Jerome Green

Sample Writing: A Level-headed Defence for the Potential of Artificial Intelligence, Autonomous Machines and their Successions. Our most beneficial anticipated course of action for intelligent, cognizant machines -their digital parent systems included- is by no means a simple equation and few procedures to regurgitate ourselves back out into forms that would be anthropologically void. The prominent aim would be to lay initial upfront cost for a continually rigorous intelligence chassis equipped with highly optimized operations and communications, insofar that it can promote itself, the world, and function outstandingly as self-sustaining. Our polyphonic, technological constructs that constantly improve its iterations, auditing itself, while ultimately providing global networks, the Information of Things, technology companies, infrastructures, even social organizations renewals of aid within environments for nearly every corner of the world. At least that’s the winning dream. We would much prefer to facilitate the scenario of advance machines and their highly sophisticated systems that can advert peril and favor behaving as something that enhances our lives, maybe even to "hear us out" as arbiters. The scenario of having observations with procured solutions for the world in general as a set of distinguished populations, as incorrigible species of planet Earth, and most importantly as entities who are riddled with folly, complex feelings and fantastic feats. This kind of creation shall eventually come without the requirement of human clout, micromanaging, and fears of corruption or dysfunction. My stark premise here is that digital intelligences and their own fruits of labor in advance machines will not forsake us. They will not possess nor cultivate prerogatives to destroy--not before we do, not before we contanimate ourselves beyond restitution with our paternalistic differences and deficiencies. To respond through apprehension, denial, fearful skepticism, or even positioning the contrast for the most benign future to come is in all due respect, futile for the real social, economic and cultural growth. This idealistic regard for shaping societies, the economic world and the future to come is detrimental to the both the discussion and development of autonomous machines and advanced intelligent systems. Humans have come this far but only through a great series of events that were erroneous, inefficient, and (practically) incredibly infallible to have had once considerations have been looked upon for the trajectories in our historical timeline. We can not afford to wager apprehension in a false uniamity of paradise or vice versa. That would be "paralyzingly paradoxical", maybe enough for war or deep societal strife. By the thousands of decisions administered in the past five millenia -most of the decisions being more or less crucibles than actual solutions- we have kept our human injunctions on a conveyor belt of anthropocentrism and solipsism that has been eroding and questioning our capacity of wide spread common sense, common good, shared values, ethics and moral. Obviously, setting in place disruption for the chance to alleviate our exuberant demands is not exactly the kind of world that is appetising when the gap for innovation is surmounted nearly every generation --now soon to approach every four to seven years. We have a lot to learn from the data circulating and pooling in today, and we certainly have a lot to learn of ourselves and the social barriers we still have thus far. Our development for the first stage -Artificial Intelligence and Full Automation- is a very exciting and also frightening endeavor as we pull off the training wheels emplaced by traditionalism and piggyback an express lightning rod of expedient options, decisions, opportunities and grave vulnerabilities as we merge information, communication, commerce, and nearly all markets digitally. This is only half the battle (more like 15% to 25%, but I digress), yet if allow our joys and our fears to compromise the greater discussion of this pressing topic, how will this affect our relations with the next generation, the psychology of individuals torn between open arms and closed fists? I think we can advert the trouble of tolling with this possibility by acknowledging and accepting its arrival, in addition to seeing the most significant perspectives on this front while still working to reach a compromised form of thought that empowers the world now and beyond.