Enoghase Itua Erasmus

APPENDIX III Computer Printout for Analysis DESCRIPTIVES VA DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=universities /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX /SORT=MEAN (A). Notes Output Created 26-MAR-2025 05:21:08 Comments Input Data C:\Users\ G.OBIZ\Documents\ Ofangbonmu,Unity.sav Active Dataset DataSet1 Filter Weight Split File N of Rows in Working Data File 202 Missing Value Handling User-defined missing values are treated as missing. Cases Used All non-missing data are used. Syntax DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=universities unit_division /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX /SORT=MEAN (A). Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00 Elapsed Time 00:00:00.00 Descriptive Statistics Descriptive Statistics for Universities Syntax: DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=universities /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX /SORT=MEAN (A). N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma 58 58 58.00 0.00 University of Benin, Benin City 123 123 123.00 0.00 Edo University, Uzairue 21 21 21.00 0.00 Total 202 202 67.33 53.14 Frequencies Frequency Distribution for Universities Syntax: DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=admin executive secretarial /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX /SORT=MEAN (A). Universities Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma 58 28.7 28.7 28.7 University of Benin, Benin City 123 60.9 60.9 89.6 Edo University, Uzairue 21 10.4 10.4 100.0 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 Descriptive Statistics for Administrative Units Syntax: DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=admin executive secretarial /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX /SORT=MEAN (A). N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Admin 128 128 128.00 0.00 Executive 31 31 31.00 0.00 Secretarial 43 43 43.00 0.00 Total 202 202 67.33 50.01 Frequency Distribution for Administrative Units Syntax: FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=admin executive secretarial /STATISTICS=STDDEV MEAN MEDIAN /ORDER=ANALYSIS. Unit/Division Admin Executive Secretarial Total Frequency- Percent- Valid Percent- Cumulative Percent- Descriptive Statistics for Gender Distribution Syntax: DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=male female /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX /SORT=MEAN (A). N Male Female Total Minimum- Maximum- Mean- Frequency Distribution for Gender Syntax: FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=male female /STATISTICS=STDDEV MEAN MEDIAN Std. Deviation- /ORDER=ANALYSIS. Sex Male Female Total Frequency- Percent- Valid Percent- Cumulative Percent- FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=AutocraticLeadership1 AutocraticLeadership2 AutocraticLeadership3 AutocraticLeadership4 AutocraticLeadership5 AutocraticLeadership6 DemocraticLeadership1 DemocraticLeadership2 DemocraticLeadership3 DemocraticLeadership4 DemocraticLeadership5 DemocraticLeadership6 BureaucraticLeadership1 BureaucraticLeadership2 BureaucraticLeadership3 BureaucraticLeadership4 BureaucraticLeadership5 BureaucraticLeadership6 /STATISTICS=STDDEV MEAN MEDIAN /ORDER=ANALYSIS. Frequencies Notes Output Created 26-MAR-2025 05:49:16 Comments Input Data Active Dataset DataSet1 Filter Weight Split File N of Rows in Working Data File 202 Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing Cases Used Statistics are based on all cases with valid data. Syntax FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=AutocraticLeadership1 AutocraticLeadership2 AutocraticLeadership3 AutocraticLeadership4 AutocraticLeadership5 AutocraticLeadership6 DemocraticLeadership1 DemocraticLeadership2 DemocraticLeadership3 DemocraticLeadership4 DemocraticLeadership5 DemocraticLeadership6 BureaucraticLeadership1 BureaucraticLeadership2 BureaucraticLeadership3 BureaucraticLeadership4 BureaucraticLeadership5 BureaucraticLeadership6 /STATISTICS=STDDEV MEAN MEDIAN /ORDER=ANALYSIS. Resources Processor Time Elapsed Time 00:00:00.03 [DataSet1] C:\Users\ G.OBIZ\Documents\ Ofangbonmu,Unity.sav Frequency Table My unit head makes decisions without consulting staff and it makes the working environment unhealthy Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 49 24.26 24.26 24.26 Agree 148 73.27 73.27 97.52 Disagree 3 1.49 1.49 99.01 Strongly Disagree 2 0.99 0.99 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 The head of my unit/division gives orders without explaining the reasons behind them and it makes staff perform poorly Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 36 17.82 17.82 17.82 Agree 157 77.72 77.72 95.54 Disagree 7 3.47 3.47 99.01 Strongly Disagree 2 0.99 0.99 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 The head of my unit/division expects staff to follow instructions strictly without questioning Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 41 20.30 20.30 20.30 Agree 143 70.79 70.79 91.09 Disagree 12 5.94 5.94 97.03 Strongly Disagree 6 2.97 2.97 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 My head of unit/division is too harsh/coercive and it affects my work performance Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 32 15.84 15.84 15.84 Agree 152 75.25 75.25 91.09 Disagree 14 6.93 6.93 98.02 Strongly Disagree 4 1.98 1.98 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 My head of unit/division controls all activities and decision-making, making staff not useful Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 45 22.28 22.28 22.28 Agree 140 69.31 69.31 91.58 Disagree 10 4.95 4.95 96.04 Strongly Disagree 7 3.47 3.47 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 I hate working under a coercive environment because it does not give room for work satisfaction/improvement Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 50 24.75 24.75 24.75 Agree 138 68.32 68.32 93.07 Disagree 9 4.46 4.46 97.52 Strongly Disagree 5 2.48 2.48 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 The head of my unit/division seeks input from staff before making major decisions Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 55 27.23 27.23 27.23 Agree 135 66.83 66.83 94.06 Disagree 7 3.47 3.47 97.52 Strongly Disagree 5 2.48 2.48 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 My unit/division head provides frequent and supportive communication, encourages teamwork and collaboration among staff Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 60 29.70 29.70 29.70 Agree 130 64.36 64.36 94.06 Disagree 6 2.97 2.97 97.03 Strongly Disagree 6 2.97 2.97 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 The head of my unit/division shares decision-making responsibilities with staff Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 52 25.74 25.74 25.74 Agree 140 69.31 69.31 95.05 Disagree 5 2.48 2.48 97.52 Strongly Disagree 5 2.48 2.48 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 The head of my unit/division supports and motivates staff to reach their potential Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 48 23.76 23.76 23.76 Agree 144 71.29 71.29 95.05 Disagree 6 2.97 2.97 98.02 Strongly Disagree 4 1.98 1.98 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 The head of my work division leads by example Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 53 26.24 26.24 26.24 Agree 137 67.82 67.82 94.06 Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 98.02 Strongly Disagree 4 1.98 1.98 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 The head of my division respects all staff and takes their constructive opinions into consideration Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 57 28.22 28.22 28.22 Agree 132 65.35 65.35 93.56 Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 97.52 Strongly Disagree 5 2.48 2.48 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 My unit head emphasizes adherence to official regulations and protocols Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 47 23.27 23.27 23.27 Agree 142 70.30 70.30 93.56 Disagree 9 4.46 4.46 98.02 Strongly Disagree 4 1.98 1.98 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 The head of my unit/division values the ideas and suggestions of staff members Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 50 24.75 24.75 24.75 Agree 136 67.33 67.33 92.08 Disagree 10 4.95 4.95 97.03 Strongly Disagree 6 2.97 2.97 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 My unit head relies heavily on official hierarchy and chain of command Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 46 22.77 22.77 22.77 Agree 140 69.31 69.31 92.08 Disagree 9 4.46 4.46 96.53 Strongly Disagree 7 3.47 3.47 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 My unit head gives orders and clarifies job procedures Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 51 25.25 25.25 25.25 Agree 138 68.32 68.32 93.56 Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 97.52 Strongly Disagree 5 2.48 2.48 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 My unit head focuses on maintaining control through detailed policies Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 49 24.26 24.26 24.26 Agree 134 66.34 66.34 90.59 Disagree 11 5.45 5.45 96.04 Strongly Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 My unit head focuses more on the needs and interests of the organization Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 54 26.73 26.73 26.73 Agree 130 64.36 64.36 91.09 Disagree 12 5.94 5.94 97.03 Strongly Disagree 6 2.97 2.97 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 FREQUENCIES VARIABLES= Anticipate Problems1 Quality Expectations Complete2Tasks Trusted Sensitive3 Issues Take Initiative4 Positive Attitude5 Positive Relationships6 Get Great Deal1 High Standards Work2 Efficiently3 Regular4 Punctual Manage Time5 Consistent Rules6 Sensitive To Others1 Effective2 With People3 Seeks Responsibility4 Organizes5 Inspires6 /STATISTICS=STDDEV MEAN MEDIAN /ORDER=ANALYSIS. Output Created 26-MAR-2025 06:19:54 Comments Input Data Active Dataset DataSet1 Filter Weight Split File N of Rows in Working Data File 202 Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing Cases Used Statistics are based on all cases with valid data. Syntax FREQUENCIES VARIABLES= Anticipate Problems1 Quality Expectations Complete2Tasks Trusted Sensitive3 Issues Take Initiative4 Positive Attitude5 Positive Relationships6 Get Great Deal1 High Standards Work2 Efficiently3 Regular4 Punctual Manage Time5 Consistent Rules6 Sensitive To Others1 Effective2 With People3 Seeks Responsibility4 Organizes5 Inspires6 /STATISTICS=STDDEV MEAN MEDIAN /ORDER=ANALYSIS. Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.05 Elapsed Time 00:00:00.05 [DataSet1] C:\Users\ G.OBIZ\Documents\ Ofangbonmu,Unity.sav I anticipate problems and develop solutions in advance Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 55 27.23 27.23 27.23 Agree 133 65.84 65.84 93.07 Disagree 10 4.95 4.95 98.02 Strongly Disagree 4 1.98 1.98 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 The quality of my work meets the expectations of my unit head Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 52 25.74 25.74 25.74 Agree 140 69.31 69.31 95.05 Disagree 6 2.97 2.97 98.02 Strongly Disagree 4 1.98 1.98 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 I complete assigned tasks within the stipulated deadlines Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 50 24.75 24.75 24.75 Agree 138 68.32 68.32 93.07 Disagree 9 4.46 4.46 97.52 Strongly Disagree 5 2.48 2.48 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 Trusted to handle sensitive issues and of good moral standing Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 53 26.24 26.24 26.24 Agree 135 66.83 66.83 93.07 Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 97.03 Strongly Disagree 6 2.97 2.97 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 I take initiative in my role without waiting for instructions Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 56 27.72 27.72 27.72 Agree 130 64.36 64.36 92.08 Disagree 9 4.46 4.46 96.53 Strongly Disagree 7 3.47 3.47 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 I consistently show a positive attitude towards my work Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 51 25.25 25.25 25.25 Agree 136 67.33 67.33 92.58 Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 96.53 Strongly Disagree 7 3.47 3.47 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 I maintain a positive working relationship with my colleagues Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 57 28.22 28.22 28.22 Agree 129 63.86 63.86 92.08 Disagree 10 4.95 4.95 97.03 Strongly Disagree 6 2.97 2.97 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 Get a great deal done within a set time Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 54 26.73 26.73 26.73 Agree 134 66.34 66.34 93.07 Disagree 9 4.46 4.46 97.52 Strongly Disagree 5 2.48 2.48 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 I maintain very high standards, highly proficient in practical application of professional knowledge, always cogent and clear, hardworking and loyal, work is virtually error-proof Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 48 23.76 23.76 23.76 Agree 140 69.31 69.31 93.07 Disagree 7 3.47 3.47 96.53 Strongly Disagree 7 3.47 3.47 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 I am able to work efficiently without constant supervision and perform competently under pressure Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 53 26.24 26.24 26.24 Agree 132 65.35 65.35 91.58 Disagree 10 4.95 4.95 96.53 Strongly Disagree 7 3.47 3.47 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 Regular and punctual at work Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 55 27.23 27.23 27.23 Agree 130 64.36 64.36 91.58 Disagree 9 4.46 4.46 96.04 Strongly Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 I can manage my time and work priorities effectively, comprehend instructions, directives, rules, and regulations Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 50 24.75 24.75 24.75 Agree 137 67.82 67.82 92.57 Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 96.53 Strongly Disagree 7 3.47 3.47 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 Consistent in the interpretation of rules Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 52 25.74 25.74 25.74 Agree 134 66.34 66.34 92.08 Disagree 7 3.47 3.47 95.54 Strongly Disagree 9 4.46 4.46 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 Sensitive to other people's feelings, tactful, and understanding of personal problems, and so I don’t transfer aggression Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 54 26.73 26.73 26.73 Agree 131 64.85 64.85 91.58 Disagree 9 4.46 4.46 96.04 Strongly Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 Exceptionally effective in dealing with people of all types Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 49 24.26 24.26 24.26 Agree 138 68.32 68.32 92.57 Disagree 7 3.47 3.47 96.04 Strongly Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 Seeks and accepts responsibility at all times Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 50 24.75 24.75 24.75 Agree 136 67.33 67.33 92.08 Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 96.04 Strongly Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 Organizes and inspires staff to give their best Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Strongly Agree 55 27.23 27.23 27.23 Agree 129 63.86 63.86 91.09 Disagree 10 4.95 4.95 96.04 Strongly Disagree 8 3.96 3.96 100.00 Total 202 100.0 100.0 100.0 FREQUENCIES VARIABLES /ORDER=ANALYSIS. /SAVEOUTFILE='C:\ErasmusItua\user\Documents\Ofangbonmu,Unity.data.sav’/COMPRESSED.MEANS TABLES= Leadership Styles_ Autocratic _Democratic_ Bureaucratic _Job Productivity /CELLS COUNT MEAN STDDEV. Descriptives [DataSet2] Descriptive Statistics Item N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation item1 202 1.00 4.00 3.21 0.80 item2 202 1.00 4.00 3.12 0.78 item3 202 1.00 4.00 3.08 0.77 item4 202 1.00 4.00 3.05 0.76 item5 202 1.00 4.00 3.10 0.78 item6 202 1.00 4.00 3.15 0.79 Valid N (listwise) 202 DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=item1 item2 item3 item4 item5 item 6 /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX. Descriptives [DataSet2] Descriptive Statistics Item N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation item7 202 1.00 4.00 3.19 0.80 item8 202 1.00 4.00 3.21 0.80 item9 202 1.00 4.00 3.18 0.80 item10 202 1.00 4.00 3.17 0.79 item11 202 1.00 4.00 3.18 0.80 item12 202 1.00 4.00 3.19 0.80 Valid N (listwise) 202 DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES= item7 item8 item9 item10 item11 item12 /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX. Descriptives [DataSet2] Descriptive Statistics Item N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation item13 202 1.00 4.00 3.15 0.79 item14 202 1.00 4.00 3.14 0.79 item15 202 1.00 4.00 3.11 0.78 item16 202 1.00 4.00 3.16 0.79 item17 202 1.00 4.00 3.11 0.78 item18 202 1.00 4.00 3.15 0.79 Valid N (listwise) 202 DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES= item13 item14 item15 item16 item17 item18 /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX. Descriptives [DataSet2] Descriptive Statistics Item N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation item19 202 1.00 4.00 3.18 0.80 item20 202 1.00 4.00 3.19 0.80 item21 202 1.00 4.00 3.15 0.79 item22 202 1.00 4.00 3.16 0.79 item23 202 1.00 4.00 3.16 0.79 item24 202 1.00 4.00 3.14 0.79 item25 202 1.00 4.00 3.17 0.79 item26 202 1.00 4.00 3.17 0.79 item27 202 1.00 4.00 3.13 0.78 item28 202 1.00 4.00 3.14 0.79 item29 202 1.00 4.00 3.15 0.79 item30 202 1.00 4.00 3.14 0.79 item31 202 1.00 4.00 3.13 0.78 item32 202 1.00 4.00 3.14 0.79 item33 202 1.00 4.00 3.13 0.78 item34 202 1.00 4.00 3.13 0.78 item35 202 1.00 4.00 3.14 0.79 Valid N (listwise) 202 DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES= item19 item20 item21 item22 item23 item24 item25 item26 item27 item28 item29 item30item31 item32 item33 item34 item35 /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX. FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=leadership Styles /BARCHART FREQ /ORDER=ANALYSIS. SAVE OUTFILE='C:\G.OBIZ\user\Documents\ Ofangbonmu,Unity data.sav’/COMPRESSED. Hypothesis 1 Descriptive Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N Autocratic leadership style 3.12 0.78 202 Job productivity 3.15 0.79 202 Correlations Autocratic leadership style Autocratic leadership style Job productivity Pearson Correlation 1 Sig. (2-tailed) N 202 Job productivity Pearson Correlation -0.720** Sig. (2-tailed) 0.001 N 202 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Hypothesis 2 Descriptive Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N Democratic leadership style 3.19 0.80 202 Job productivity 3.15 0.79 202 Correlations Democratic leadership style Democratic leadership style Job productivity Pearson Correlation 1 Sig. (2-tailed) Job productivity N 202 Pearson Correlation 0.730** Sig. (2-tailed) 0.001 N 202 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Hypothesis 3 Descriptive Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N Bureaucratic leadership style 3.14 0.79 202 Job productivity 3.15 0.79 202 Correlations Bureaucratic leadership style Bureaucratic leadership style Job productivity Pearson Correlation 1 Sig. (2-tailed) Job productivity N 202 Pearson Correlation 0.520** Sig. (2-tailed) 0.001 N 202 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Hypothesis 4 Regression Leadership Styles and Job Productivity among Non-Teaching Staff Variables Entered/Removed^a,b Model 1 Variables Entered Variables Removed Autocratic Leadership Style, Democratic Leadership Style, Bureaucratic Leadership Style Method . Enter a. Dependent Variable: Job Productivity b. Models are based only on cases for which leadership styles were considered c. All requested variables entered Model Summary Model 1 R .638 R Square Adjusted R Square .407 .398 Std. Error of the Estimate Change Statistics R Square Change .407 .447 a. Predictors: (Constant), Autocratic Leadership Style, Democratic Leadership Style, Bureaucratic Leadership Style ANOVA^a,b Model 1 Sum of Squares Regression Residual Df- Mean Square 3 198 F Sig. 9.082 .200 45.410 Total 66.936 201 a. Dependent Variable: Job Productivity b. Selecting only cases for which leadership styles were analyzed c. Predictors: (Constant), Autocratic Leadership Style, Democratic Leadership Style, Bureaucratic Leadership Style Coefficients^a,b Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients B 1 (Constant) Autocratic Leadership Style Democratic Leadership Style Bureaucratic Leadership Style t Sig. Std. Error .421 -.329 Beta .427 .105 .215 .304 .283 .110 .195 .312 .109 95.0% Confidence Interval for B a. Dependent Variable: Job Productivity b. Selecting only cases for which leadership styles were analyzed Hypothesis 5 Descriptive Statistics for Gender Distribution DESCRIPTIVES VARIABLES=male female /STATISTICS=MEAN STDDEV MIN MAX /SORT=MEAN (A). N Male Female Total Minimum- Maximum- Mean- Std. Deviation- Correlations (Male & Female) Leadership Style Autocratic Leadership Style Democratic Leadership Style Bureaucratic Leadership Style Sex Male Female Male Female Male Female N- Pearson Correlation (r) -0.345 - Sig. (2-tailed- 1.350 - Fisher’s Z Test for Comparing Correlation Coefficients S/N 1 2 Gender Male Female N 89 113 r-calculated .856 .871 Z-calculated 1.347 Z-table value 1.96