Reparel Technology Review
REPAREL TECHNOLOGY REVIEW
Elemental Lessons from Copper
We’ve all seen those late night informercials and ESPN commercials advertising Copper infused
products. Copper is pseudoscience and has been disproven clinically in multiple situations, including a
double-blind study on their use in bracelets.17 After the initial consumer craze others moved into the
market infused compression garments with Copper. Most notably was Tommie Copper who made broad
claims on the effectivity of their products for pain relief for not only general inflammation, but
Fibromyalgia, Multiple Sclerosis, and Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The FTC does not take such marketing claims lightly and filed a class action law suit for $1.25M in
December of 2015 for the false or unsubstantiated claims that the copper in the apparel relieves pain,
that wearing the garments provides relief from chronic or severe pain and from pain and inflammation
caused by serious diseases, and that the garments provide pain relief comparable to – or even better
than – drugs or surgery.3
Since then, other companies have come on the market with similar appeal but instead leaning on the
market approved benefits of compression (increase circulation/oxygenation to reduce swelling and aid
in recovery) and copper (anti-odor/anti-bacterial). The wide promotion of these products and their
celebrity endorsement has sold millions of sleeves, but still perceived to pseudoscience and endorsed in
the medical community as nothing more than placebo or proprioceptive.
Some patients have experienced positive results. Due to the nature of copper as a conductor, possessing
the ability to retain heat, perceived benefits are likely by maintaining warmth to a joint which in many
cases is beneficial in application.
Reparel Materials
Since day one, Reparel has approached the market cautiously. After compiling our materials and testing
through observation and anecdotal outcomes for both acute and degenerative inflammation, it was
clear that Reparel was eliciting a physiological response in the body that was effective in reducing
common musculoskeletal inflammation, both for post-operative use and conservative treatments.
Reparel’s mission is to validate the use of Reparel in clinical settings and avoid the retail pitfalls of massmarket.
Fundamentally, the material used in Reparel fabric is vastly different than anything else on the market.
We have selected specific materials for the ability to reflect energy. We use a propriety blend of
elemental semi-conductors which are ground to nanoparticles and embedded in the fibers of the
product. The characteristics of semi-conductors are both thermo-conductive and have a high reflectivity.
Meaning when thermal energy is absorbed it will reflect that energy non-thermally on a photonic
wavelength.
To prove the mechanism of action behind the Reparel material we measured the reflectance and
wavelength on the electro-magnetic wave spectrum. Performed at the Colorado School of Minds using a
Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy we were able to identify the output of Reparel fabric (two
specific compositions) when warmed to 37˚C to match the normal radiation of the human body.14
In Figure 1 of the CSOM data we identified that Fabric 1 reflected energy significantly in the Near
Infrared (NIR) range with rising reflectance around 680nm and peaks around 800nm. Fabric 2 did not
reflect in the NIR range when heated to normal temperature but did peak in Mid Infrared range and
beyond. Both materials appear to reflect in the MIR and likely the Far Infrared range. (Figure 1)
Further exploration would include the measurement in the FIR as well as potential variance at high
temperatures to mimic the body heat in situations of acute inflammation when heat is more present.
Anecdotally we have observed that the greater reflectance (Fabric 1) is best suited for inflammatory
conditions that do not have normal markers of acute inflammation (ie. heat), utilized for degenerative
inflammation (ie. tendinopathy and osteoarthritis). We have positioned Fabric 2 with the lower
reflectance for acute inflammation since heat is at a greater intensity the higher reflectance is not
necessary.
Infrared Energy and Photobiomodulation
Infrared Radiation (IR) is electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths between 760nm and 100,000nm.
Increasing evidence suggests that IR can carry out photostimulation or photobiomodulation effects
particularly benefiting neural stimulation and wound healing.1 Original this was characterized as Low
Level Laser Therapy or Cold Laser, but with increasing mechanisms and invention of devices that do not
require a power source, Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy emerged.2
The use of this term is key, as it distinguishes photobiomodulation therapy from the previous use of
light-based devices for simple heating of tissues. A more comprehensive definition would be ‘a form of
light therapy that utilizes non-ionizing forms of light sources on the infrared spectrum. It is a nonthermal
process involving endogenous chromophores eliciting photophysical and photochemical events at
various biologic scales. The process results in beneficial therapeutic outcomes including but not limited
to the alleviation of pain or inflammation, immunomodulation, and promotion of wound healing and
tissue regeneration,’9 (Figure 3)
Photobiomodulation in Clinical Settings
Soon after the discovery of lasers in the 1960s it was realized that laser therapy (now PBMT) had the
potential to improve wound healing and reduce pain, inflammation and swelling. Although Low-Level
Laser Therapy (LLLT) has numerous studies and is used to treat a wide variety of ailment, it remains
controversial due to the lack of understanding on its exact biochemical mechanisms and a large variance
of parameters such as wavelength, fluence, power, and timing of application.6
With over 4000 studies on pub.med.gov, there is now more hard evidence on the basic mechanisms,
pre-clinical applications, and clinical benefits of LLLT / PBMT. Several reviews referenced in this study as
well numerous in vitro cellular studies, animal studies, and human trials.12 Sometimes inconsistent, yet
all are promising and point to several modalities and applications that could greatly impact the medical
community and soon become a new standard of care.
With the advantage of being non-invasive, the applications of PBM are broad, going from pain relief to
promoting the recovery of tendinopathies, nerve injuries, osteoarthritis, and wound healing.
Parameters and Mechanisms of Action of PBM
Low-level light therapy has always utilized wavelengths in the Near Infrared Range as an optical window
has been identified between -nm). Effective tissue penetration is maximized in this range,
specifically wavelengths in the range of 780-950nm that are used to treat deep tissues.6 Wavelengths at
760-820nm have been identified to be the most efficient modulators of mitochondrial function,
stimulating cellular energy metabolism and energy production through photoacceptor molecule
(chromophore) cytochrome c oxidase in the electron chain transport.11 (Figure 4)
Mitochrondia is the powerhouse of the cell as they convert food molecules and oxygen intro energy
(ATP) by oxidative phosphorylation. PBM increases the availability of electrons for the reduction of
molecular oxygen in the center of cytochrome c oxidase, increasing the mitochondrial membrane
potential and the levels of ATP, cAMP, ROS, and Nitric Oxide (NO).10 (Figure 2.) NO is a well-known
potent vasodilator facilitating the relaxation of smooth muscles cells in the lining of blood vessels and
lymphatic vessels.13
Far infrared (FIR) is also absorbed by the human body but likely not through the same mechanisms as
NIR. The principle chromophore at FIR wavelengths is water which could alter several signaling pathways
that could have positive therapeutic effects. The body experiences its energy as a gentle radiant heat
which penetrate up 4 cm beneath this skin without producing detectable skin heating.4 Water light
interactions in the oxygen-independent pathway, lead to photoinduced non-linear oscillations in water
that could provide energy for cellular reactions, including metabolism and signaling.
Although much of the theorized applications and mechanisms appear to be similar to PBMT, there is still
much more data required for scientific certainty.4
Application
There are four clinical targets for PBMT:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The site of injury to promote healing, remodeling and reduce inflammation.
Lymph nodes to reduce edema and inflammation
Nerves to induce analgesia
Trigger points to reduce tenderness and relax contracted muscle fibers.
The overall positive, short term clinical studies in addition to strong laboratory studies should give the
clinical confidence that LLLT may be beneficial for many individuals suffering from musculoskeletal pain,
regardless of the cause.7
Inflammation Protocols
The general practice has been to reduce inflammation but the problem with this approach is that
preventing inflammation may hinder recovery. The focus should be to allow inflammatory processes to
progress naturally rather than inhibit. Therapy should not be to obliterate the inflammatory response,
but instead restore the normal regulation of inflammatory responses. The use of existing therapies,
particularly NSAIDS, to block inflammation appears to have negative effects on regenerative processes.18
Incorrectly regulated, persistent inflammation is a major contributor to the pathogenesis of many
musculoskeletal disease including age-related pathologies such as osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. The
mechanisms are complex but closely associated with mitochondrial dysfunction.8 It is important to
recognize that inflammation is the first stage in the healing process and regulation of this process would
include successful progression to the latter phases, repair/proliferation and remodeling.
With potential adverse effects of various therapies, PBM has well established studies demonstrating the
reduction of edema, and reductions in markers of oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokines with
an almost complete lack of reported adverse effects.5 This especially deserves consideration for not only
joint inflammation, but acute inflammatory symptoms post-operatively. Current protocols of pain relief
like ice and cold therapy could retard proliferation at the early stages of regeneration.16 Whether in
combination or independent of, PBM therapies can ensure proper regulation of the inflammatory
pathways to promote the natural healing process.
Photobiomodulation in Apparel
In recent years nanotechnology development has provided new methods of providing light therapy in a
comfortable and easy form. In general, the mechanism of action of IR radiating materials is to transform
heat energy from the body (convection and conduction) into radiation within the IR wavelength to
induce homeostasis and photobiomodulation. The use of such materials is possibly helpful to enhance
blood circulation and the metabolism of the human body.1
This mode of application could be more flexible method of portable, lifestyle-enhancing applications for
treating a variety of medical applications independent of a power source. Potentially reducing the
reliance of compression garments which appear to function more by preventing distention of veins,
rather than acute swelling. It has even been determined that regardless of pressure applied, the most
important factor in selecting a garment for such purpose is patient compliance.15
Conclusion
The potential applications of technologies such as Reparel in tandem of the emergence of
Photobiomodulation and its acceptance by the medical community create vast opportunities for various
conditions, as well as the disruption of outdated protocols and treatment methods. Furthermore, the
Reparel technology is only in its infancy. New materials can be sourced and include with increased
wearable technologies and the identification of other wearable therapeutics. Iterations of compositions,
materials, and even geometrical shape allow for differentiation of wavelengths and intensities for
specification to various conditions or desired outcomes.
References
1. B., J. P. (2018, May 01). Biological Effect and Medical Applications of Infrared Radiation. Author
Manuscript. PubMed Central.
2. Biophotonics, J. (2016). Photobiomodulation or Low-Level Laser Therapy. Author Manuscript,-. Cooper, L. (2015, Decemeber 18). Exercise & Fitness. Retrieved from Consumer Reports:
https://www.consumerreports.org/exercise-fitness/copper-compression-sleeves-and-painrelief/
4. Fatma Vatansever, M. R. (November 1 2012). Far infrared radiation (FIR): its biological effects
and medical applications. Photonics Lasers Med,-. Hamblin, M. R. (2017). Mechanisms and applications of the anti-inflammatory effects of
photobiomodulation. AIMS Biophys, 4(3):-. Hoon Chung, T. D.-Y. (2012). The Nuts and Bolts Of Low-Level Laser (light) Therapy. Annals of
Biomedical Engineering,-. Howard B Cotler, R. T. (2015). The Use of Low Laser Therapy (LLLT) For Musculoskeletal Pain.
MOJ Orthop Rheumatol, 2(5).
8. Jiri Gallo, M. R. (2017). Inflammation and its resolution and the musculoskeletal system. Journal
of Orthopaedic Translation , 10, 52-67.
9.
Juanita J. Anders, P. R. (2015). Low-Level Light/Laser Therapy Versus Photobiomodulation
Therapy. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, Volume 33, Number 4, 183-184.
10. Lucas Freitas De Freitas, M. R. (2016). Proposed Mechanisms of Photobiomodulation or LowLevel Light Therapy. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 22(3).
11. Margaret T.T. Wong-Riles, H. L. (February 11 2006). Photobiomodulation Directly Benefits
Primary Neurons Functionally Inactivated by Toxins. The Journal Of Biological Chemistry, Vol.
280 pp-. Michael R. Hamblin, P. (August 2010). Introduction to Experimental and Clinical Studies Using
Low-Level Laser (Light) Therapy (LLLT). Lasers Surg Med, 42(6):-. Murad, F. (2011). Discovery of nitric oxide and cyclic GMP in cell signaling and their role in drug
development. International Conference on Molecular Neurodegeneration (pp. 22-24). Shanghai,
China: BioMed Central.
14. PHD, G. L. (2016). Optical Response of Reparel Fabrics, 0.3-2.5um. Golden, Colorado: Colorado
School of Mines.
15. Rhys J. Morris, P. J. (2004). Evidence-Based Compression. Annals of Surgery, Volume 239 (2).
16. Ryo Takagi, N. F. (2011). Influence of icing on muscle regeneration after crush injury to skeletal
muscles in rats. J Appl Physiol, 110:-. Stewart J. Richmond, S. G. (2013). Copper Bracelets and Magnetic Wrist Straps for Rheumatoid
Arthritis - Analgesic and Ainti-Inflammatory Effects: A Randomised Double-Blind Placebo
Controlled Crossover Trial. PLOS ONE, Volume 8 Issue 9.
18. Urso, M. L. (2013). Anti-inflammatory interventions and skeletal muscle injury: benefit or
detriment? J Appl Physiol, 115: 920-928.
FIGURE 3.
The spectrum of electromagnetic radiation and some biological changes it may induce.
Figure 4.
Tissue optical window.