidence that mobile money has increased transaction speeds and reduced outstanding
credit times, minimizing how long it takes to collect and inquire after payments (BOU, 2017).
After the first attempt with Warid Telecom failed, Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) tapped
MTN Uganda to allow tax payments using mobile money services. The second attempt at using
mobile money for tax payment allows taxpayers to use mobile money for clearance of taxes
and other non-tax revenue like driving permits, passport fees, government tender fees and court
fines, among others. Taxpayers have a transaction limit of Shs4 million. URA is transforming
into a client-centric organization. Anyone that accepts payments to be made and doesn’t
recognize mobile money payments is not client-centric, said Ms. Doris Akol, the
Commissioner-General URA (Muhumuza, 2016).
In 2012, URA signed a similar agreement with then Warid Telecom and Orient Bank but a year
later the deal fell through when Airtel acquired Warid. The buyer did not continue with the
payment system but still, they offered fewer options when it came to the types of taxes. MTN
Uganda currently has about 10 million mobile money subscribers that URA tapped. The
platform also facilitates payment of utility bills and pay-tv. According to Mr. Brian Gouldie,
the chief executive officer of MTN Uganda, this has taken taxpayers off the queues in banking
halls (Muhumuza, 2016).
The invention of “Mobile Money Banking” has been adopted in urban governments in East
Africa to promote efficient and unconventional (smart) revenue collection and payments as
well as financial inclusion. In Uganda, local and urban authorities are steadily adopting smart
local revenue collections and payment systems through Mobile Money to collect revenues from
both dwellers and businesses in Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA). The shift to
unconventional revenue collection comes at the helm of growing outcry of corruption, bribery,
17
extra illegal extortion of revenues, and high costs of revenue mobilization in Kampala Capital
City Authority (Matsiko, 2018).
Therefore, the intentions were: promote convenient and cost-effective of revenue transactions,
discourage direct interactions and negotiations between revenues authorities and payers. Here
smart revenue collections were introduced. For instance, MTN and Airtel. Mobile Money
services facilitate the transfer of payments initiated only through registered mobile phones.
Similarly, “PayWay” is an integrated broad-based bill payment and money transfer system with
a platform used to collect and facilitate the revenue collection from citizens. Besides, as the
conventional banking systems are rigid and far from the reach of the citizens, the shift to
unconventional revenue collection systems remains the only option to promote financial
inclusion. The geographically hard to reach citizens can pay local revenues without extra costs:
travel, time and bank costs (Matsiko, 2018).
2.4.2 The effect of PayWay on revenue collection
Until a few years ago, payment systems throughout Uganda, including in urban areas were
almost exclusively based on direct physical payment and revenue collection by representatives
of the service provider with almost exclusively manual paper-based records of users kept.
Payment either took place door to door or users were required to visit cash offices maintained
by the service provider. This presented some problems to both service providers and service
users, particularly to the urban poor. The introduction of PayWay partly solved these problems
(Ndiwalana and Popov, 2008).
In addition to the above, high costs and inefficiencies in revenue collection and payment
systems would frequently result in people being more likely to resort to illegal connections or
unofficial service provision for which they would often pay more per unit consumption (in the
case of electricity and water) and which would result in a loss of revenue for the service
providers. In some cases, issues related to the inability to provide services that were accessible
to the poor and to collect sufficient revenue to maintain services has led to situations where
essential services are simply unavailable to significant numbers of people (Okure, 2008).
One supplier “Pay Way” who originated from Russia offers payment kiosks and mobile points
of service agents or retailers (who use a handheld device) to collect payments and produce both
printed receipts and payment confirmation by mobile phone. Payway works on three platforms;
the self-service kiosk, the mobile Point of Sale, and the web interface. Currently it is possible
18
to pay for TV connections, mobile phone airtime and other services using this. Again, it is
currently appealing to the high end of its potential consumer base but has the potential to
provide a wider range of services that are of major interest to the people and in locations that
are accessible to them (ERA, 2009).
Achievements in the electricity sector suggest that it is possible to turn around a service/sector
which is performing poorly and in which there is low public confidence and to improve service
delivery, efficiency, and its public image. It also suggests that it is possible to do this whilst
providing better services to the people and there is at least some evidence that if a service is
perceived to be effective and more transparent that this increases people’s willingness to pay.
Improved efficiency in terms of payment and revenue collection systems and the use of
available new technologies like PayWay can be an important element of a change strategy
within such services. However, the experience in the electricity sector also suggests that
developments in payment and revenue collection have to be seen as components of an overall
and integrated reform process if they are to realize their full potential (ERA, 2011).
To tap into the informal sector and help taxpayers meet their obligations timely and
conveniently, Uganda Revenue Authority launched URA services catalog, which offers
information about all URA services and a service payment method known as PayWay in
addition to the existing payment platforms such as MTN mobile payment, Mobile App and
banks. URA is hopeful that PayWay will enable the reduction of turnaround time for the
taxpayers and hence increase their efficiency and profitability (Matsiko, 2018).
2.4.3 The effect of E-Funds Transfer on revenue collection
Electronic funds transfer is one of the oldest electronic payment systems. EFT is the
groundwork of the cash-less and check-less culture where paper bills, checks, envelopes,
stamps are eliminated. EFT is used for transferring money from one bank account directly to
another without any paper money changing hands. The most popular application of EFT is that
instead of getting a paycheck and putting it into a bank account, the money is deposited into an
account electronically. EFT is considered to be a safe, reliable, and convenient way to conduct
business. The advantages of EFT are; simplified accounting, improved efficiency, reduced
administrative costs, and improved security (Sadler, 2017).
Similar to regular cash, e-cash enables transactions between customers without the need for
banks or other third parties. When used, e-cash is transferred directly and immediately to the
19
participating merchants and vending machines. Electronic cash is a secure and convenient
alternative to bills and coins. This payment system complements credit, debit, and charge cards
and adds additional convenience and control to everyday customer cash transactions. E-cash
usually operates on a smart card, which includes an embedded microprocessor chip. The
microprocessor chip stores cash value and the security features that make electronic
transactions secure (Pariwat & Hataiseree 2004).
You can still get your tax refund directly deposited into your account. Simply provide your
banking information to URA at the time you are submitting your taxes. Direct deposit is the
safest, easiest, and most convenient way to receive your tax refund, regardless of how you file
your taxes. Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) provides your office with the capability to:
automate your payments, electronically update your account information, and streamline your
cash flow. By using EFT, you eliminate the risks associated with lost, stolen, or misdirected
checks. With EFT, you save yourself and your company valuable time. EFT eliminates excess
paper and helps you automate the office (Gikandi and Bloor, 2010).
The fund transfer process generally consists of a series of electronic messages sent between
financial institutions directing each to make debit and credit accounting entries necessary to
complete the transaction. The fund transfer can generally be described as a series of payment
instruction messages, beginning with the originator’s (Sending customer’s) instructions, and
including a series of further instructions between the participating institutions, to make
payment to the beneficiary (Receiving customer’s). Once an amount is transferred, the bank
cannot reverse a transaction. If you entered the target account number incorrectly, there is no
way to reverse the transaction since the bank would process the transaction under the belief
that the information you provided is accurate (Kaburia, 2014).
One of the major disadvantages of EFT is the risk of Security issues. Electronic banking largest
adversary is the hackers who try to steal the customer’s money and their information. When
the account has been compromised, money can be stolen. Hackers can also use the information
obtained to steal one’s identity. This could mean a lot of trouble for the customer that can take
years to fix. One’s credit accounts are opened in his or her name it can be many years before
the debts are taken care of and removed off of their credit report (Gikandi and Bloor, 2010).
In the United States, EFTs are also sometimes referred to as ACH transactions. ACH stands
for Automated Clearing House, which is the nationwide electronic payment network that
20
allows the actual clearing of electronic payments and payment-related information between
financial institutions. Payment-related information can be sent along with ACH transactions, a
process known as electronic data interchange, or EDI (Sadler, 2017).
Companies that receive EFT payments from customers also enjoy cash-flow advantages
because they are assured that payments will be made automatically on the date they’re due
rather than having to wait for checks that may or may not be “in the mail.” Utility companies
and health clubs were among the first businesses to begin using EFT on a large-scale basis, but
smaller firms can enjoy the same cost savings and cash flow benefits (Abor, 2014).
While many of these same benefits can be accrued by accepting credit cards as an automatic
payment method, EFT debits and credits are usually less expensive because they incur a flat
fee per transaction instead of a percentage of each transaction amount. The larger the
transaction the more expensive accepting a credit card is. Also, bank accounts don’t have
expiration dates like credit cards do; and people rarely switch banks, so there’s less risk of
bounced EFT transactions (Sadler, 2017).
Using the EFT is also a green alternative to mailing and processing hundreds or even thousands
of checks. It reduces the resources used in the creation and transportation of paper checks,
including fossil fuels, trees, and water, and limits the amount of greenhouse gasses released
into the atmosphere. Finally, EFT transfers are safe and secure. Since the inception of the EFT
nearly 40 years ago, there has not been a single reported instance of an EFT payment being lost
(Sadler, 2017).
2.5 Summary of literature review
From the various literature on the study, it is clear that electronic payments play a vital role in
revenue collection. For example, as stated by Balunywa et al. (2014), the use of Information
Communication Technology (ICT), such as e-payment, considerably increases the revenue
collection as it helps to track noncompliant revenue payers.
21
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction
This presents the procedures that were used in collecting data for the research. It describes the
research design that was used, the target population, sample size and sampling techniques, the
data collection instruments, data collection procedure, validity, and reliability of the research
instruments and methods that were used in analyzing data.
3.1 Research design
The study adopted a cross-sectional research design. This technique collects data at a particular
point in time. Data for this study were collected using a combination of both primary and
secondary sources to obtain quantitative data. This was accomplished by the use of
questionnaires and reviews of records or documents for numeric data.
3.2 Study Population
The population of the study was the employees of Umeme Nakulabye branch. The branch has
55 permanent employees in the following departments; Finance, Human Resource
Management, Administration and Management, and Operations Management.
3.3 Sample size, design and procedure
The sample size, procedure and design were determined as follows;
3.3.1 Sample size
A sample size of 48 respondents was selected from the total population using simple random
sampling. This sample constituted employees of various departments at Umeme Nakulabye
branch. It was determined using the table developed by Krejcie & Morgan (1970) for
determining the sample size of a given population.
Table 1: Distribution of Sample Size
Category
Population (N)
Sample size (S)
Staff at Finance Department
14
10
Staff at Human Resources Management
12
10
Staff at Administration and Management
10
10
Staff at Operational Management
19
18
Total
55
48
Source: Umeme Performance Report 2016, modified using Krejcie & Morgan (1970)
22
3.3.2 Sampling procedure
In this study the sample was selected randomly. Simple random sampling was applied in
selecting respondents from several departments at Umeme Nakulabye branch to provide equal
chances of everyone being included in the study.
3.3.3 Sampling design
The researcher used Probability (simple random) sampling technique. Simple random sampling
is selecting samples from a larger population size, giving all individuals an equal chance of
being included in the research. Respondents from the population were selected on probability
and in no particular order.
3.4 Data sources
Data was collected from both primary and secondary sources. Primary data was obtained from
the field by the use of data collection instruments which were questionnaires. Secondary data
was obtained from published and unpublished material, research reports, Newspapers, and the
internet.
3.5 Data collection methods and Instruments
3.5.1 Questionnaire
Questionnaires are data collection instruments through which subjects respond to questions or
statements that generally require factual information. A questionnaire with close-ended
questions was used in data collection. It enabled the researcher to get direct answers and hence
less time-consuming in responding. The questionnaires were used because they enable the
quick collection of data and the researcher does not need to be present when
the questionnaires are being completed.
3.5.2 Documentary review
This is a secondary data collection method. Secondary data refers to the data which has already
been collected and analyzed by someone else. Kothari emphasizes the value of documents as
they can provide more insight into the phenomenon being studied by cross-validating and
augmenting evidence from other sources. Relevant information was extracted and reviewed
from files, magazines, reports, and other records published and unpublished which contained
vital information about the study theme. This method was useful because it supplemented the
questionnaire methods of data collection.
23
3.6 Data collection instruments
3.6.1 Questionnaires
A self-administered questionnaire comprising several questions was designed and distributed
to the respondents to fill in the spaces meant for that purpose. The respondents had to answer
the questions on their own; this enabled them to give their views freely without any
interruption.
3.7 Data quality control
3.7.1 Validity
Validity refers to the extent to which the concept one wishes to measure is being measured by
a particular scale or index. It is the extent to which an account accurately represents the social
phenomena to which it refers. The validity of the instruments was measured through seeking
for views from experts at Ndejje University and Umeme Nakulabye branch who assisted on
the relevance of the scales in the instruments using Content Validity Index (CVI).
3.7.2 Reliability
Reliability refers to the consistency measure that produces the same results across time and
observers. The reliability of the questionnaires was enhanced through pre-testing of pilot
samples from the field which enabled the re-phrasing of some questions. Additionally, the
reliability of the items was done with the application of the Cronbach Coefficient Alpha for the
computations to check for the internal consistency of the items.
3.8 Data processing and analysis
3.8.1 Data processing
Data given to the researcher was edited and coded to ensure the accuracy and consistency of
the information collected. All the questionnaires from the respondents were checked for
completeness to avoid errors and omissions then it was coded and tabulated.
3.8.2 Data analysis
The analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 to
generate descriptive statistics such as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard
deviations. Descriptive statistics helped the researcher to describe the collected data while
inferential statistics such as correlations and regressions helped the researcher to test statistical
hypotheses.
24
3.9 Measurement of variables
The study variables were measured using item scales developed by Likert Rensis, (1932) with
modifications to fit the context of the study. A five-point Likert itemized scale was used to
construct the items and assess the level of the variables. The questionnaire was designed such
that 1 represents strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-uncertain, 4-agree and 5-strongly agree.
3.10 Research Procedure
The researcher obtained an introductory letter from the Research Coordinator, Ndejje
University which was presented to Umeme Nakulabye branch before starting the data
collection process. Sensitization of the respondents for the study was sought to enable efficient
and effective data collection. This enabled the researcher to carry out the study without fear
and substantive information was obtained.
3.11 Ethical consideration
This refers to the code of conduct while carrying out research. The researcher ensured that the
identified information was not made available to anyone who was not directly involved in the
research. The researcher provided an accurate account of the information. This accuracy
required debriefing between the researcher and the participants in the quantitative research.
3.12 Limitations and solutions
The unwillingness of the respondents to answer questions; however, the researcher was
prepared to do anything possible like to reach and convince the respondents to provide the
desired data.
The cost of research in terms of finance, time, and other academic undertakings was too much.
The researcher suspended all non-academic pursuits and obtain financial contributions from
friends and well-wishers.
Loss of questionnaires by some respondents which might lead to a standstill and delays in the
research process. This will be solved by printing a lot of questionnaires to replace the lost ones.
Research was conducted during the COVID-19 lockdown and it was difficult to move from
one place to another or trace the employees of Umeme. The researcher designed an electronic
questionnaire, asked for employees’ emails, and invited them to answer the questionnaire
online.
25
CHAPTER FOUR: PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS, ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATION
4.0 Introduction
This chapter contains the presentation of the study findings, analysis, and interpretation. The
study findings are presented in form of tables showing frequencies, percentages, mean scores
and standard deviation. The chapter was organized basing on the study objectives which were;
to determine the effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection, to examine the effect of
PayWay on revenue collection, and to determine the effect of eFunds Transfer on revenue
collection.
4.1 General information about the respondents
This section presents the study findings on the respondents’ background information. This
demographic information includes; gender, age, highest level of education, department of work,
and tenure of service in the organization. The researcher collected this data because it influenced
the extent to which the respondents were knowledgeable about the variables that were involved
in the study and the extent to which the information that they provided can be generalized to
similar organizations in Uganda.
4.1.1 Gender of respondents
The researcher wanted to find out whether the gender of the respondents that participated in
the study influences revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. The results are presented
in Table 2 below;
Table 2: Findings on the gender of the respondents
Frequency
Valid
Male
33
Female
15
Total
48
Source: Primary data -2020
Percent-
Valid Percent-
Cumulative
Percent-
From the study results, out of the 48 respondents that participated in the study, 33 (68.8%) were
males, while 15 (31.3%) were females. This shows that the biggest percentage of employees
working with Umeme -Nakulabye branch is male as compared to their female counterparts. It
further implies that males were more interested in the study than females.
26
4.1.2 Age of the respondents
The researcher was interested in finding out how the age of each of the respondent that
participated in the study affects revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. The results
are presented in the table below;
Table 3: Findings on the age of the respondents
Valid
21-30 years
31-40 years
Above 41 years
Total
Source: Primary data -2020
Frequency-
Percent-
Valid Percent-
Cumulative
Percent-
When asked to indicate their age, majority of the respondents 25 (52.1%) were between the age
of 31 and 40 years, 17 (35.4%) were between 21 and 30 years, 6 (12.5%) were above 41 years
and none of the respondents was below 20 years. This indicates that Umeme -Nakulabye branch
employs people of all working-age; the youths who are energetic to take on different tasks in
the organization and the elderly with senior experience about all the operations.
4.1.3 Level of education of the respondents
The researcher was interested in finding out whether education levels of the respondents that
participated in the study affect revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. The results
are presented in the table below;
Table 4: Findings on the level of education of the respondents
Frequency
Valid
Diploma
5
Degree
32
Masters
9
PhD
2
Total
48
Source: Primary data -2020
Percent-
Valid Percent-
Cumulative
Percent-
From the study findings, the majority of respondents that participated in the study, 32 (66.7%)
had Bachelors’ degrees, 5 (10.4%) were diploma holders, 9 (18.8%) had Master’s degrees and
27
2 (4.2%) had PhDs. This shows that the organization employs people of different education
qualifications basing on their capability to handle the various tasks. However, those with
Bachelor’s degrees constituted the majority. This is because degree holders go through
Universities where they acquire knowledge on various operations which Umeme -Nakulabye
branch requires.
4.1.4 Departments of work of the respondents
The researcher was interested in finding out whether the departments of work of employees at
Umeme -Nakulabye branch affect revenue collection. The results are presented in the table
below;
Table 5: Findings on the departments of work
Valid
Finance Department
Human Resource
Management
Administration &
Management
Operational Management
Others (Specify)
Total
Source: Primary data -2020
Frequency
6
7
Percent
12.5
14.6
Valid Percent
12.5
14.6
Cumulative
Percent
12.5
27.1
6
12.5
12.5
39.6
24
5
48
-
-
-
Asked about their departments of work in the organization, majority of respondents 24 (50.0%)
stated that they were working under operations management, 6 (12.5%) were in Administration
and Management, 7 (24.6%) were under Human Resource Management, 6 (12.5%) were in the
finance department, and 5 (10.4%) were in other departments. This implies that people from
different departments in the organization were interested in the study. This ensured the
researcher of unbiased study results. The majority were from the operations management
because it is the sector where all field technicians fall.
4.1.5 Tenure of service in the organization
The researcher was interested in finding out whether the length of time the respondents had
spent in the organization (Umeme -Nakulabye branch) affects revenue collection. The results
are presented in the table below;
28
Table 6: Findings on the tenure of service of the respondents in the organization
Valid
Less than 1 year
1-5 years
6-10 years
More than 10 years
Total
Source: Primary data -2020
Frequency-
Percent-
Valid Percent-
Cumulative
Percent-
The study found out that majority of the employees 33 (68.8%) that participated in the study
had worked with the organization for a period of 1 to 5 years, 2 (4.2%) had been in the
organization for less than a year, 10 (20.8%) had been in the Bank for (6-10) years, and 3
(6.3%) had worked for more than 10 years. The majority of the respondents that participated
in the research had spent 1 to 5 years in the organization because of the nature of the working
conditions for example; good salaries, and good welfare.
4.2 Electronic Payment (Independent Variable)
The findings presented below are views of respondents from Umeme -Nakulabye branch on
electronic payment (Independent variable) and revenue collection (Dependent variable).
Electronic payment includes; Mobile Money, PayWay, and E-Funds Transfer. The findings are
presented as follows;
4.2.1 The influence of Mobile Money on revenue collection
The aim was to determine the influence of Mobile Money on revenue collection. Respondents
were given several statements and asked to indicate the extent they agreed with each of them.
To achieve this, a 5-point itemized Likert scale was used. According to the scale, 1 point =
strongly disagree; 2 points = disagree; 3 points = not sure; 4 points = agree; and 5 points =
strongly agree. A standard deviation greater than 1 implies a significant variance meaning there
was no consensus in the responses while a standard deviation less than 1 shows that there
wasn’t much variance hence consensus in the responses.
29
Table 7: Descriptive Statistics for the effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection
Statement
Mobile money is efficient in
reducing delivery time and
transaction costs.
Mobile money has helped in
reducing financial exclusion.
Mobile money facilitates the
effectiveness of monetary
policy to the extent that it
improves financial inclusion.
The increased revenue
collection rate of Umeme is
partly attributable to an
increase in mobile money
payments.
Mobile money has increased
transaction speeds and reduced
outstanding credit times.
People use mobile money for
clearance of taxes and other
non-tax revenues.
Mobile Money platform
facilitates payment of utility
bills, school fees, medical
bills, and pay-tv.
Mobile Money Banking
promotes efficient and
unconventional revenue
collection.
In Uganda, authorities are
steadily adopting Mobile
Money to collect revenues
from both dwellers and
businesses
Mobile Money promotes
convenience, and encourages
direct interactions and
negotiations between revenues
authorities and payers
Overall Average
Source: Primary data -2020
1
2
3
4
5
Mean
S. Dev.
2
4.2%
7
14.6%
8
16.7%
28
58.3%
3
6.3%
3.48
.967
4
8.3%
2
4.2%
9
18.8%
18
37.5%
15
31.3%
3.79
1.184
5
10.4%
1
2.1%
7
14.6%
17
35.4%
18
37.5%
3.87
1.248
3
3.6%
5
10.4%
10
20.8%
19
39.6%
11
22.9%
3.63
1.142
3
6.3%
9
18.8%
9
18.8%
17
35.4%
10
20.8%
3.46
1.202
6
12.5%
4
8.3%
9
18.8%
12
25.0%
17
35.4%
3.63
1.378
6
12.5%
4
8.3%
14
29.2%
15
31.3%
9
18.8%
3.35
1.246
4
8.3%
3
6.3%
15
31.3%
18
37.5%
8
16.7%
3.48
1.111
3
6.3%
5
10.4%
16
33.3%
14
29.2%
10
20.8%
3.48
1.130
2
4.2%
5
10.4%
10
20.8%
17
35.4%
14
29.2%
3.75
1.120
3.59
1.173
30
From the study findings on the statement, “Mobile Money is efficient in reducing delivery time
and transaction costs.”, 58.3% of the respondents agreed with the statement, 6.3% strongly
agreed, 6.7% were not sure 14.6% disagreed and 4.2 strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.48
implies that most of the respondents were not sure about the statement. This implies that
respondents did not know whether transacting using Mobile Money reduces the transaction
time and costs or not. This implies that employees at Umeme Nakulabye branch need to be
sensitized about the benefits of Mobile Money.
On the statement “Mobile Money has helped in reducing financial exclusion.”, 37.5% of the
respondents agreed with the statement, 31.3% strongly agreed, 18.8% were not sure, 4.2%
disagreed and 8.3% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.79 implies that most of the
respondents agreed with the statement. Since the majority of respondents agreed with this
statement, it means that Mobile Money has promoted financial inclusion by enabling people in
remote areas to access financial services.
On the statement “Mobile Money facilitates the effectiveness of monetary policy to the extent
that it improves financial inclusion.”, majority of the respondents 37.5% strongly agreed with
the statement, 35.4% agreed, 14.6% were not sure, 2.1% disagreed and 10.4% strongly
disagreed. A mean score of 3.87 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the statement.
Since 72.9% of the respondents in total supported this statement, it implies that Mobile Money
has indeed promoted financial inclusion. As emphasized by Muhumuza (2016), Ugandans
carry out Shs 22 billion transactions per day on mobile money. Power company Umeme,
reported a 99.1 percent revenue collection rate in 2014 compared to 94 percent in 2012.
On the statement “The increased revenue collection rate of Umeme is partly attributable to an
increase in mobile money payments.”, 39.6% of the respondents agreed with the statement,
22.9% strongly agreed, 20.8% were not sure, 10.4% disagreed and 6.3% strongly disagreed. A
mean score of 3.63 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the statement. This means
that Mobile Money has a positive influence on Umeme -Nakulabye branch’s revenue
collection.
On the statement “Mobile Money has increased transaction speeds and reduced outstanding
credit times.”, 35.4% of the respondents agreed, 20.8% strongly agreed, 18.8% were not sure,
18.8% disagreed and 6.3% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 4.46 implies that on average,
31
the respondents were not sure about the statement. This means that, Mobile Money has eased
the payment of electricity bills thus minimizing the accumulation of credit. As stated by Ivan
James Ssettimba, BOU's deputy director in charge of National Payment Systems (BOU, 2017),
there is evidence that mobile money has increased transaction speeds and reduced outstanding
credit times, minimizing how long it takes to collect and inquire after payments.
On the statement “People use Mobile Money for clearance of taxes and other non-tax
revenues.”, 25.0% of the respondents agreed with the statement, 35.4% strongly agreed, 18.8%
were not sure, 8.3 disagreed and 12.5% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.63 implies that
most of the respondents agreed with the statement. This means that Mobile Money reduced the
burden of going to the banks to pay taxes. The long queues in the banks were preventing many
people from paying taxes. As stated by Muhumuza (2016), taxpayers use mobile money for
clearance of taxes and other non-tax revenue like driving permits, passport fees, government
tender fees, and court fines, among others.
On the statement “Mobile Money platform facilitates payment of utility bills, school fees,
medical bills, and pay-TV.”, 31.3% of the respondents agreed with the statement, 18.8%
strongly agreed, 29.2% were uncertain, 8.3% disagreed, and 12.5% strongly disagreed. A mean
score of 3.35 implies that most of the respondents were not sure about the statement. This
implies that respondents need to be sensitized about the different payments that can be done
through the Mobile Money system.
On the statement “Mobile Money Banking promotes efficient and unconventional revenue
collection.”, 37.5% of the respondents agreed with the statement, 16.7% strongly agreed,
31.3% were not sure, 6.3% disagreed, and 8.3% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.48
implies that most of the respondents were not sure about the statement. This means that, Mobile
Money facilitates easy payment of bills to utility companies Umeme inclusive.
On the statement “In Uganda, authorities are steadily adopting Mobile Money to collect
revenues from both dwellers and businesses”, 29.2% of the respondents agreed with the
statement, 20.8% strongly agreed, 33.3% were not sure, 10.4% disagreed and 6.3% strongly
disagreed on this statement. A mean score of 3.48 implies that most of the respondents were
not sure about this statement. As emphasized by Matsiko (2018), the shift to unconventional
revenue collection comes at the helm of growing outcry of corruption, bribery, extra illegal
32
extortion of revenues, and high costs of revenue mobilization in Kampala Capital City
Authority.
On the statement “Mobile Money promotes convenience, and encourages direct interactions
and negotiations between revenues authorities and payers”, 35.4% of the respondents agreed
on this statement, 29.2% strongly agreed, 20.8% were not sure, 10.4% disagreed, and 4.2%
strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.75 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the
statement. With the majority agreeing, it means that mobile money is one of the ways
authorities can use to reduce corruption, bribery, and extortion.
Generally, respondents agreed to a moderate degree that Mobile Money affects revenue
collection with an overall mean score of 3.59. An overall standard deviation of 1.173 indicates
that, there was no consensus in the responses. This generally means that Mobile Money
positively contributes to the revenue collection exercise at Umeme -Nakulabye branch.
4.2.1.1 Correlation between Mobile Money and revenue collection
To measure the relationship between Mobile Money and revenue collection, the researcher
carried out a correlation test. The results are presented in the table below;
Table 8: Showing Pearson correlation between Mobile Money and revenue collection
Mobile Money
Mobile Money
Revenue collection
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
1
48
.386**
.007
48
Revenue
collection
.386**
-
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
The table above shows the relationship between Mobile Money (independent variable) and
revenue collection (dependent variable). It shows that, the correlation between Mobile Money
and revenue collection is r = 0.386. This implies that there is a significant (0.007) positive
relationship between Mobile Money and revenue collection. It also means that Mobile Money
influences revenue collection at Umeme Nakulabye branch by a magnitude of 38.6%. The
33
remaining 61.4% is influenced by other strategies. The positive value of (r) means that an
increased use of mobile money leads to a corresponding increase in revenue collection and vice
versa.
4.3.2 Regression test
To determine the effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection, the researcher carried out a
linear regression test. The results are presented in the tables below;
Table 9: Showing model summary for Mobile Money and revenue collection
Model
1
R
.386
a
R Square
.149
Adjusted R Square
.130
Std. Error of the
Estimate
.461
a. Predictors: (Constant), Mobile Money
Table 9 above shows R, R Square, and Adjusted RSquare values. R represents Pearson’s
correlation coefficient which is 0.386, indicating a low degree of correlation. R Square is the
coefficient of determination which shows the proportion of the variance in the dependent
variable that is predictable from the independent variable. Adjusted R Square is the modified
version of R-square that measures how much of the variation in revenue collection is explained
by the variations in the use of mobile money. In this case, 13.0% (adjusted R square of 0.130)
reveals that the sample reflected 13.0% of the phenomenon in the population, the remaining
87.0% of the phenomenon being contributed by other strategies.
Table 10: Showing ANOVA values for Mobile Money and revenue collection
Model
Sum of Squares
1
Regression
1.705
Residual
9.760
Total
11.465
a. Dependent Variable: Revenue collection
df
Mean Square-
.212
47
F
8.037
Sig.
.007b
b. Predictors: (Constant), Mobile Money
The ANOVA table above is used to test the null hypothesis. The value of the calculated F is
8.037 for the variance generated by the regression. By comparing the values of F, it results that
it is compulsory to accept the alternative hypothesis (Mobile Money affects revenue collection
at Umeme -Nakulabye branch), meaning that not all regression coefficients are equal to zero.
34
This means that a significant influence of the regression model occurs over the dependent
variable.
Table 11: Regression coefficients for Mobile Money and revenue collection
Model
1
(Constant)
Mobile
Money
Unstandardized Coefficients
B
Std. Error
2.385
.541
.424
.149
Standardized
Coefficients
Beta
.386
t-
Sig.
.000
.007
a. Dependent Variable: Revenue Collection
The beta value of 0.386 reveals that mobile money explained 38.6% of the variance in the
dependent variable (revenue collection of Umeme), the remaining 61.4% is explained by other
strategies. The regression coefficient r =.007 was significant implying that if Umeme wants to
improve its revenue collection, then, it can manipulate mobile money as a strategy to realize
its objective.
4.2.2 The effect of PayWay on revenue collection
The aim was to determine the effect of PayWay on revenue collection. Respondents were also
given numerous statements and asked to indicate the extent they agreed with each of them
using a scale: 1 point = strongly disagree; 2 points = disagree; 3 points = not sure; 4 points =
agree, and 5 points = strongly agree. A standard deviation greater than 1 implies a significant
variance meaning there was no consensus in the responses while a standard deviation less than
1 shows that there wasn’t much variance hence consensus in responses.
35
Table 12: Descriptive Statistics for the effect of PayWay on revenue collection
Statement
PayWay partly solved the
problem of direct physical
payment and revenue
collection by service
providers.
PayWay solved the problem
of high costs and
inefficiencies in revenue
collection and payment
systems.
PayWay helped to minimize
illegal connections which
resulted in loss of revenue.
Pay Way offers payment
kiosks and mobile point of
sale services.
Payway works on the selfservice kiosk, the mobile
Point of Sale, and the web
interface.
It is possible to pay for TV,
phone airtime using PayWay.
PayWay improves the
efficiency of payment and
revenue collection systems.
Umeme uses PayWay to help
clients meet their obligations
timely and conveniently.
Umeme believes that
PayWay enables the
reduction of turnaround time
for the payments hence
increased efficiency and
profitability.
PayWay is a
component of an integrated
payment reform process.
Overall Average
Source: Primary data -2020
1
2
3
4
5
4
3
4
18
19
8.3%
6.3%
8.3%
37.5%
39.6%
2
11
8
15
12
4.2%
22.9%
16.7%
31.3%
25.0%
7
4
10
16
11
14.6%
8.3%
20.8%
33.3%
22.9%
5
2
4
25
12
10.4%
4.2%
8.3%
52.1%
25.0 %
0
6
9
12
21
0.0%
12.5%
18.8%
25.0%
43.8%
1
4
9
21
2.1%
2
8.3%
5
18.8%
7
4.2%
10.4%
3
Mean S. Dev.
3.94
1.227
3.50
1.220
3.42
1.334
3.77
1.189
4.00
1.072
13
3.85
0.989
43.8%
26
27.1%
8
3.69
1.014
14.6%
54.2%
16.7%
9
7
16
13
3.56
1.253
6.3%
18.8%
14.6%
33.3%
27.1%
2
2
5
17
22
4.15
1.052
4.2%
4.2%
10.4%
35.4%
45.8%
2
6
4
21
15
3.85
1.130
4.2%
12.5%
8.3%
43.8%
31.3%
3.77
1.148
36
From the study findings on the statement “PayWay partly solved the problem of direct physical
payment and revenue collection by service providers.”, 37.5% of the respondents agreed with
the statement, 39.6% strongly agreed, 8.3% were uncertain, 6.3% disagreed and 8.3% strongly
disagreed. A mean score of 3.94 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the
statement. Since the majority agreed, it means that PayWay somehow eliminated the direct
collection of fees from customers by Umeme workers which was associated with bribery and
extortion.
On the statement “PayWay solved the problem of high costs and inefficiencies in revenue
collection and payment systems.”, 31.3% of the respondents agreed with the statement, 25.0%
strongly agreed, 16.7% were not sure 22.9% disagreed and 4.2% strongly disagreed with this
statement. A mean score of 3.50 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the statement.
This means PayWay as a bills payment platform is reliable and efficient.
On the statement “PayWay helped to minimize illegal connections or unofficial service
provision which resulted in loss of revenue.”, 33.3% of the respondents agreed with the
statement, 22.9% strongly agreed, 20.8% were not sure 8.3% disagreed and 14.6% strongly
disagreed on this statement. A mean score of 3.42 implies that most of the respondents were
not sure about the statement. In the researcher’s view, some of the respondents were the
beneficiaries of the illegal and unofficial electricity services provision commonly known as
‘Kamyufu’, so, it was hard for them to admit that PayWay helped to overcome this problem.
On the statement “PayWay offers payment kiosks and mobile point of sale services.”, 52.1%
of the respondents agreed, 25.0% strongly agreed, 8.3% were not sure, 4.2% disagreed, and
10.4% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.77 implies that most of the respondents agreed
with the statement. As stated by ERA (2009), PayWay works on three platforms; the selfservice kiosk, the mobile Point of Sale, and the web interface. Currently it is possible to pay
for TV connections, mobile phone airtime and other services using this. Again, it is currently
appealing to the high end of its potential consumer base but has the potential to provide a wider
range of services that are of major interest to the people and in locations that are accessible to
them.
On the statement “PayWay works on the self-service kiosk, the mobile Point of Sale, and the
web interface.”, 25.0% of the respondents agreed, 43.8% strongly agreed, 18.8% were not sure
37
and 12.5% disagreed. A mean score of 4.00 implies that most of the respondents agreed with
the statement. This confirms that PayWay works on the above mentioned three platforms which
increases its accessibility and ease of paying bills.
On the statement “It is possible to pay for TV, phone airtime using PayWay.”, 43.8% of the
respondents agreed, 27.1% strongly agreed, 18.8% were not sure 8.3% disagreed, and 2.1
strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.85 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the
statement. This implies that PayWay offers numerous services in addition to paying utility
bills.
On the statement “PayWay improves the efficiency of payment and revenue collection
systems.”, 54.2% of the respondents agreed, 16.7% strongly agreed, 14.6% were not sure,
10.4% disagreed, and 4.2% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.69 implies that most of the
respondents agreed with the statement. As stated by ERA (2011), improved efficiency in terms
of payment and revenue collection systems and the use of available new technologies like
PayWay can be an important element of a change strategy within such services. However,
developments in payment and revenue collection have to be seen as components of an overall
integrated reform process if they are to realize their full potential.
On the statement “Umeme uses PayWay to help clients meet their obligations timely and
conveniently.”, 33.3% of the respondents agreed, 27.1% strongly agreed, 14.6% were not sure,
18.8% disagreed, and 6.3% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.56 implies that most of the
respondents agreed with the statement. This means that people can pay their electricity bills
from anywhere and at any time thereby minimizing the defaulting of payments.
On the statement “Umeme believes that PayWay enables the reduction of turnaround time for
the payments hence increased efficiency and profitability.”, 35.4% of the respondents agreed,
45.8% strongly agreed, 10.4% were not sure, 4.2% disagreed, and strongly disagreed
respectively. A mean score of 4.15 implies that most of the respondents strongly agreed with
the statement. This means that PayWay greatly reduces the time needed to make a transaction.
On the statement “PayWay is a component of an integrated payment reform process”, 43.8%
of the respondents agreed, 31.3% strongly agreed, 8.3% were not sure and 12.5% disagreed,
and 4.2% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.85 implies that most of the respondents agreed
38
with the statement. This means that PayWay a new system and there is a need to sensitize the
masses about it and its benefits.
Respondents generally agreed to the statements concerning the effect of PayWay on revenue
collection with an overall mean score of 3.77. An overall standard deviation of 1.148 indicates
that, there was no consensus in the responses. This means that PayWay influences the tax
collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch.
4.2.2.1 Correlation between PayWay and revenue collection
To measure the relationship between PayWay and revenue collection, the researcher carried
out a correlation test. The results are presented in the table below;
Table 13: Showing Pearson correlation between PayWay and revenue collection
PayWay
PayWay
Revenue Collection
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
1
48
.533**
.000
48
Revenue
Collection
.533**
-
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table 13 above shows the relationship between PayWay (independent variable) and revenue
collection (dependent variable). It shows that, the correlation between PayWay and revenue
collection is r = 0.533. This implies that there is a significant (0.000) positive relationship
between PayWay and revenue collection at Umeme. It also means that the PayWay influences
revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch by a magnitude of 53.3%. The remaining
46.7% is influenced by other strategies. The positive value of (r) means that an increase in the
use of PayWay leads to a corresponding increase in revenue collection and vice versa.
4.3.2 Regression test
To determine the effect of PayWay on revenue collection, the researcher carried out a linear
regression test. The results are presented in the tables below;
39
Table 14: Showing model summary for PayWay and revenue collection
Model
1
R
.533
a
R Square
.284
Adjusted R Square
.268
Std. Error of the
Estimate
.423
a. Predictors: (Constant), PayWay
Table 14 above shows R, R Square, and Adjusted R Square values. R represents Pearson’s
correlation coefficient which is 0.533, indicating a moderate degree of correlation. R Square is
the coefficient of determination which shows the proportion of the variance in the dependent
variable that is predictable from the independent variable. Adjusted R Square is the modified
version of R-square that measures how much of the variation in revenue collection is explained
by the variations in the use of PayWay. In this case, the sample reflects 26.8% of the
phenomenon in the population, the remaining 73.2% being accountable to other factors.
Table 15: Showing ANOVA values for PayWay and revenue collection
Model
1
Regression
Residual
Total
Sum of Squares-
df
Mean Square-
.179
47
F
18.223
Sig.
.000b
a. Dependent Variable: Revenue Collection
b. Predictors: (Constant), PayWay
The ANOVA table above is used to test the null hypothesis. The value of the calculated F is
18.223 for the variance generated by the regression. By comparing the values of F, it results
that it is compulsory to reject the null hypothesis (PayWay doesn't affect revenue collection),
meaning that not all regression coefficients are equal to zero. This means that a significant
influence of the regression model occurs over the dependent variable.
Table 16: Regression coefficients for PayWay and revenue collection
Model
1
(Constant)
PayWay
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Beta
1.868
.482
.541
.127
.533
a. Dependent Variable: Revenue collection
40
t-
Sig.
.000
.000
The beta value of 0.533 reveals that the use of PayWay explained 53.3% of the variance in the
dependent variable (revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch), the remaining 46.7% is
explained by other strategies. The regression coefficient r =.000 was significant implying that
if Umeme -Nakulabye branch wants to improve its revenue collection, then, it can manipulate
PayWay as a strategy to realize its objective.
4.2.3 The effect of Electronic Funds Transfer on revenue collection
The aim was to determine the effect of Electronic Funds Transfer on revenue collection.
Respondents were provided with several statements and asked to indicate to what extent they
agreed with them, using the scale: 1 point = strongly disagree; 2 points = disagree; 3 points =
not sure; 4 points = agree, and 5 points = strongly agree. A standard deviation greater than 1
implies a significant variance meaning there was no consensus in the responses while a
standard deviation of less than 1 shows that there wasn’t significance variance hence consensus
in responses.
41
Table 17: Descriptive Statistics for the effect of E-Funds Transfer and revenue collection
Statement
E-Funds transfer is used to
transfer money directly
from one bank account to
another.
In E-Funds Transfer, the
money is deposited into an
account electronically.
E-Funds Transfer provides
the capability to automate
payments and streamline
cash flow.
E-Funds Transfer
eliminates the risks
associated with lost,
misdirected checks.
There is no way to reverse
a transaction under the EFunds Transfer method.
Hackers can try to steal
customer’s money and
information electronically.
Companies that receive EFunds Transfer payments
from customers enjoy
cash-flow advantages.
Utility companies are
among the first businesses
to begin using E-Funds
Transfer on a large-scale
basis
E-Funds Transfer debits
and credits are usually less
expensive because of a flat
fee per transaction.
Using E-Funds Transfer is
an alternative to mailing
and processing multiple
checks.
Overall Average
Source: Primary data -2020
1
2
2
0
3
5
4
22
5
19
4.2%
0%
10.4%
45.8%
39.6%
1
5
8
16
18
2.1%
10.4%
16.7%
33.3%
37.5%
1
5
7
19
16
2.1%
10.4%
14.6%
39.6%
33.3%
4
5
9
20
10
8.3%
10.4%
18.8%
41.7%
20.8%
4
12
9
9
14
8.3%
25.0%
18.8%
18.8%
29.2%
2
2
8
20
16
4.2%
4.2%
16.7%
41.7%
33.3%
11
5
3
16
13
22.9%
10.4%
6.3%
33.3%
27.1%
0
6
3
21
18
0%
12.5%
6.3%
43.8%
37.5%
2
3
6
25
12
4.2%
6.3%
12.5%
52.1%
25.0%
1
1
4
17
25
2.1%
2.1%
8.3%
35.4%
52.1%
42
Mean S. Dev-
3.94
1.080
3.92
1.048
3.56
1.183
3.35
1.360
3.96
1.031
3.31
1.546
4.06
0.976
3.88
1.003
4.33
0.883
3.85
1.104
From the study findings on the statement “Electronic funds transfer is used to transfer money
directly from one bank account to another.”, 45.8% of the respondents agreed, 39.6% strongly
agreed, 10.4% were not sure, and 4.2% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 4.17 implies that
most of the respondents agreed with the statement. With the majority agreeing, it means that
Electronic Funds Transfer concerns the transfer of money from one bank account to another or
across various digital platforms such as mobile money.
On the statement “In Electronic Funds Transfer, the money is deposited to an account
electronically.”, 33.3% of the respondents agreed, 37.5% strongly agreed, 16.7% were not sure
10.4% disagreed and 2.1 strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.94 implies that most of the
respondents agreed with the statement. This means that with Electronic Funds Transfer, there
is no handling of physical cash. All the transactions are made electronically using digital
exchange.
On the statement “Electronic Funds Transfer provides the capability to automate payments and
streamline cash flow.”, 39.6% of the respondents agreed, 33.3% strongly agreed, 14.6% were
not sure, 10.4% disagreed, and 8.3 strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.92 implies that most
of the respondents agreed with the statement. This means that, with Electronic Funds Transfer,
a person can schedule payments in a particular interval that is to say, weekly or monthly which
eases the payment of utility bills.
On the statement “Electronic Funds Transfer eliminates the risks associated with lost, stolen,
or misdirected checks.”, 41.7% of the respondents agreed, 20.8% strongly agreed, 18.8% were
not sure, 10.4% disagreed, and 8.3 strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.56 implies that most
of the respondents agreed with the statement. Gikandi and Bloor (2010) emphasize that, with
EFT, you save yourself and your company valuable time. EFT eliminates excess paper and
helps you automate the office payments.
On the statement “There is no way to reverse a transaction under the Electronic Funds Transfer
method.”, 18.8% of the respondents agreed, 29.2% strongly agreed, 18.8% were not sure 25.0%
disagreed and 8.3 strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.35 implies that most of the respondents
were not sure about the statement. Since the majority of the respondents were not sure about
this statement. It means that the respondents were divided. Some were saying that the
43
transactions can be reversed in case of a mistake whereas others were saying that, the
transactions cannot be revered.
On the statement “Hackers can try to steal customer’s money and information electronically.”,
41.7% of the respondents agreed, 33.3% strongly agreed, 16.7% were not sure, 4.2% disagreed
and strongly disagreed respectively. A mean score of 3.96 implies that most of the respondents
agreed with the statement. As stated by Gikandi and Bloor (2010), hackers can use the
information obtained from EFT platforms to steal one’s identity. This could mean a lot of
trouble for the customer that can take years to fix. One’s credit accounts are opened in his or
her name it can be many years before the debts are taken care of and removed off of their credit
report.
On the statement “Companies that receive Electronic Funds Transfer payments from customers
enjoy cash-flow advantages.”, 33.3% of the respondents agreed, 27.1% strongly agreed, 6.3%
were not sure, 10.4% disagreed, and 22.9% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.31 implies
that most of the respondents were uncertain about the statement. Companies that use Electronic
Funds Transfer payments enjoy cash flow advantages because the money is deposited directly
to their bank accounts which eliminates theft that would arise when physical cash is involved.
On the statement “Utility companies are among the first businesses to begin using Electronic
Funds Transfer on a large-scale basis.”, 43.8% of the respondents agreed, 37.5% strongly
agreed, 6.3% were not sure and 12.5% disagreed. A mean score of 4.06 implies that most of
the respondents agreed with the statement. Since the majority agreed, it implies that utility
companies such as Umeme were the first to adopt Electronic Funds Transfer to ease bill
payment, reduce corruption, bribery, and extortion.
On the statement “Electronic Funds Transfer debits and credits are usually less expensive
because they incur a flat fee per transaction.”, 52.1% of the respondents agreed, 25.0% strongly
agreed, 12.5% were not sure 6.3% disagreed and 4.2% strongly disagreed. A mean score of
3.88 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the statement. As stated by Sadler (2017),
EFT debits and credits are usually less expensive because they incur a flat fee per transaction
instead of a percentage of each transaction amount. Bank accounts don’t have expiration dates
like credit cards do; and people rarely switch banks, so there’s less risk of bounced EFT
transactions.
44
On the statement “Using Electronic Funds Transfer is an alternative to mailing and processing
hundreds of checks.”, 35.4% of the respondents agreed, 52.1% strongly agreed, 8.3% were not
sure, 2.1% disagreed and strongly disagreed respectively. A mean score of 4.33 implies that
most of the respondents agreed with the statement. This implies that EFT helps to reducing
paper checks and receipts as these are issued electronically.
Respondents generally agreed to a moderate degree that Electronic Funds Transfer influences
revenue collection with an overall mean score of 3.85. An overall standard deviation of 1.104
means that there was no consensus in the responses. This generally means that the use of
Electronic Funds Transfer influences revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch.
4.2.3.1 Correlation between Electronic Funds Transfer and revenue collection
To determine the relationship between E-Funds Transfer and revenue collection, the researcher
carried out a correlation test. The results are presented in the table below;
Table 18: Showing Pearson correlation between E-Funds Transfer and revenue collection
Electronic Funds
Transfer
Revenue Collection
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Electronic Funds
Transfer
1
48
.784**
.000
48
Revenue
Collection
.784**
-
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table 18 above shows the relationship between Electronic Funds Transfer (independent
variable) and revenue collection (dependent variable). It shows that, the correlation between
Electronic Funds Transfer and revenue collection is r = 0.784. This implies that there is a
significant (0.000) positive relationship between Electronic Funds Transfer and revenue
collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. It also means that Electronic Funds Transfer
influences revenue collection by a magnitude of 78.4%. The remaining 21.6% is influenced by
other strategies. The positive value of (r) means that an increase in the use of Electronic Funds
Transfer leads to a corresponding increase in revenue collection and vice versa.
45
4.3.2 Regression test
To determine the effect of Electronic Funds Transfer on revenue collection, the researcher
carried out a linear regression test. The results are presented in the tables below;
Table 19: Showing model summary for E-Funds Transfer and revenue collection
Model
1
R
.784
a
R Square
.614
Adjusted R Square
.606
Std. Error of the
Estimate
.310
a. Predictors: (Constant), E-Funds Transfer
Table 19 above shows R, R Square, and Adjusted R Square values. R represents Pearson’s
correlation coefficient which is 0.784, indicating a moderate degree of correlation. R Square is
the coefficient of determination which shows the proportion of the variance in the dependent
variable that is predictable from the independent variable. Adjusted R Square is the modified
version of R-square that measures how much of the variation in revenue collection is explained
by the variations in Electronic Funds Transfer. In this case, 60.6% (adjusted R square of 0.606)
reveals that the sample reflected 60.6% of the phenomenon in the population, the remaining
39.4% of the phenomenon being contributed by other strategies.
Table 20: Showing ANOVA values for E-Funds Transfer and revenue collection
Model
1
Regression
Residual
Total
Sum of Squares-
df
Mean Square-
.096
47
F
73.302
Sig.
.000b
a. Dependent Variable: Revenue Collection
b. Predictors: (Constant), E-Funds Transfer
The ANOVA table above is used to test the null hypothesis. The value of the calculated F is
21.288 for the variance generated by the regression. By comparing the values of F, it results
that it is compulsory to accept the alternative hypothesis (E-Funds Transfer has a significant
effect on revenue collection at Umeme _Nakulabye branch), meaning that not all regression
coefficients are equal to zero. This means that a significant influence of the regression model
occurs over the dependent variable.
46
Table 21: Regression coefficients for E-Funds Transfer and revenue collection
Model
1
(Constant)
E-Funds Transfer
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Beta
.776
.368
.814
.095
.784
t-
Sig.
.041
.000
a. Dependent Variable: Revenue Collection
The beta value of 0.786 reveals that Electronic Funds Transfer explained 78.6% of the variance
in the dependent variable (revenue collection at Umeme Nakulabye branch), the remaining
39.4% is explained by other strategies. The regression coefficient r =.000 was significant
implying that if Umeme wants to improve its revenue collection, then, it can manipulate
Electronic Funds Transfer as a strategy to realize its objective.
4.3 Revenue collection (Dependent Variable)
The researcher wanted to find out the effect of electronic payment on revenue collection in the
form of prepaid fees (Yaka), Postpaid bills, and Connection/reconnection fees. The results are
presented as follows;
4.3.1 Prepaid fees
The aim was to evaluate prepaid fees at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. Respondents were
provided with several statements and asked to indicate to what extent they agreed with them
using the scale: 1 point = strongly disagree; 2 points = disagree; 3 points = not sure; 4 points =
agree, and 5 points = strongly agree. A standard deviation greater than 1 implies a significant
variance meaning that there was no consensus in the responses while a standard deviation of
less than 1 shows that there wasn’t significant variance hence consensus in the responses.
47
Table 22: Descriptive Statistics for prepaid fees
Statement
As a prepaid customer uses
electricity, Umeme
deducts what the customer
owes from the account.
The customer monitors
and replenishes the
account to make sure the
money in the account does
not run out as electricity is
used.
There is no limit to the
number of times a
consumer may have to pay
for prepaid service for a
month.
Prepaid service is risky as
prices can change
frequently and keeping a
constant supply of
electricity is a challenge.
Shopping for prepaid
electricity is more
complicated than shopping
for postpaid electricity.
The differences in prices
and the fees profoundly
affect the total cost of
electricity to the consumer.
Overall Average
Source: Primary data -2020
1
0
2
2
3
2
4
19
5
25
0%
4.2%
4.2%
39.6%
52.1%
2
4
9
15
18
4.2%
8.3%
18.8%
31.1%
37.5%
1
3
9
21
14
2.1%
6.3%
18.8%
43.8%
29.2%
0
7
10
17
14
0%
14.6%
20.8%
35.4%
29.2%
2
2
10
15
19
4.2%
4.2%
20.8%
31.1%
39.6%
3
3
13
21
8
6.3%
6.3%
27.1%
43.8%
16.7%
Mean S. Dev.
4.40
.765
3.90
1.134
3.92
.964
3.79
1.031
3.98
1.082
3.58
1.048
3.93
1.004
On the statement “As a prepaid customer uses electricity, Umeme deducts what the customer
owes from the account.”, 39.6% of the respondents agreed, 52.1% strongly agreed, 4.2% were
not sure disagreed respectively. A mean score of 4.40 implies that most of the respondents
agreed with the statement. Since the majority agreed with this statement, it implies that Umeme
charges for electricity depending on the manner it is being consumed by the client. The more
the consumption, the higher the bill.
48
On the statement “The customer monitors and replenishes the account to make sure the money
in the account does not run out as electricity is used.”, 31.3% of the respondents agreed, 37.5%
strongly agreed, 18.8% were uncertain, 8.3% disagreed and 4.2% strongly disagreed. A mean
score of 3.90 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the statement. This implies that
if money runs out of the account, power is automatically disconnected.
On the statement “There is no limit to the number of times a consumer may have to pay for
prepaid service for a month.”, 43.8% of the respondents agreed, 29.2% strongly agreed, 18.8%
were uncertain, 6.3% disagreed and 2.1% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.92 implies
that most of the respondents agreed with the statement. This means that a customer can buy
power as many times as he/she wishes.
On the statement “Prepaid service is risky as prices can change frequently and keeping a
constant supply of electricity is a challenge.”, 35.9% of the respondents agreed, 29.2% strongly
agreed, 20.7% were uncertain and 14.6% disagreed. A mean score of 3.79 implies that most of
the respondents agreed with the statement. This means that, customers need to always budget
from electricity to avoid being disconnected from the service.
On the statement “Shopping for prepaid electricity is more complicated than shopping for
postpaid electricity.”, 31.3% of the respondents agreed, 39.6% strongly agreed, 20.8% were
not sure, 4.2% disagreed and strongly disagreed respectively. A mean score of 3.98 implies
that most of the respondents agreed with the statement. What makes it complicated is the
automatic disconnection of power in case of failure to pay. This is because payment is affected
before consumption.
On the statement “The differences in prices and the fees profoundly affect the total cost of
electricity to the consumer.”, 43.8% of the respondents agreed, 16.7% strongly agreed, 27.1%
were not sure, and 6.3% disagreed and strongly disagreed respectively. A mean score of 3.58
implies that most of the respondents agreed with the statement. This means that prepaid
electricity is more expensive as compared to postpaid because it involves more charges such
as electronic transfer fees.
49
4.3.2 Postpaid bills
The aim was to evaluate postpaid bills at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. Respondents were given
statements and asked to indicate to what extent they agreed with them, using the scale: 1 point
= strongly disagree; 2 points = disagree; 3 points = not sure; 4 points = agree, and 5 points =
strongly agree. A standard deviation greater than 1 implies a significant variance meaning there
was no consensus in the responses while a standard deviation of less than 1 shows that there
wasn’t significant variance hence consensus in the responses.
Table 23: Descriptive Statistics for Postpaid bills
Statement
Postpaid electricity payment
was the main form of
electricity bill payment
initially.
Postpaid electricity bill
payment uses an electricity
meter which counts and
accumulates the units
consumed by the end of the
one month.
A Postpaid bill is sent to the
customer’s address in time
before disconnection is
carried out.
With a Postpaid bill
payment, one does not need
to worry about a reduction in
the number of units.
You can always pay your
postpaid electricity bill via
the mobile money transfer
service
It's very easy for someone to
tamper with the meter in
your absence and Postpaid
meters take much time to get
repaired in case of damage.
Overall Average
Source: Primary data -2020
1
3
2
1
3
4
4
18
5
22
6.3%
2.1%
8.3%
37.5%
45.8%
2
1
12
18
15
4.2%
2.1%
25.0%
37.5%
31.3%
2
5
2
22
17
4.2%
10.4%
4.2%
45.8%
35.4%
3
6
6
20
13
6.3%
12.5%
12.5%
41.7%
27.1%
5
0
8
17
18
10.4%
0%
16.7%
35.4%
37.5%
2
3
8
20
15
4.2%
6.3%
16.7%
41.7%
31.3%
50
Mean S. Dev-
3.90
1.016
3.98
1.101
3.71
1.184
3.90
1.225
3.90
1.057
3.92
1.112
The study findings on the statement “Postpaid electricity payment was the main form of
electricity bill payment initially.”, 37.5% of the respondents agreed, 45.8% strongly agreed,
8.3% were not sure, 2.1% disagreed and 6.3% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 4.15 implies
that most of the respondents agreed with the statement. This implies that postpaid bill payment
was the only bill payment platform before the invention of electronic payment.
On the statement “Postpaid electricity bill payment uses an electricity meter which counts and
accumulates the units consumed by the end of the one month.”, 37.5% of the respondents
agreed, 31.3% strongly agreed, 25.0% were not sure, 2.1% disagreed, and 4.2 strongly
disagreed. A mean score of 3.90 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the statement.
On the statement “A Postpaid bill is sent to the customer’s address in time before disconnection
is carried out.”, 45.8% of the respondents agreed, 35.4% strongly agreed, 4.2% were not sure,
10.4% disagreed, and 4.2% strongly agreed. A mean score of 3.98 implies that most of the
respondents agreed with the statement. This means that with postpaid bill payment, a customer
is given some time to clear the bill before disconnection is done unlike prepaid payment where
the disconnection is automatically done.
On the statement “With a Postpaid bill payment, one does not need to worry about a reduction
in the number of units.”, 41.7% of the respondents agreed, 27.1% strongly agreed, 2.5% were
not sure, 2.5% disagreed, and 6.3 strongly agreed. A mean score of 3.71 implies that most of
the respondents agreed with the statement. A customer doesn’t need to worry about the number
of units because he/she is given sufficient time to pay and the disconnection is not automatic.
The disconnection is always done after presenting a disconnection order.
On the statement “You can always pay your postpaid electricity bill via the mobile money
transfer service”, 35.4% of the respondents agreed, 37.5% strongly agreed, 16.7% were not
sure, and 10.4% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.90 implies that most of the respondents
agreed with the statement. This means that Mobile Money is now the most convenient way of
paying utility bills.
On the statement “It's very easy for someone to tamper with the meter in your absence and
Post-paid meters take much time to get repaired in case of damage.”, 41.7% of the respondents
agreed, 31.3% strongly agreed, 16.7% were not sure, 6.3% disagreed and 4.2% strongly
disagreed. Prepaid meters are always placed outside the building in the meter box which makes
51
it prone to tampering and damage unlike postpaid meters which are always placed on top of
the electricity pole.
4.3.3 Connection/Reconnection fees
The aim was to evaluate connection/reconnection fees at Umeme -Nakulabye branch.
Respondents were also provided with several statements and asked to indicate the extent they
agreed with each of them, using the scale: 1 point = strongly disagree; 2 points = disagree; 3
points = not sure; 4 points = agree, and 5 points = strongly agree. A standard deviation greater
than 1 implies a significant variance meaning there was no consensus in the responses while a
standard deviation of less than 1 shows that there wasn't significant variance hence consensus
in responses.
Table 24: Descriptive Statistics for connection/reconnection fees
Statement
Sixty percent of Ugandans
wishing to access
electricity shy away
because of high connection
charges.
The average cost of an
electricity pole is
Shs800,000.
Settlement patterns affect
operational and connection
costs.
30 percent of Ugandans
access electricity.
The cost of connection
remains relatively high
along with illegal
connections and tariffs
based on meter bypasses.
Lack of access to
electricity increases
security risks at night and
constrains small business
activity/options.
Overall Average
Source: Primary data -2020
1
8
2
1
3
5
4
19
5
15
16.7%
2.1%
10.4%
39.6%
31.3%
0
3
5
20
20
0%
6.3%
10.4%
41.7%
41.7%
2
7
8
20
9
4.3%
14.6%
16.7%
41.7%
18.8%
2
2
6
20
1
4.3%
1
12.5%
7
2.1%
2.1%
3
6.3%
4.3%
Mean S. Dev-
4.12
1.044
3.48
1.203
18
4.04
1.031
41.7%
20
37.5%
19
4.15
.899
14.6%
41.7%
39.6%
5
6
19
15
3.79
1.184
10.4%
12.5%
39.6%
31.3%
3.88
1125
52
On the statement “Sixty percent of Ugandans wishing to access electricity shy away because
of high connection charges.”, 39.6% of the respondents agreed, 31.3% strongly agreed, 10.4%
were not sure, and 16.7% disagreed. A mean score of 3.67 implies that most of the respondents
agreed with the statement. This means that most Ugandans are not connected to electricity
because of the high connection charges. This has been partly solved by the Rural
Electrification Program of the government of Uganda.
On the statement “The average cost of an electricity pole is Shs800,000.”, 41.7% of the
respondents agreed, 41.7% strongly agreed, 10.4% were not sure, and 6.3% disagreed. A mean
score of 4.12 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the statement. This means that
the cost of an electric pole is too high thus, the government needs to provide free poles or
reduce the amount to make it affordable to an ordinary Ugandan.
On the statement “Settlement patterns affect operational and connection costs.”, 41.7% of the
respondents agreed, 18.8% strongly agreed, 16.7% were not sure, 14.6% disagreed and 8.3%
strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.48 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the
statement.
On the statement “30 percent of Ugandans access electricity.”, 41.7% of the respondents
agreed, 37.5% strongly agreed, 12.5% were not sure, 4.2% disagreed and strongly disagreed
respectively. A mean score of 4.04 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the
statement. This implies that, a small percentage of Ugandan use electricity which increases
deforestation as people cut down trees to get fuel in the form of firewood and charcoal.
On the statement “The cost of connection remains relatively high along with illegal
connections and tariffs based on meter bypasses.”, 41.7% of the respondents agreed, 39.6%
strongly agreed, 4.6% were not sure, 2.1% disagreed and strongly disagreed respectively. A
mean score of 4.15 implies that most of the respondents agreed with the statement. This means
Umeme makes a lot of losses because of illegal connections and meter bypasses.
On the statement “Lack of access to electricity increases security risks at night and constrains
small business activity/options.”, 39.6% of the respondents agreed, 31.3% strongly agreed,
2.5% were not sure, 10.4% disagreed and 6.3% strongly disagreed. A mean score of 3.79
implies that most of the respondents agreed with the statement. This means that electricity can
be improved if authorities install street lights on all major roads in the country.
53
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.0 Introduction
This chapter presents the summary of major findings, conclusions, and recommendations about
the study. The findings are discussed concerning the study objectives, case study, and reviewed
literature. The summary gives an overview of the research from which conclusions and
recommendations are drawn.
5.1 Summary of the study findings
The summary is based on the study objectives which were; to determine the effect of Mobile
Moneys on revenue collection at Umeme, to examine the effect of PayWay on revenue
collection, and to determine the effect of Electronic Funds Transfer on revenue collection.
5.1.1 The effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection
The study obtained an overall mean of 3.59 and a standard deviation of 1.173 (table 7). The
overall mean of 3.59 implies that respondents agreed to a moderate degree that Mobile Money
affects revenue collection. Whereas an overall standard deviation of 1.173 means that, there
was no consensus in the responses. This means that the use of Mobile Money affects revenue
collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch.
Pearson’s correlation between Mobile Money and revenue collection (table 8) shows that there
is a weak positive relationship between the two variables with r = 0.386 and p = 0.007. This
means that Mobile Money influences revenue collection at Umeme Nakulabye branch by a
magnitude of 38.6%. The remaining 61.4% is influenced by other strategies. The positive value
of (r) means that an increased use of mobile money leads to a corresponding increase in revenue
collection and vice versa.
Concerning the adjusted R square value (table 9), Mobile Money contributes only 13.0% to
revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. The remaining 87.0% of revenue collection
is influenced by other strategies.
Table 10 shows that the regression model predicts the dependent variable significantly well.
There is a statistical significance of the regression model shown by F = 8.037 and P = 0.007.
Therefore, H0 which was stated as, “Mobile Money doesn’t affect revenue collection at Umeme
54
-Nakulabye branch”, was rejected and H1 which was stated as, “Mobile Money has an effect
on revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch”, was accepted.
Standardized Coefficients Beta is equal to 0.386 (table 11) implying that mobile money
explained 38.6% of the variance in revenue collection at Umeme. The remaining 61.4% is
explained by other strategies. The regression coefficient r =.007 was significant implying that
Umeme can manipulate mobile money as a strategy to improve its revenue collection.
5.1.2 The effect of PayWay on revenue collection
The researcher obtained an overall mean of 3.77 and a standard deviation of 1.148 (table 12).
The overall mean of 3.77 imply that respondents agreed that PayWay influence revenue
collection. Whereas an overall standard deviation of 1.148 means that, there was no consensus
in the responses. This means that PayWay influences the revenue collection at Umeme Nakulabye branch.
Pearson’s correlation between PayWay and revenue collection (table 13) shows that there is a
moderate positive relationship between the two variables with r = 0.533 and p = 0.000. This
means that the use of PayWay influences revenue collection by 53.3% at Umeme -Nakulabye
branch.
Concerning the adjusted R square value (table 14), PayWay contributes only 26.8% to revenue
collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. The remaining 73.2% of revenue collection is
influenced by other strategies.
Table 15 shows that the regression model predicts the dependent variable significantly well.
There is a statistical significance of the regression model shown by F=18.223 and P=0.000.
Therefore, H0 which was stated as, “PayWay doesn’t affect revenue collection at Umeme Nakulabye branch”, was rejected and H1 which was stated as “PayWay affects revenue
collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch”, was accepted.
Standardized coefficients Beta is equal to 0.533 (table 16) implying that the use of PayWay
explained 53.3% of the variance in revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. The
remaining 46.7% is explained by other strategies. The regression coefficient r =.000 was
significant implying that Umeme -Nakulabye branch can manipulate PayWay as a strategy to
improve its revenue collection.
55
5.1.3 The effect of Electronic Funds Transfer on revenue collection
The researcher obtained an overall mean of 3.85 and a standard deviation of 1.104 (table 17).
The overall mean of 3.85 implies that respondents agreed that Electronic Funds Transfer affects
revenue collection. Whereas an overall standard deviation of 1.104 means that, there was no
consensus in the responses. This means that the use of Electronic Funds Transfer affects
revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch.
Pearson’s correlation between Electronic Funds Transfer and revenue collection (table 18)
shows that there is a strong positive relationship between the two variables with r = 0.784 and
p = 0.000. This means that the use of Electronic Funds Transfer influences revenue collection
at Umeme -Nakulabye branch by 78.4%.
Concerning the adjusted R square value (table 19), Electronic Funds Transfer contributes
60.6% to revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch. The remaining 39.4% of revenue
collection is influenced by other strategies.
Table 20 shows that the regression model predicts the dependent variable significantly well.
There is a statistical significance of the regression model indicated by F=73.302 and P=0.000.
Therefore, H0 which was stated as, “Electronic Funds Transfer doesn’t affect revenue
collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch”, was rejected and H1 which was stated as, “Electronic
Funds Transfer affects revenue collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch”, was accepted.
Standardized Coefficients Beta is equal to 0.784 (table 21) implying that Electronic Funds
Transfer explained 78.6% of the variance revenue collection at Umeme Nakulabye branch.
The remaining 39.4% is explained by other strategies. The regression coefficient r =.000 was
significant implying that Umeme can manipulate Electronic Funds Transfer as a strategy to
improve its revenue collection.
5.2 Conclusions
Basing on the objectives of the study and the findings, the study makes the following
conclusions:
5.2.1 The effect of Mobile Money on revenue collection
The first research objective was stated as, “To determine the effect of Mobile Moneys on
revenue collection” and the first research question was stated as, “What is the effect of Mobile
56
Money on revenue collection?” The study concludes that; Mobile Moneys affects revenue
collection at Umeme -Nakulabye branch by 38.6%, basing on Pearson product-moment
correlation coefficient of r = 0.386. The positive value of (r) means that, an increase in the use
of Mobile Moneys increases revenue collection and vice-versa. Therefore, research objective
one was achieved and research question one was answered.
5.2.2 The effect of PayWay on revenue collection
The second research objective was stated as, “To examine the effect of PayWay on revenue
collection.” and the second research question was stated as, “What is the effect of PayWay on
revenue collection?” The study concludes that; PayWay affect revenue collection 53.3%,
basing on Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient of r = 0.533. The positive value of
(r) means that an increased use of PayWay increases revenue collection and vice-versa.
Therefore, research objective two was achieved, and research question two was answered.
5.2.3 The effect of Electronic Funds Transfer on revenue collection
The third research objective was stated as, “To determine the effect of Electronic Funds
Transfer on revenue collection” and the third research question was stated as, “What is the
effect of Electronic Funds Transfer on revenue collection?” The study concludes that;
Electronic Funds Transfer affects revenue collection by a magnitude of 78.4% basing on
Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient of r = 0.784. The positive value of (r) means
that an increased use of Electronic Funds Transfer increases revenue collection and vice-versa.
Therefore, research objective three was achieved, and research question three was answered.
5.3 Recommendations
The study makes the following recommendations:
The study recommends that, Umeme Uganda should review its revenue collection standards
and audit policies to ensure that all its branches are compelled by regulations to adopt epayment and ensure proper management of the revenue. There should be structured e-payment
adoption standards and structure in Umeme.
The physical collection of money from customers by some officers from Umeme should be
tightened to ensure that all departments adopt e-payments systems. There should be clear
regulations and policies governing the adoption of e-payments systems. The organization
57
should increase its public awareness campaigns to ensure that the consumers get the right
information about e-payment revenue collection.
The study embarked on collecting data from employees at Umeme -Nakulabye branch.
However, it isolated the specific basic revenue source, which limited the applicability of the
results to Umeme only. So other studies should be done to assess the effects of e-payment to
other organizations using it.
It was very difficult to obtain some study data due to the COVID-19 lockdown, the reluctance
and uncooperativeness of the respondents, who felt that they were being disturbed and would
even fail to explain some technical terms. The study, therefore, recommends that another study
should be conducted on the same variables by another researcher to avoid the limitation of
limited information.
Umeme uses developments for taxation purposes to avoid the creation of a separate and
burdensome tax regime. However, modifying systems after they have been finalized is costly
and should be avoided where possible. Umeme should co-operate with business initiatives to
create protocols for trade that facilitate electronic offers, delivery, payment, documentation,
and express views promptly to the bodies developing such protocols so that they can be
developed, considering the views of URA.
5.4 Areas for further research
The study specifically focused on the relationship between electronic payment and revenue
collection. However, there are more areas for further research in this perspective such as;
•
Electronic payment systems and the performance of utility companies
•
Electronic payment systems and illegal electricity connections
•
Electronic payment and extortion of customers by utility company official
58
REFERENCES
Abor, J. (2004). Technological Innovation and Banking in Ghana, An Evaluation of Customers'
Perspective. American Academy of Financial Management, 1(3), 338-356.
Baike, (2017). Third-Party online payment. Cited:-.
https://baike.baidu.com/
item/%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%89%E6%96%B9%E6%94%AF%E4%BB%98
Balunywa, W., Nangoli, S., Mugerwa, G. W. Teko, J. & Mayoka, K. G. (2014). An analysis of
fiscal decentralization as a strategy for improving revenue performance in Ugandan Local
governments. Journal of Research in International Business and Management, 4(2), 2836.
Bank of Uganda Annual Report-
Bank
of
Uganda,
(2017).
Payment
Systems,
available
online
at
https://www.bou.or.ug/bou/payment_systems/Current_Payment_Systems.html
Biedrzycki Carol, (2013). Consumers beware prepaid electricity plans and fees, Texas
Ratepayers’ Organization to Save Energy
Dave Chaffey, (2011). E-business & E-commerce management-strategy, implementation, and
Practice Fifth edition.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of
information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-340.
Duffy G. and Dale B.G. (2008), E-commerce processes: A study of criticality, Industrial
Management & Data Systems, Vol. 102 Iss: 8 pp. 432 – 441
ERA (2009) Electricity Sector Performance Report, Electricity Regulatory Authority,
Kampala
ERA (2011) Study On Distribution System Losses and Collection Rates by UMEME Ltd, Final
Report by Parsons Brinckerhoff Africa Electricity Regulatory Authority, Kampala
Gikandi JW, Bloor C (2010). Adoption and Effectiveness of Electronic Banking in Kenya.
Elect. Commerce Res. Applications. 9(4):277–282.
59
Humphrey, D., M. Kim, and B.Vale. (2011). "Realizing the Gains from Electronic Payments:
Costs, Pricing, and Payment Choice." Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking. 33(2): 216–
234.
Kaburia, P. T. (2014). e-payment systems and alternatives for developing Countries.
Unpublished MSc Thesis. Nairobi: University of Nairobi.
Kamenju Denis, (2016). Advantages and disadvantages of postpaid and prepaid forms of
electricity payment in Uganda, http://energyglobalinternational.blogspot.ug/2014/12/
advantages-and-disadvantages-of.html
Knorr, M. (2008). “Payment Systems Convergence.” Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems.
3: 6–16.
Kuttner, K., and J. McAndrews. (2012). “Personal On-Line Payments.” Federal Reserve Bank
of New York, Economic Policy. 7: 35–50.
Matsiko Andrew, (2018). Local Revenues in Uganda: From Conventional to Unconventional
(Smart) Revenue collection and Payments in Kampala City Authority; available online at
https://wc2018.ipsa.org/events/congress/wc2018/paper/local-revenues-ugandaconventional-unconventional-smart-revenue.
Miva,
(2011).
The
History
of
Ecommerce:
How
did
it
all
begin.
https://www.miva.com/blog/the-history-of-ecommerce-how-did-it-all-begin/
Muhumuza Mark Keith, (2016). URA opens up to mobile money for tax payments,
http://www.monitor.co.ug/Business/URA-opens-up-to-mobile-money-for-taxpayments/-mrdjjz/index.html
Mutua George, (2017). All about PayWay, http://payway.ug/company/
Namoit, A. J. (2012). The Expected Economic Impact of Devolution of Resources to the
Counties: Case Study of Turkana County in Kenya. Unpublished Master of Business
Administration Research, University Of Nairobi, Nairobi.
Ndiwalana, A and Popov, O (2008) Mobile Payments: A Comparison between Philippine and
Ugandan Contexts, Technical Paper, Makerere University Kampala
60
Ndunda, J. M., Ngahu, S. T. & Wanyoike, D. (2015). Analysis Of Factors Influencing Optimal
By County Governments In Kenya A Case Of Nakuru County. International Journal of
Economics, Commerce and Management, III(5),-.
Ngotho, J. & Kerongo, F. (2014). Determinants of in Developing Countries: Kenya’s Tax
collection Perspective. Journal of Management and Business Administration, 1(1).
available online at: www.writersbureau.net/journals/jmba/.
Okure, M (2008) EAC Strategy to Scale-Up Access to Modern Energy Services, Uganda
Country Report and Implementation Workplan, Arusha
Onyango, E. O. (2013). The Effect of Financial Development on Economic Growth in Kenya.
Unpublished Research, Nairobi: Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and
Technology/ Kenya School of Monetary Studies.
Pariwat, S., & Hataiseree, R. (2004). The Use of Cash, Cheques, and Electronic Payment
Services in Thailand; Changes and Challenges for Efficiency Enhancement. Payments
Systems Group, 73-87.
Plouffe Christopher R., Mark Vandenbosch, John Hulland, (2000), "Why smart cards have
failed: looking to consumer and merchant reactions to a new payment technology",
International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 18 Iss: 3 pp. 112 -123
Sadler Don, (2017). The Benefits of Electronic Funds Transfer,
available online at
https://www.allbusiness.com/the-benefits-of-electronic-funds-transfer-.html
accessed 11 April, 2018.
Ssettimba Ivan James, (2016). Mobile Money in Uganda, a presentation to Bank of Uganda,
14th -16th March, 2016.
UMEME Integrated Annual Report 2016
UMEME Integrated Report and Financial Statements 2018
Wahab, Y. A. (2012). The Adoption and Use of Electronic Payment Systems in Ghana. A Case
of E-Zwich in the Sunyani Municipality. Unpublished Commonwealth Executive Masters
in Business Administration Thesis. Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and
Technology
61
Wesonga Nelson, (2016). Connection fees hindering access to power, says the government,
Sunday Monitor, August 7, 2016; http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/Connectionfees-hindering-access-to-power--says-govt/-nrleq/index.html
Yolo,
(2015).
Advantages,
disadvantages,
https://www.douban.com/note/-/
62
and
situations
of
online
payment.
QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Respondent, I am a student at Ndejje University, pursuing a Bachelor’s Degree in
Procurement and Logistics Management. I am researching the topic “The role of e-payment in
revenue collection in Uganda; A Case of Umeme, Nakulabye Branch”. You have been
chosen to participate in this study and your opinions shall be strictly kept confidential and
information provided will be used strictly for academic purposes. You are therefore kindly
requested to provide the relevant information in good faith.
SECTION A: Background Information
(Tick the most appropriate)
1) Gender
(a) Male
(b) Female
2) Age
(a) Below 20 years
(b) 21-30 years
(c) 31-40 years
(d) Above 41 years
3) Highest level of education
(a) Certificate
(b) Diploma
(d) Masters
(e) PhD
(c) Degree
Others (Specify)………………………………………………………………………………
4) Department of work
(a) Finance Department
(b) Human Resource Management
(c) Administration & Management
(d) Operational Management
Others (Specify)………………………………………………………………………………...
5) Tenure of service in the organization
(a) Less than 1 year
(b) 1-4 years
(c) 4-8 years
(d) More than 8 years
63
SECTION B: E-PAYMENT (INDEPENDENT VARIABLE)
Use the scale below to respond to the statements in the table (Tick a box of your choice)
Scale; 1= Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Not sure, 4=Agree, 5= Strongly Agree
SN Statement
1 2 3 4 5
Mobile Money
1
Mobile money is efficient in reducing delivery time and transaction
costs.
2
Mobile money has helped in reducing financial exclusion.
3
Mobile money facilitates the effectiveness of monetary policy to the
extent that it improves financial inclusion.
4
The increased revenue collection rate of Umeme is partly attributable
to an increase in mobile money payments.
5
Mobile money has increased transaction speeds and reduced
outstanding credit times.
6
People use mobile money for clearance of taxes and other non-tax
revenues.
7
Mobile Money platform facilitates payment of utility bills, school
fees, medical bills, and pay-tv.
8
Mobile Money Banking promotes efficient and unconventional
revenue collection.
9
In Uganda, authorities are steadily adopting Mobile Money to collect
revenues from both dwellers and businesses
10 Mobile Money promotes convenience, and encourages direct
interactions and negotiations between revenues authorities and payers
PayWay
1
PayWay partly solved the problem of direct physical payment and
revenue collection by service providers.
2
PayWay solved the problem of high costs and inefficiencies in
revenue collection and payment systems.
3
PayWay helped to minimize illegal connections or unofficial service
provision which resulted in a loss of revenue.
4
Pay Way offers payment kiosks and mobile point of sale services.
5
Payway works on the self-service kiosk, the mobile Point of Sale, and
the web interface.
6
It is possible to pay for TV, phone airtime using PayWay.
7
PayWay improves the efficiency of payment and revenue collection
systems.
8
Umeme uses PayWay to help clients meet their obligations timely
and conveniently.
64
-
Umeme believes that PayWay enables the reduction of turnaround
time for the payments hence increased efficiency and profitability.
PayWay is a component of an integrated payment reform process.
E-Funds transfer
Electronic funds transfer is used to transfer money directly from one
bank account to another.
In electronic Funds Transfer, the money is deposited to an account
electronically.
Electronic Funds Transfer provides the capability to automate
payments and streamline cash flow.
Electronic Funds Transfer eliminates the risks associated with lost,
stolen, or misdirected checks.
There is no way to reverse a transaction under the Electronic Funds
Transfer method.
Hackers can try to steal customer’s money and information
electronically.
Companies that receive Electronic Funds Transfer payments from
customers enjoy cash-flow advantages.
Utility companies are among the first businesses to begin using
Electronic Funds Transfer on a large-scale basis
Electronic Funds Transfer debits and credits are usually less
expensive because they incur a flat fee per transaction.
Using Electronic Funds Transfer is an alternative to mailing and
processing hundreds of checks.
SECTION C: REVENUE COLLECTION (DEPENDENT VARIABLE)
Use the scale below to respond to the statements in the table (Tick a box of your choice)
Scale; 1= Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Not sure, 4=Agree, 5= Strongly Agree
SN Statement
1 2 3 4 5
Prepaid fees (Yaka)
1
As a prepaid customer uses electricity, Umeme deducts what the
customer owes from the account.
2
The customer monitors and replenishes the account to make sure the
money in the account does not run out as electricity is used.
3
There is no limit to the number of times a consumer may have to pay
for prepaid service for a month.
4
Prepaid service is risky as prices can change frequently and keeping
a constant supply of electricity is a challenge.
5
Shopping for prepaid electricity is more complicated than shopping
for postpaid electricity.
65
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
The differences in prices and the fees profoundly affect the total cost
of electricity to the consumer.
Postpaid bills
Postpaid electricity payment was the main form of electricity bill
payment initially.
Postpaid electricity bill payment uses an electricity meter which
counts and accumulates the units consumed by the end of the one
month.
A Postpaid bill is sent to the customer’s address in time before
disconnection is carried out.
With a Postpaid bill payment, one does not need to worry about a
reduction in the number of units.
You can always pay your postpaid electricity bill via the mobile
money transfer service
It's very easy for someone to tamper with the meter in your absence
and Postpaid meters take much time to get repaired in case of damage.
Connection/Reconnection fees
Sixty percent of Ugandans wishing to access electricity shy away
because of high connection charges.
The average cost of an electricity pole is Shs800,000.
Settlement patterns affect operational and connection costs.
30 percent of Ugandans access electricity.
The cost of connection remains relatively high along with illegal
connections and tariffs based on meter bypasses.
Lack of access to electricity increases security risks at night and
constrains small business activity/options.
Thanks for your time
66