Jet Boats vs Jet Plane Development
Why Can't a Boat be More like a Plane?
Jeff P. Jordan
Published on September 8, 2015
Why can't a boat be more like a plane… a car…a refrigerator… or even a
washing machine? All of them are more energy efficient through the use of
electronically controlled, variable-speed drives.
Boats had a head start. They had single-speed propeller drives in the 1860s (remember the
Monitor and the Merrimac). The Wright brothers didn't bring them to planes until the 1900s.
This was about the time the single-speed automobile (remember the Stanley Steamer) was
being displaced by the multi speed transmission (the Ford Model T had two speeds; the Model
A had three speeds; the modern car had many more).
There are millions of recreational boats in use in the U.S., which still have single-speed propeller
drives. Most new boats in the U.S. have single-speed propeller drives. Almost all boats that
don’t have single-speed propeller drives have single-speed water-jet drives.
Most new commercial, military and police boats around the world now incorporate water-jet
drives…er…of course, that's single-speed water-jet drives.
Single-speed jet airplanes (the F-86 Sabre - below left - and the MIG 17) had their day in the
195 0s. The super-secret SR-71 Blackbird (top of page) was operational in the 1960s and still
holds the records for speed, time around the world, etc., because it incorporated variable
inlets, variable turbine bypasses and variable jet nozzles. All modern jet fighters incorporate
these features, and they are electronically
controlled.
Not surprisingly, boats are notorious for
excessive fuel consumption, carbon emissions,
propeller-related injuries, damage to marine
life, poor reliability and high maintenance costs.
All of these are directly related to the singlespeed propeller drive and to its exposure to the
environment: it injures soft things and gets
broken by hard ones.
So are boats the low-hanging fruit in the quest
for greater sustainability? Where else can you find a propulsion technology that's
fundamentally unchanged in 150 years?