PLoS ONE - Published meta-analysis
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Bevacizumab Combined with Chemotherapy
Improves Survival for Patients with
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from
Meta Analysis
Irena Ilic1☯*, Slobodan Jankovic2, Milena Ilic3☯
1 Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia, 2 Department of
Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia, 3 Department of
Epidemiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
☯ These authors contributed equally to this work.
*-
a11111
Abstract
Background
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Ilic I, Jankovic S, Ilic M (2016)
Bevacizumab Combined with Chemotherapy
Improves Survival for Patients with Metastatic
Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Meta Analysis.
PLoS ONE 11(8): e-. doi:10.1371/journal.
pone-
Editor: Yu-Jia Chang, Taipei Medical University
College of Medicine, TAIWAN
Received: March 13, 2016
Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths in both sexes in the world.
Improvement of existing therapy modalities and implementing new ones in order to improve
survival of patients with colorectal cancer represents a great challenge for medicine. The
aim of this paper was to assess the impact that adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy has
on survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, compared to the use of chemotherapy alone.
Methods
Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined from the studies and pooled. Two-sided p values were reported and considered to indicate statistical significance if less than 0.05.
Accepted: August 15, 2016
Published: August 31, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Ilic et al. This is an open access
article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are
credited.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
within the paper.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding
for this work.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
Results
A total of 12 studies that meet the inclusion criteria were identified in the literature search, 3
phase II studies and 9 phase III studies. Based on the random effects meta-analysis, a statistically significant improvement was identified for both overall survival (HR = 0.84; 95% CI:
0.74–0.94; p = 0.003) and progression free survival (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55–0.73;
p