Example of journalistic writing
5/11/2020
Home
George Harrison Remembered: Within, Without | San Francisco Classical Voice
About
Donate
Log in | Register
Advertise
George Harrison Remembered: Within, Without
BY JONATHAN RHODES LEE
(/AUTHOR/JONATHAN-RHODES-LEE) ,
October 15, 2011
(/REVIEWS/GEORGE-HARRISON-REMEBERED-WITHINWITHOUT#DISQUS_THREAD)
0 COMMENTS
George Harrison: The quiet Beatle. The spiritual traveler. The
celebrity who, despite generous communication of his innermost
private thoughts, remained something of an enigmatic figure until
his very end. These are the impressions of Harrison that viewers
are likely to take away from Martin Scorsese’s new HBO
documentary, George Harrison: Living in the Material World.
The two-part, three-hour biographical film memorializes
Harrison’s adult life. His teenage introduction to John Lennon and
Paul McCartney serves as the earliest chronological point in the
film. The documentary’s first installment covers most of the
Beatles’ career, ending just after the production of the White
Album (1968). The second part begins by describing the tense final
period of the Beatles’ heyday, and goes on to remember Harrison’s
solo career, spiritual and social activities, and the mysteries of his
George Harrison: Living in the
Material World
private life. The documentary ends with his wife, Olivia, describing
a “profound experience” at the moment of Harrison’s death, using
terms that would surely have evoked one of the musician’s toothy smiles were he able to hear: “It was
visible. Let’s just say you wouldn’t need to light the room if you were trying to film it. He just ... He
just lit the room.”
Some viewers will dislike Scorsese’s approach. On one hand, die-hard Beatles fans won’t learn
anything new during the first two hours of the documentary, which doesn’t even try to uncover untold
anecdotes about the band’s rise to stardom or the heady days of the mid-60s. Nor is Harrison’s
perspective particularly foregrounded; much of the early story is told with Lennon as its star (as in
https://www.sfcv.org/reviews/george-harrison-remebered-within-without
1/3
5/11/2020
George Harrison Remembered: Within, Without | San Francisco Classical Voice
many Beatles documentaries), with Harrison defined more by his relationship to him and McCartney
than by anything directly focused on the documentary’s subject.
On the other hand, audiences with only a casual acquaintance with Beatles history may find the film
perplexing. There is no voiceover narration to hold all the elements together in an easily digestible
form. When Scorsese provides captions for interviewees, he gives only their names. George Martin,
for instance, speaks charmingly about the genesis of Within You, Without You with no real
clarification of his role in the group’s career. Phil Spector remembers having his spiritual eyebrows
raised by Harrison’s Hare Krishna Mantra record before the words “producer” or “Wall of Sound”
are uttered on the soundtrack. And Sir John Stewart (“the Flying Scotsman) offers touching
remembrances about Harrison’s state of mind after being stabbed during a 1999 home invasion
without really clarifying his own relationship with the musician, or the musician’s interest in car
racing. Other interviewees, like Neil Aspinall and Joan Taylor, will be names recognizable only to the
most Beatles-literate viewers.
Scorsese sets the tone for this opaque approach from his very opening shots. Over footage that
Harrison himself filmed, disembodied and unidentified voices bid him farewell, urging him to go on
to the afterlife. Brief shots follow, in which unnamed interviewees are asked what they would like to
say to Harrison if he could hear them. The subjects are not terribly difficult to identify (Eric Clapton,
Terry Gilliam, Dhani Harrison, and Ray Cooper), but younger viewers or people without extensive
exposure to popular culture may be perplexed right from the start.
Still, there is something beautiful, personal, and intimate in this enigmatic approach. As the
documentary moves on, the focus becomes increasingly about what Harrison referred to as “the Art of
Dying.” Scorsese tries to tap into the nonlinear, cyclic nature of Harrison’s philosophy, thinking, and
use of language. Music from the later parts of Harrison’s career accompany some parts of the film,
often connected to the historical narrative. As Tom Petty discusses Roy Orbison’s death, images of a
very young George Harrison subtly remind the viewer that Harrison’s great success as a cultural icon
was nothing less than an adolescent’s dream come true. And the home movies that raise the curtain
on the documentary recur as the final, haunting images of the second half.
It is in its personal, elegiac moments of remembrance that Scorsese’s film is at its best, and where
something deeply meaningful comes from the mouths of the interviewees. Archival footage of
Harrison speaking lovingly of LSD is followed immediately with him remembering the HaightAshbury as “just a lot of bums,” which sent him running away from drugs as a source for
enlightenment, and deeper into meditative practices. Scorsese juxtaposes this moment of
disillusionment with Harrison’s discussion of first thinking of Eastern meditation while experiencing
chemical enlightenment. The technique is one that carefully, in a nonjudgmental manner, chronicles
the inherent messiness of Harrison’s discovery of what he thought of as the central, most important
aspect of his life.
https://www.sfcv.org/reviews/george-harrison-remebered-within-without
2/3
5/11/2020
George Harrison Remembered: Within, Without | San Francisco Classical Voice
The other interviewees also offer tantalizing memories of Harrison that will be new to most viewers,
although Scorsese cannily avoids making their intimate portraits of the musician too clear. Both
Harrison’s former wives and the guru Mukundu Goswami speak hauntingly of the musician’s anger,
without ever quite clarifying what they mean. Harrison’s longtime friend Klaus Voorman talks about
Harrison “stepping back,” tantalizingly mentioning a period of deep personal trouble for the musician
in the mid-1970s, but the topic is not further explored. And when Olivia Harrison talks about George
lighting up the room at the moment of his death, nothing is pressed, no questions are asked. We are
left uncertain whether she is speaking metaphorically, or whether she believes herself to have
witnessed a sort of supernatural occurrence.
These ambiguities are at the heart of Living in the Material World. Scorsese’s film is like one of
Harrison’s metaphors — a weeping guitar, a wall of illusion — something pregnant with meaning yet
obtuse, obviously “in-the-know,” yet unwilling or incapable of imparting its knowledge without
encumbrance. The documentary is a fitting artistic encapsulation of a private man who lived in the
public’s gaze.
Jonathan Rhodes Lee (https://www.sfcv.org/author/jonathan-rhodes-lee) studied harpsichord
in New York, San Francisco, and the Netherlands. He is currently enrolled in the graduate program
in historical musicology at UC Berkeley.
0 Comments
San Francisco Classical Voice
Recommend
t Tweet
🔒
Jonathan Rhodes …
Sort by Best
f Share
Start the discussion…
Be the first to comment.
✉ Subscribe d Add Disqus to your siteAdd DisqusAdd
⚠ Do Not Sell My Data
https://www.sfcv.org/reviews/george-harrison-remebered-within-without
3/3