CHAPTER FOUR
4.0
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
This chapter presents the results of data analysis and discussion of findings. Also, the results
are discussed in line with the findings of previous studies. This chapter is structured to contain
four sections which are presentation and analysis of demographic variable of respondents,
analysis of questionnaire items, and discussion of findings.
4.1 Demographic Variable of Respondents
The personal variables of respondents are analyzed and presented in this section. Data collected
on the personal data through the administration of the questionnaire were presented on table
4.1 to 4.4 followed by analysis of the items using simple percentage analysis.
Table 4.1 Distribution of Respondents by Gender
Frequency
Male
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
50
43.5
43.5
43.5
Female
65
Total
115
Source: Researchers Field Survey 2021
-
-
100.0
Valid
In table 4.1 above, 43.5% (50) of the total respondents were male while 56.5% (65) were
female. The result from the analysis is an indication that more female are included in the survey
than male. This implied that the study was not gender bias as both genders participated in the
study.
Table 4.2 Distribution of Respondents by Age
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
18-24 years
21
18.3
18.3
18.3
25-30 years
46
40.0
40.0
58.3
25
21.7
21.7
80.0
23
20.0
20.0
100.0
115
100.0
100
Valid
31-40 years
41 years
and above
Total
Source: Researchers Field Survey 2021
In table 4.2 above, shows the distribution of respondent by age. The analysis of the study
indicated that 18.3% (21) of the respondents are between 18-24years old, while 40% (46) of
the respondents are between 25-30 years old, 21.7% (25) of are between 31-40 years old, and
20% (23) of the respondents are between above 40 years old. This shows that majority of the
respondents are in the age grade of 25-30 years. This implied that the respondents in this study
in the working population.
Table 4.3 Distribution of Respondents by Educational Qualification
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
SSCE
38
33.0
33.0
33.0
NCE/OND/HND
BSC.
35
39
30.4
33.9
30.4
33.9
63.5
97.4
3
2.6
2.6
100.0
115
100.0
100
Others
Total
Source: Researchers Field Survey 2021
In table 4.3 above, shows the distribution of respondent by their educational qualification. The
analysis of the study indicated that 38% (33) of the respondents are SSCE holders, while 30.4%
(35) of the respondents are NCE/OND/HND are 72% (36) holders, 33.9% (39) of the
respondents are BSC. Holders, 2.6% (3) of the respondents have other certificate. The result
reveals that majority of the respondents in this study BSC holders. This implied that the
respondents in this study are educated.
Table 4.4 Distribution of Respondents by Managerial Level
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Top
Level
11
9.6
9.6
9.6
Middle
Level
45
39.1
39.1
48.7
Low
Level
59
51.3
51.3
100.0
Total
115
100
100
Source: Researchers Field Survey 2021
In table 4.4 above, shows the distribution of respondent by managerial level. The analysis of
the study indicated that 9.6% (11) of the respondents are top level manager, while 39.1% (45)
of the respondents are middle level manager, 51.3% (59) of the respondents are low level
manager. This implied that majority of the respondents in this are low level manager.
Table 4.5 Distribution of Respondents by Working Experience
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Below 10
years
85
73.9
73.9
73.9
11-20
years
28
24.3
24.3
98.3
2
1.7
1.7
100.0
115
100
100
Above 20
years
Total
Source: Researchers Field Survey 2021
In table 4.5 above, shows the distribution of respondent by their working experience. The
analysis of the study indicated that 73.9% (85) of the respondents have below 10 years of
working experience, while 24.3% (28) of the respondents have between 11-20 years of working
experience, 1.7% (2) of the respondents have above 20 years of working experience. This
implied that majority of the respondents in this have below 10 years of working experience.
4.2. Analysis of the Questionnaire Items
4.2.1 Items on Internal Control
Table 4.6: Our management considers the level of competence required of a particular duty or
work before assigning it to an employee
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Strongly Disagree
1
.9
.9
.9
Agree
3
2.6
2.6
3.5
Strongly Agree
111
96.5
96.5
100.0
Total
115
100.0
100.0
Source: Researchers Field Survey 2021
From table 4.6 above, it was shown that 96.5% (17) of the total respondents strongly agreed
that their management considers the level of competence required of a particular duty or work
before assigning it to an employee, while 2.6% (3) agreed and 0.9% (1) strongly disagreed.
This result indicated that majority of respondents strongly agreed that their management
considers the level of competence required of a particular duty or work before assigning it to
an employee.
Table 4.7: Our organization has a clear organizational chart showing lines of responsibility
Frequency
Valid
Strongly Disagree
7
Disagree
5
Undecided
12
Agree
39
Strongly Agree
52
Total
115
Source: Researchers Field Survey 2021
Percent
Valid Percent-
Cumulative
Percent-
From table 4.7 above, it was shown that 45.2% (52) of the total respondents strongly agreed
that their organization has a clear organizational chart showing lines of responsibility, while
33.9% (39) agreed, 10.4% (12) are undecided, 4.3% (5) disagree and 6.1% (7) strongly
disagreed. This result indicated that majority of respondents strongly agreed that their
organization has a clear organizational chart showing lines of responsibility.
4.2.2: Items on Accountability
Table 4.8: We have the ability to measure counter financial imbalances, and to stabilize credit
markets and financial system
Frequency
Valid
Strongly Disagree
6
Disagree
10
Undecided
12
Agree
37
Strongly Agree
50
Total
115
Source: Researchers Field Survey 2021
Percent
Valid Percent-
Cumulative
Percent-
From table 4.8 above, it was shown that 43.5% (37) of the total respondents strongly agreed
that their organization have the ability to measure counter financial imbalances, and to stabilize
credit markets and financial system, while 32.2% (37) agreed, 10.4% (12) are undecided, 8.7%
(10) disagree and 5.2% (6) strongly disagreed. This result indicated that majority of
respondents strongly agreed that their organization have the ability to measure counter financial
imbalances, and to stabilize credit markets and financial system.
Table 4.9: We have capabilities in our decision-making process to ensure good governance
and transparency
Frequency
Valid
Strongly Disagree
7
Disagree
6
Undecided
6
Agree
52
Strongly Agree
44
Total
115
Source: Researchers Field Survey 2021
Percent
Valid Percent-
Cumulative
Percent-
From table 4.9 above, it was shown that 38.3% (44) of the total respondents strongly agreed
that their organization have capabilities in our decision-making process to ensure good
governance and transparency, while 45.2% (52) agreed, 5.2% (6) are undecided, 5.2% (6)
disagree and 6.1% (7) strongly disagreed. This result indicated that majority of respondents
agreed that organization have capabilities in our decision-making process to ensure good
governance and transparency.
4.2.3: Items Management of Financial Institution
Table 4.10: Our organization periodically forecasts year-end revenues and expenses to assist
in making sound management decisions.
Frequency
Valid
Strongly Disagree
6
Disagree
6
Undecided
6
Agree
42
Strongly Agree
55
Total
115
Source: Researchers Field Survey 2021
Percent
Valid Percent-
Cumulative
Percent-
From table 4.10 above, it was shown that 47.8% (55) of the total respondents strongly agreed
that their organization periodically forecasts year-end revenues and expenses to assist in
making sound management decisions, while 36.5% (42) agreed, 5.2% (6) are undecided, 5.2%
(6) disagree and 5.2% (7) strongly disagreed. This result indicated that majority of respondents
strongly agreed that their organization periodically forecasts year-end revenues and expenses
to assist in making sound management decisions.
4.3 Hypotheses Testing
This study formulated two hypotheses. The hypotheses were analyzed using multiple
regression at 5% level of significance.
4.3.1 Hypothesis One: Effective internal control does not help in the management of
financial institution in Ago-iwoye, Ogun state.
Table 4.11
Model Summary
Model
R
R Square
a
1
.667
.445
a. Predictors: (Constant), Internal Control
Adjusted R Square
.440
ANOVAa
Model
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
1
Regression-
Residual-
.329
Total-
a. Dependent Variable: Management of Financial Institution
b. Predictors: (Constant), Internal Control
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
Model
B
Std. Error
Beta
1
(Constant)
.470
.487
Internal Control
1.041
.109
.667
a. Dependent Variable: Management of Financial Institution
Source: SPSS Output
Std. Error of the
Estimate
.57352
F
90.703
t
-
Sig.
.000b
Sig.
.336
.000
The result on the table 4.11 revealed the significant impact of internal control on management
of financial institution in Ago-iwoye, Ogun state. The result shows a coefficient and probability
value of β = 0.667, p < 0.05. The coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.445 indicated that,
44.5% of the variation or change in internal control is attributable to management of financial
institutions and the remaining 55.5% is due to other factors not captured in the model. The
coefficient value showed that, a change in internal control will lead to 0.667 (66.7%) change
on management of financial institution. This implies a strong relationship among the variables.
Thus, we reject the null hypothesis. As a result, this study concluded that internal control had
significant impact on management of financial institution in Ago-iwoye, Ogun state, Nigeria.
4.3.1 Hypothesis Two: Effective Accountability does not help in management of financial
institution in Ago-iwoye, Ogun state.
Table 4.12
Model Summary
Model
R
R Square
a
1
.706
.499
a. Predictors: (Constant), Accountability
Adjusted R Square
.494
ANOVAa
Model
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
1
Regression-
Residual-
.297
Total-
a. Dependent Variable: Management of Financial Institution
b. Predictors: (Constant), Accountability
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
Model
B
Std. Error
Beta
1
(Constant)
.068
.387
Accountability
.953
.090
.706
a. Dependent Variable: Management of Financial Institution
Source: SPSS Output
Std. Error of the
Estimate
.54521
F
112.409
Sig.
.000b
t
Sig.
.860
.000
-
The result on the table 4.12 revealed the significant impact of accountability on management
of financial institution in Ago-iwoye, Ogun state. The result shows a coefficient and probability
value of β = 0.706, p < 0.05. The coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.449 indicated that,
44.9% of the variation or change in accountability is attributable to management of financial
institutions and the remaining 55.1% is due to other factors not captured in the model. The
coefficient value showed that, a change in accountability control will lead to 0.706 (70.6%)
change on management of financial institution. This implies a strong relationship among the
variables. Thus, we reject the null hypothesis. As a result, this study concluded that
accountability had significant impact on management of financial institution in Ago-iwoye,
Ogun state, Nigeria.
4.4 Discussion of Findings
This study was designed to appraise the effect Internal Control System and Accountability of
Nigeria Financial Institution. This study was guided by two hypothesis which are to determine
the significant impact of internal control on management of financial institution in Ago-iwoye,
Ogun state, while also analyzing the revealed the significant impact of accountability on
management of financial institution in Ago-iwoye, Ogun state, Nigeria.
The analysis of the first hypothesis indicated that internal control had significant impact on
management of financial institution in Ago-iwoye, Ogun state, Nigeria. This support the claim
of Morelo (2011), that effective internal controls will help to protect an organization's assets
and assist in their proper management.
Analysis of the second hypothesis indicated that accountability had significant impact on
management of financial institution in Ago-iwoye, Ogun state, Nigeria. This support the claim
of Iwumenne (2008), that the sole of any business continuity. A mismanaged economy cannot
sustain her subjects. In the micro sense, a mismanaged firm is for failure. The main aim of
business is profit maximization.